Dissidentpress

April 29, 2008

The longer they stay, the bigger the number the more crimes they commit

img0.gif

 

The longer they stay, the bigger the number, and the more crimes they commit

Danish version

“Every fifth male descendant of immigrants got at least one sentence in 2005. It’s more than twice as many than among Danish people in the same ages…”  
[...]
 
“22 p.c. – more than every fifth – of male descendants of ages 20-29 years old was convicted for one or more crimes in 2005. The corresponding number for etnic Danes in the same ages was less than the half, 9.8, while 12.5 p.c. of the young immigrants were convicted…”
Today reality is precisely as we have described it to become twenty years ago, and latest a few years ago: The longer they stay here, the worse they become, the average number of births a women rises, they speak our language even more imperfect, and they are more unemployed and more active concerning crimes in second and third generation compared with their parents. We have at least six good reason for counting the immigrants correctly and place the responsibility right: 

Six good reasons: http://www.lilliput-information.com/six.html

If it continues apparently without any sense of reality and rational reasoning for more than 1-2 years more, and it is not then turned upside down to repatriation Europe’s way into Dark Ages has definitively been chosen by roadmap-marionets who in reality rule this country and Europe.       
 

Complement: The Problem with Islam in Europe: 


 

 Danish women should especially think carefully

Danske kvinder skal tænke sig allermest om:


muslimrape.gif

 
 

 

 Sonia

February 26, 2008

Hamas Children’s Program Call On Assassination Of Danish Cartoonist

http://www.dr.dk/NETTV/Update/2008/02/26/145709.htm?wbc_purpose=upda (after a short Danish introduction you get the Hamas program)

European Union (EU) gives money to Hamas!

Jens

February 8, 2008

American piece of information from early 2005

AN AMERICAN CONCERN

Fox News and CNN’s Lou Dobbs worry about terrorists stealing across the United States’ border with Mexico concealed among illegal immigrants. The Pentagon wages war in the Middle East to stop terrorist attacks on the United States. But the growing nightmare of officials at the Department of Homeland Security is passport-carrying, visa-exempt mujahideen coming from the United States’ western European allies.

Jihadist networks span Europe from Poland to Portugal, thanks to the spread of radical Islam among the descendants of guest workers once recruited to shore up Europe’s postwar economic miracle. In smoky coffeehouses in Rotterdam and Copenhagen, makeshift prayer halls in Hamburg and Brussels, Islamic bookstalls in Birmingham and “Londonistan,” and the prisons of Madrid, Milan, and Marseilles, immigrants or their descendants are volunteering for jihad against the West. It was a Dutch Muslim of Moroccan descent, born and socialized in Europe, who murdered the filmmaker Theo van Gogh in Amsterdam last November (2004). A Nixon Center study of 373 mujahideen in Western Europe and North America between 1993 and 2004 found more than twice as many Frenchmen as Saudis and more Britons than Sudanese, Yemenites, Emiratis, Lebanese, or Libyans. Fully a quarter of the jihadists it listed were western European nationals — eligible to travel visa-free to the United States.

The emergence of homegrown mujahideen in Europe threatens the United States as well as Europe. Yet it was the dog that never barked at last winter’s Euro-American rapprochement meeting.
Neither President George W. Bush nor Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice drew attention to this mutual peril, even though it should focus minds and could buttress solidarity in the West.

YOUR LAND IS MY LAND

The mass immigration of Muslims to Europe was an unintended consequence of post-World War II guest-worker programs. Backed by friendly politicians and sympathetic judges, foreign workers, who were supposed to stay temporarily, benefited from family reunification programs and became permanent. Successive waves of immigrants formed a sea of descendants. Today, Muslims constitute the majority of immigrants in most western European countries, including Belgium, France, Germany, and the Netherlands, and the largest single component of the immigrant population in the United Kingdom. Exact numbers are hard to come by because Western censuses rarely ask respondents about their faith. But it is estimated that between 15 and 20 million Muslims now call Europe home and make up four to five percent of its total population. (Muslims in the United States probably do not exceed 3 million, accounting for less than two percent of the total population.) France has the largest proportion of Muslims (seven to ten percent of its total population), followed by the Netherlands, Germany, Denmark, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and Italy. Given continued immigration and high Muslim fertility rates, the National Intelligence Council projects that Europe’s Muslim population will double by 2025.

Unlike their U.S. counterparts, who entered a gigantic country built on immigration, most Muslim newcomers to western Europe started arriving only after World War II, crowding into small, culturally homogenous nations. Their influx was a new phenomenon for many host states and often unwelcome. Meanwhile, North African immigrants retained powerful attachments to their native cultures. So unlike American Muslims, who are geographically diffuse, ethnically fragmented, and generally well off, Europe’s Muslims gather in bleak enclaves with their compatriots: Algerians in France, Moroccans in Spain, Turks in Germany, and Pakistanis in the United Kingdom.

The footprint of Muslim immigrants in Europe is already more visible than that of the Hispanic population in the United States. Unlike the jumble of nationalities that make up the American Latino community, the Muslims of Western Europe are likely to be distinct, cohesive, and bitter. In Europe, host countries that never learned to integrate newcomers collide with immigrants exceptionally retentive of their ways, producing a variant of what the French scholar Olivier Roy calls “globalized Islam”: militant Islamic resentment at Western dominance, anti-imperialism exalted by revivalism.

As the French academic Gilles Kepel acknowledges, “neither the blood spilled by Muslims from North Africa fighting in French uniforms during both world wars nor the sweat of migrant laborers, living under deplorable living conditions, who rebuilt France (and Europe) for a pittance after 1945, has made their children … full fellow citizens.” Small wonder, then, that a radical leader of the Union of Islamic Organizations of France, a group associated with the Muslim Brotherhood, curses his new homeland: “Oh sweet France! Are you astonished that so many of your children commune in a stinging naal bou la France [fuck France], and damn your Fathers?”

————————————

The Standard-Correction:

Number of foreigners or of Muslims mentioned above have to be multiplied by (from 1,75 to 2 ,00) as the naturalized for almost two generations and their children have to be included.

Complement:

The 9/11 Al-Qaeda plotters that apart from the Saudi “muscle” all “became born-again Muslims in Europe after living “normal” lives in their countries of origin. The mosques of Hamburg (Al Qods), London (Finsbury Park), Marseilles and even Montreal played a far bigger role than any Saudi madrassa in the process of their Islamic radicalization.”

January 12, 2008

The beginning of the homocide in Dafur

Filed under: Dafur, History, Islam, Jihad, Justice, Terror, War, crimes, hate-crimes, migration, perspectives — jensn @ 7:33 pm

Source: http://www.lnsart.com/Sudan%20Slave%20Story.htm

“…The war between the Islamic north and Christian south Sudan has old roots, stemming back to the 1950s when the country, separated at the time was made one by the western world after World War II. Shortly the country of Sudan was emancipated from England. A war between the two religious factions broke out in 1983, with the Islamic north invading the southern Christians. This is considered the time by which the current struggle is measured. From 1983, it is estimated that at least two million people have been killed in this genocide, mostly Christians, for sure civilians. Early on in this conflict, two professors at the University of Khartoum; Ushari Ahmad Mahmud and Suleyman Ali Baldo learned about the genocide and enslavement being practiced on the Dinka people and had investigated it. What they found was that raiders from the north were killing the men and had taken women and children and into slavery for over two years. They wrote their report in 1987. It was widely circulated and was denied by the Sudanese government. The UN assimilated the report and then discounted it as hearsay. These two humane professors were incarcerated by their government and then were discredited throughout the world. The civilized world would not and could not hear…”

Now you read almost everywhere that the conflicht started in 2003.

First-hand-source

As a minor but hopefully enlightening parallel to this: “There was no confirmed homocide on Armenians 1915-1918″

Jens

November 21, 2007

Its a MUST: Islam: What The West Needs To Know

http://thepiratebay.org/tor/3686164/Islam_-_What_the_West_Needs_to_Know_(Examination_of_Islam)(2006)

From the abstract:
“…The most important characteristic of Islam not understood by the West is that it is more a system of government than a personal religion. Throughout its history, Islam has never recognized a distinction between the religious and the secular/political. Islamic law governs every aspect of religious, political, and personal action, which amounts to a form of totalitarianism that is divinely enjoined to dominate the world, analogous in many ways to Communism…”

You simply have to download this film. Do it today or it could be too late.

Jensn

November 19, 2007

Strategic Patterns - Sources of Threats, Future, Adjustment, Impacts

The European Elite has aimed for a systematic strategy to get the national states dismantled and replaced by an ideological project. The ethnic Europeans are becoming more and more sceptical, but that definitely does not prevent the train in moving on towards Neurope, and Eurabia as long as the oiltrade secures the Euro-consuming European Elite.The ethnic Europeans are simply ignored in all matters concerning them most dearly a lot of investigations show. I addition what concerns the semi-secret alliance-efforts towards the Arabic world the strategic components seen from here are the mentions ones in the links below.

To draw an almost realistic picture of the future in Denmark and in Europe, you have to make some assumptions concerning among other things characterizing patterns that remain unchanged or that are expected to develop along some fairly known directions according to experience. And the expected reactions to this development must also be included if possible.

You may choose between lots of relations that are the building bricks in this model of patterns. Of course this reading is just a sketch, but on the other hand I have chosen building bricks that have been pretty good described until now. If other patterns would be more valid, or easier to forecast or predict something on I will let the reader judges and eventually contibute to:

[You can choose as you like between the strategic patterns/issues that you want to know more about. You open a new window with the contents of each link. When you have finished a link you just close the window again and perhaps you open another via another the link and read what you need to know]

The Mass-immigration-project of ideology fueled from chiefly Muslim dominated areas or Free Muslims Immigration To Europe or The number of muslims or perhaps The distance between official and the real number in Denmark or

Welfare will collapse

The building of the state of Europe with constitution,

Commpulsory currency of unit, and an army as a substitute for those of the nations’

The attack on the economic and financial sovereignity via borrowing according to deliberately misunderstood Keynes-surplus-supply-politics or

Adjustment to the intergration of power including the attack on the menthal condition of individuals amongs strong, active Peoples

The patterns, perhaps these instead, If we will know the dimension of the problem

the threats,

the future,

a supplement or

future in pictures

The final important strategic field that is distintly dominating the development and that the originators/the decisionmakers try to effect where they wisely should adapt instead (as they can do nothing) is a strongly increasing international competition that has been made possible thanks to the technogical developments that I hope everybody should be allowed to enjoy, if they want to. This development might remove the foundation as we have known it for about the last hundred years. But never mind, that has happened lots of times earlier.

My single and only claim: Without Ideology!

J. E. Vig, Danmark, 18 November 2007

Complement: http://danmark.wordpress.com/2007/06/28/eus-southern-drive-is-the-impossible-alternative-ideology/

Take Reality Serious - video

Take Reality Serious
A blog for those who take Reality serious

While Sweden Slept

For the last 2-3 days we had the posibility to make the video: While Denmark Slept. I am sure we will get another chance one of those days.

Sonia

November 17, 2007

New Book by a Macedonian: The Coming Balkan Caliphate

kalifatet.jpgOn Tochi Percan blog we find: http://balkanpress.blogspot.com/2007/11/en-ny-bok-coming-balkan-caliphate.html

An excerpt:

Christopher Deliso has written a book with the title The Coming Balkan Caliphate: The Great Radical Islam to Europe and the West. The writer has lived in Macedonia and have investigated the Radical Islamism on Balkan: Bosnia and Kosovo.

Om Bosnien skriver han så här:

It would not be until the watershed events of September 11, 2001, that the role of Bosnia as an incubator and catalyst for international terrorism would become impossible to ignore. This embarrassing truth had long been suppressed by the many Western diplomats, journalists, and public relations hacks who had built large fortunes and careers on protecting this myth of their own making…Preliminary to any historical debate, therefore it must be acknowledged that high-powered Washington lobbyists and much of the Western media purposefully distorted, omitted, and concealed key facts on the ground.

An on Kosovo:

Albanians, whether from Albania, Kosovo, or Macedonia, have scoffed at the idea of a major religious fundamentalist incursion in their midst. So have their Western yes-men. The West heavily backed the Kosovo Liberation Army during the NATO bombing, despite the presence of mujahedin in its ranks, and for Western publics to suspect that this cause has been muddled up with an Islamist one would amount to a public relations disaster for both Clinton-era political veterans and for the Albanians themselves. Indeed, it would call into question the entire rationale for Western intervention in Kosovo…”

[...]

Excerpt from: http://www.exilestreet.com/Columns/Gorin/20071030GorinCaliphate.html

The Islamist cause that Deliso refers to is the prevalence of Saudi Arabia, UAE and others who have been active in the Balkans since even before Western interventions there but for whom the interventions were a major boon — and downright coup. Wahhabi groups and “charities” entice Albanians in Kosovo and Macedonia with hundreds of dollars per month for every family member who adopts the strictest form of fundamentalist Islam. To that end, the Balkan landscape has been changing, not only with the new, Saudi-style mosques now dotting the formerly Christian lands, always taller than the nearest (and usually vandalized) church, but also with the increasing prevalence of Wahhabi dress and worship.

No apologist for the Serbs, Deliso engages in the standard scolding of the Serbian lobby for its alleged exaggeration of Albanian-connected terror, though he doesn’t go on to debunk any specific exaggeration. Rather, his book demonstrates a terror-laden Balkan reality beyond what even the wildest exaggeration could conceive. Among the revelations in the book is that terror-connected, Saudi-based charities were pulling at least some of the strings behind the big Kosovo pogrom of March 2004, in which 35 churches were dynamited, hundreds of Serbian homes burned, 1,000 people injured and 19 killed. Insider revelations about this episode, however, include that “19″ was just the “agreed” number, with the actual death toll at more than 30 (indeed, initial, pre-damage-control reports had the number at 31). Two other unreported facts are that the rioters killed six NATO peacekeepers and slashed the throats of Serbian farmers’ pigs. Most embarrassing for UNMIK (UN Mission in Kosovo) authorities, reports Deliso, is that the U.S.— and UN-supported Kosovo Prime Minister Agim Ceku’s officers “actively aided the mobs.”

Sonia

November 16, 2007

What we stand for may differ considerably from the mainstream delivery of so-called information


A few have asked what we stand for

As anti-puppets or perhaps dissidents in a most threatened Europe, here it is:

My aim is to inform facts. I don’t deliver anything I believe in or that I just think of as interesting. Hope you notice my documentation and my objective argumentation. As I see it the immigration-project concerning the establishment of a New Mercantile European state based on oil-trade and immigration to Europe to replace the nations is the most servere problem to warn of. My nation Denmark is about 1000 years old, and I don’t accept that one or two generations shall succed with dissolving it for their own private purpose or any ideological brain-spin .

Those were the words you could have found it by looking a bit for it.

I will add: arrogant ignorance we cannot bear

Jihad has begun in Amsterdam, The Economist wrote three years ago

“Islamic terrorism in Europe

Islamic terrorism in Europe

Nov 11th 2004
From The Economist print edition

“THE jihad has come to the Netherlands.” That was the verdict of Jozias van Aartsen, parliamentary leader of the power-sharing Liberals (VVD), after the violence following last week’s murder in Amsterdam of Theo van Gogh, a film-maker, by a Muslim radical. Attacks on mosques and Muslim schools were met by retaliatory attacks on churches. A raid on a terrorist cell in The Hague turned into a street battle featuring hand grenades and wounded policemen, before two suspects were arrested.

This sorry tale raises a big issue not just in the Netherlands, but across Europe: how far should liberal societies tolerate the intolerant? For 20 years the instinct of many has been to defend the rights and cultures of growing numbers of Muslim immigrants, even radicals. Any other approach, it was feared, would pander to racists. But both multiculturalism and tolerance are now under broad attack. …”

Sonia

PS:

Burning cars all over Amsterdam for at least 6 days, we wrote 22 October this year
Amsterdam er overtaget skrev vi den 22. oktober (in Danish)
We did not write much more than we translated here.

Did you follow the TV-reports on the Amsterdam fires. In Europe there were none.

November 9, 2007

So-called genocide in Kosovo a wild exaggeration

Dead in Kosovo Exaggerated

Despite Administration claims last spring, the number of ethnic Albanians killed by Serbs in Kosovo never approached “genocide.” Implications that 100,000+ civilians were murdered are groundless, investigators now say. According to Spanish pathologist Emilio Perez Pujol, head of a team of investigators, “I calculate that the final figure of dead in Kosovo will be 2,500 at the most.” Critics say the inflated numbers were used to justify U.S. Military intervention.” (The VFW Magazine, Page 8, January 2000). This war was created in order to further enhance the impression upon the American people that we must become the world’s policemen, and guess what, under the umbrella of UN.

Sonia

Complements:
Preparation of Terror in Balkan: http://dissidentpress.wordpress.com/2007/02/08/preparation-of-terror-in-balkan/
http://dissidentpress.wordpress.com/2007/02/08/warnings-of-the-development/
http://dissidentpress.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/latest-from-kosovo/

Lie upon lie in Europe: http://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/06/28/loegn-over-loegn-i-europa-gang-pa-gang/ (in Danish)

November 7, 2007

In the Middle of the Middle East this Autumn or this Fall

Filed under: Islam, Terror, Terrorism, War, hate-crimes — jensn @ 9:20 am

A tiny bit of latest from www.debka.com

23 October

Bush and Putin Rough out Breakthrough Strategic Deal for Dumping Iran

An extraction of:http://www.debka.com/article.php?aid=1309

“…The first hint that a strategic deal was brewing was dropped by Russian President Vladimir Putin. At a news conference in Tehran last week, he alluded to a shift in the controversy with Washington which might settle his dispute with President George W. Bush on the US missile shield in East Europe. His comment went largely unnoticed - except by officials in Tehran, who noted his reference to a possible understanding with the Americans – though not with Iran. Then, on Monday, Oct. 22, Bush and Putin talked at length on the phone and made further progress towards an understanding. The outline of the American role in the deal surfaced in Prague Tuesday, Oct. 23, when US secretary of defense Robert Gates suggested a possible delay in activating the proposed US missile interceptor project in Poland and radar station in the Czech Republic - until an Iranian threat was “definitely proved.”…”

7 November

DEBKAfile Exclusive: Israel’s inner cabinet in urgent session today to discuss advanced Iranian nuclear bomb timeline to 2009

5. November

DEBKAfile: Large-scale US Persian Gulf exercise in progress tests preventive tactics against possible Iranian blockade of key Hormuz Straits

US Gulf Forces Drill Tactics to Avert Hormuz Closure

Tehran stops fighting an Interpol vote to list 5 Iranians and a Hizballah man as wanted for 1994 bombing of Argentine Jewish center and 85 deaths

First joint British-Israel air force exercise due with arrival of British AWACS plane

Sonia

November 5, 2007

The Boom Of Crimes Is Still Not Norwegian

Again, My God, from: http://www.aftenposten.no/english/local/article1661877.ece

The Norwegians were called Woodenheads by DONSURBER on: http://blogs.dailymail.com/donsurber/2007/08/19/norwegian-woodenheads/

“…News analysis

Police struggling as Oslo’s crime rate jumps

Oslo’s police department is having a hard time coping with a rising crime rate. Only one in five reported cases is currently being resolved, police seem as frustrated as crime victims, and commentators worry that citizens are having to rely on private security firms to ensure their safety.

The numbers, reported in newspaper Aftenposten, speak for themselves: No country has fewer police per capita than Norway, as many as 70 percent of so-called petty crimes are never followed up, and while the police force has increased 150 percent since 1960, the crime rate has increased 700 percent…”

——-

The Norwegians were called Woodenheads by DONSURBER on: http://blogs.dailymail.com/donsurber/2007/08/19/norwegian-woodenheads/

And an English-written Danish blog http://Dissidentpress.WordPress.com run by Jens Nielsen was almost block by the nonsence from Aftenposten and our unsuspecting friend on the Western side of the Atlantic. This blog got 6,903 on 22 or 23 August 2007, because we long ago had tried qualified with Interpol as literaly the last source to unravel the miss the statistics concerning comparing by nationality had ended up in on: http://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/07/01/last-comparison-of-crime-rates-between-nations-ever/

Comparisons comes to an end we wrote in August 2005: http://www.lilliput-information.com/engsamm.html or http://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/05/21/comparative-analyses-doomed/

And that is the real reason why they write as they like now when all the actually documentation from statistics has been deliberately destoyed.

But now this so-called News-analysis has made enough mistakes and troubles for more than two months

Aftenposten reported in extract from the first link on this entry:

“The dilemma facing the prison authorities is that failure to show up at prison is not yet illegal. Although Parliament has passed new legislation making it a criminal offence to skip prison, the law has not yet been implemented and until it is, prison authorities can do nothing but hope that the criminals will eventually show up at the prison gates.”

——–

I am sure that 99.9 p.c. of the Norwegians agree that the culture and general ethical or moral behavior of Norwegians does not differ very much from that of the Danes or of the Swedes.

Denmark:

The number of notified violations of the criminal law has more than doubled from 1960 to 1990 (200 p.c. increase), and in the period 1980-1990 they increased by 35 p.c. to 550,000 notified violations in average a year.

Earlier about 30 p.c. of such violations were solved, in 1991 about one of five (20%) ended with a solution. I remember when the number decreased to less than 50% in Denmark, and I am 57 years old. In Berlin 44% of such violations were solved in 1996.

In 1960 the Police and Prosecution in Denmark had 7,375 employees, in 1991 the number was 14,500, including 10,200 policemen.

The last year in Denmark:

Source is DR-TTV nr. 122, 15 Mai 2007: The number violations in the first three months of 2007 was 104,604 an increase of 10,000. The violence increased from 3,716 occurences to 4,600, an increase of 23.8 p.c. The total number of violation of the criminal law increased from 95,944 to 104,604 from 1 quarter 2006 to 1 quarter 2007 an increase of 9 p.c. Forced entries to houses and flats increased from 7,400 to 9,500 in 1 quarter compare with 1 quarter 2006, an increase of 28.4 p.c. Violence increased generally from 3,716 to 4,600, 23.8 p.c. Sex crimes, totally : increased from 557 til 647, 16,2 p.c.We naturally know that criminal violence against public authorities weigh heavier in the public pan, but the figures speak themselves. (a tiny bit more than 23.8 p. c. increase)

http://danmark.wordpress.com/2007/06/14/kriminaliteten-er-voldsomt-stigende-ikke-mindst-voldskriminaliteten/ (more details in Danish)

It has nothing to do with a former criminal law in Norwegen about petty crimes.

It has nothing to do with Norwegians. Their number is still decreasing as planned, and they behave, just like the Danes and the Swedes. They are civilized.

Did you know that more than 82 p. c. criminal acts in Copenhagen committed by youngster18 years old or less concerns second and third generation of immigrants?

http://www.lilliput-information.com/domv.html (try this in Danish)

Sonia

You Must Choose Between A Caliphate Or More Tightened Western Rule

A Choise between a Caliphate and a more tightened Western Rule

“Or just about the Iraque-War on the scene or what is the same on the European TV-stations?”

What concerns Arabic means and Europe, Bat Ye’or writes in Eurabia, and the Euro-Arabic Axis: “The Arabic countries contributed with big sums to universities, centres of Islamic studies, international communication agencies private, government organizations to win the opinion of the world”. Just a fragment of this in Danish and a little in English on: http://www.lilliput-information.com/mani.html.

From Jerusalem Post - en boganmeldelse af Bat Ye’ors Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis : “How is it that ten percent of France is Muslim, 15% of Denmark is Muslim and close to half of the births in the next generation will be Muslim? Imperious mosques and lawless Muslim neighborhoods dot the landscape of major European cities. And Spain willingly and meekly chose to acknowledge its Islamic past, and that pro-Arab opinion is rampant and anti-Israeli sentiment vitriolic.”

Euro floats in Arabic oil, while the countries of which the Euro has been made to rise have moved close to zero growth with an enormous unemployment since the currency was introduced. EU possibly contributes to terror too: Euro light floats in oil , http://www.lilliput-information.com/ncen.html og http://www.lilliput-information.com/euara.html (read also below).

Islam on its way

These past 60 odd years the West has been on the defensive trying (ineffectually) to keep Islam at bay and Islam has been on the offensive their declared aim being to convert by armed force the infidels except the Jews whose eradication from this planet has been (with Europe’s quiet acquiescence) pronounced, save young Jewish maidens destined to be parceled out to the harems of the faithful. It was in 1915 that the Caliphate (aka the Ottoman Empire) decided to exterminate her Christian-Armenian subjects (1.6 million by conservative estimate) and incidentally, showed their Germans allies the proper way to conduct genocide; and on Sept 9th, 1922 in the port of Smyrna they butchered Armenians, Greeks and Jews, sparing neither age or sex, to the tune of 100,000 (?).

It was shortly afterwards that Turkey, now a secular republic expelled all the Greeks from Anatolia where they had been living since the days of the Greek city-states.War does indeed make strange bedfellows. The Caliphate’s allies, Germany, Austro-Hungary & Bulgaria, Christian nations all, made no attempt whatsoever to help their co-religionists. In 1915, Germany had several division stationed in Mesopotamia who could easily have stopped that slaughter, but the only nation to protest that holocaust was the United States but as she was, military speaking a nullity, the protest was simply ignored.

As an aside, when the Turks had finished butchering the Armenians and were about to start on the Jews, the Germans stopped them. Go figure.But Islam as a whole went on the offensive in 1947 when Britain (then still Great) abandoned her imperial responsibilities when she allowed India to slide into anarchy, 700,000(?) of her subjects brutally murdered and tens of millions driven from their homes in a state of beggary, a calamity for which Mahatma (”give us chaos”) Gandhi that apostle of non-violence, must share the moral responsibility together with Lord Louis Mountbatten of Britain & Mohammed Ali Jinnah of the Muslim League and, incidentally, helping to usher in the first of the religious wars that are even now raging all over this planet and which finally came to these shore on Feb. 26th, 1993. In all these religious wars, with the exception of Northern Ireland, Islam has been the aggressor.One item amongst dozens should suffice. In the 1960s Islam exploded in both Indonesia as well as Malaysia in righteous wrath against the Zionist-Imperial Infidel, but as there were no Jews and very few Westerners to kill, the Chinese had to play the role of the victims and butchered they were in the tens of thousands, and now that the U.S. once again has moved against Jihadistan, the Chinese may very well be called upon to act again as victims.

In the Western world new mosques are going up every day; everywhere where Islam rules, the synagogues, some dating back to Babylonian times have already been shut down and such churches that are still open are on sufferance.

Equally, wherever Islam has seized power all the Jews have been expelled from territories where they have been living since Babylonian, in some cases Assyrian times, and such Westerners that are still there are either diplomats, journalists or Western renegades selling their expertise to Islam.

In the West, every major and many a minor university has at least one chair devoted to Islamic studies every one of which are staffed by Islamic scholars. How many Islamic universities have departments of Western studies? And how many (if any) of them are staffed with Western scholars?

On September 11th, 2001, when New York & Washington were successfully attacked, (Islam 19, Infidels 3,000), the Arab Street went delirious with joy and not just in the Middle East but also in all Islamic enclaves in Europe. And how did the West respond? The opinion- & decision-makers fell all over themselves in their haste to explain Islam to the infidels, to the point that His Holiness, the Pope, the President of the United States and the Prime Minister of Britain went to the Mosques, and assured us and more important, themselves, that this is not a religious war. Unfortunately, the other side insists that this is a religious war and that they mean to win it.

Islam tried three times, Poitiers, 732, Vienna 1588 & 1683, to conquer Western Europe by force of arms and each time they were turned back—just. But now, there is no need for Islam to march for the third time on Vienna, nor burst once more across the Pyrenees for the enemy (is there a more appropriate term?) is already within the gates. Europe is and continues to be inundated by a tidal wave of asylum-demanders & illegal immigrants none of whom bother even for an instant to hide their venomous hatred of the West and all it stands for; and the governments of Europe are paralyzed by political-correctness, inertia or sheer moral cowardice to stop that invasion.

In France, a junior minister admitted, that the government was afraid that their local Muslim population might have gone on a jihad should France have decided to join the United States in going to war with Iraq or any other Muslim nation. For the time being, the French government tries to deflect the jihadists by throwing them their Jewish citizens as a sop, but it is only a matter of time before the holy warriors get tired of torching synagogues and kosher shops and turn their attention to churches (as happened once already in England) and wine & pork shops. (Anybody noticed how ‘quiet’ the Arab Street has become since Jonathan put on his hobnailed boots and kicked butt?)

In Holland Islam has achieved that critical mass of 10% - (IoD: at least 10% multiplied with 1.5-2.0 in Denmark) and a 10% minority full of passionate intensity & burning with fervor to spread the word can always achieve mastery over the apathetic 90% who have lost faith in their institutions and traditions; aided and abetted by Islam’s useful idiots, the European intelligentsia (God, what a hateful Russian word) who in their relentless culture war against the West are doing invaluable service to ensure Islam’s victory by making the West lose trust in their institutions, denigrating her accomplishments and making them ashamed of their past. (Treason of the intellectuals?)

In Britain, what the Spanish, French & Germans tried to do and failed; Islam succeeded and did so without firing a shot. There are now places in Britain where the Queen’s writ no longer runs but Sharia rules. This loss of sovereignty was amply demonstrated in 1988 when the ruling Ayatollah of Iran issued a death sentence against one Salmon Rushdie the author of the Satanic Verses. The Muslims of Britain made it quite clear that the pronouncement of an Iranian cleric took precedence over the laws of Britain (which goes some length to explain why Britain had to drop the ‘Great’ from its title). By the way, I understand that there is a bitter joke making its round in Britain that Europe will soon be renamed Eurabia.

And how has Europe responded to these and other threats? The European Parliament has recently passed legislation that will make a letter like this a criminal offence both to the writer as well as to the recipient should the latter fail to alert the authorities. In Germany, the dominant power of the European Union, this is known as Anmeldepflicht.

Postscripts

What would have happened had Islam won the battle of Poitiers (and it was a dammed close thing)? Let Edward Gibbons (1737-1794 author of The Decline & Fall of the Roman Empire tell it in his own inimitable way:

A victorious line of march had been prolonged above a thousand miles from the rock of Gibraltar to the banks of the Loire; the repetition of an equal space would have carried the Saracens to the confines of Poland and the Highlands of Scotland: the Rhine is not more impassable than the Nile or Euphrates, and the Arabian fleet might have sailed without a naval combat into the mouth of the Thames. Perhaps the interpretation of the Koran would now be taught in the schools of Oxford, and her pulpits might demonstrate to a circumcised people the sanctity and truth of the revelation of Mahomet.

Although Islam was stopped cold at Poitiers and Vienna, she conquered and held in subjugation for several hundred years present day: Albania / Bosnia-Herzegovina / Bulgaria / Crete / Cyprus / Greece / Hungary / Montenegro / Portugal/ Romania / Serbia / Spain / and that’s just in Europe.

Although Islam promises every hour on the hour to slaughter Jews wherever they can be found, the principal victims of their righteous rage to date have been: Christians (2 millions minimum) / Buddhists / Hindus (700,000?) / Sikhs / Muslim (Shiites vs. Sunnis) Jainists / Parsis / Pagans / Animists / etc. etc. etc. with Jews at the end of the line. Islam does not discriminate; it is an equal opportunity killer.

It is a perfect indicator of the time we live in that the leaders of the West: political, scholastic, ecclesiastic, and above all, the pontificators of the Fourth Estate simply cannot bring themselves to face, let alone to state the obvious fact that the West is immeasurably superior to Islam. Harmony in music / perspective in painting / painless surgery / the eradication of many diseases that had plagued mankind throughout the ages / the abolishment of slavery / the harnessing of electricity, of steam and oil / the principles of flight, including into outer space / of photography / household plumbing (let us pay homage to the lowly Western plumber for it was he, not the medical profession, who banished cholera, dysentery & typhoid) / telephone, television & the computer/ the list goes on and on. Further, the universal languages of the arts & sciences are: English, French, Italian & German all Western tongues. The proof of the pudding is in the eating. Islamic students go to Western universities in their tens of thousands, very few Westerners attend Islamic universities save for religious studies.

E. David Litvak

EU millions: Was aid handed to terror gangs?
The European Union [ EU ] is a representation of the efforts of Comrade Bill Clinton, continued by Pres G. Bush, in a program called “The Free Trade Area of the Americas” or “FTAA” for short. Opposition by some of the South American countries has caused the current administration to shorten it down to “The Central America Free Trade Agreement” or “CAFTA” for short until they can club the recalcitrant SA countries into submission. The current disastrous NAFTA would be replaced by the FTAA.The person who is the prime negotiator is a fellow named Robert B. Zoellick, currently on the Federal Payroll of the Executive Branch, in the titled position of “US Trade Representative”, a Cabinet Ranked job. He is a long time member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Since the FTAA/CAFTA is being patterned after the EU, you may wish to subscribe to several organizations in England and other countries who are trying to save the Sovereign Nation Of England, and their own, from becoming another slave state of the EU and its soviet styled government. France and Germany have teamed up with Belgium to become the total dictator of Europe. The organizations that are fighting to keep England a sovereign nation are listed at the end of this document. For God and Country, FSI, DEO VINDICE, Chet. IT BEGAN with a suspicion in the mind of two MEPs, Ilka Schröder and François Zimeray, that European Union funding for the Palestinian Authority was being diverted into the pockets of terrorists. By the time the EU working group had finished its investigation, it had uncovered evidence to show that Yasser Arafat, the Palestinian president, had personally signed cheques to people linked with terrorist activity. This week, fresh allegations have surfaced that money intended for use by the Palestinian Authority for legitimate purposes has been siphoned off by corrupt officials, ostensibly to pay the wages of 7,000 non-existent staff. But rather than prosecutions and the recovery of misappropriated funds, the investigation has concluded with a whimper, petering out in two conflicting reports and an inconclusive debate.What it is has provided, however, is a salutary lesson in the Labyrinthine workings of the EU and the possibility that future donations may be Subject to rather more scrutiny than that which applied to the $246 million (£134 million) handed over without question to the Palestinian Authority.Ms Schröder and Mr Zimeray’s determination uncovered a murky world where money from the EU’s constituent states was channelled into the pockets of dubious figures in the Palestinian Authority, and from there into the pockets of Palestinian terrorist groups. They were unlikely champions of such a cause: Mr Zimeray was a French socialist MEP; Ms Schröder, a German Green MEP and later an associated member of the Group of the European United Left/Nordic Green Left. What they shared was a frustration with what they regarded as the EU’s implicit support for the Palestinian Authority, regardless of whether it was right for wrong.Ms Schröder was in no doubt about what had happened to the money. In an open letter, she wrote: “It is a well known fact that the EU-funding for the Palestinian Authority was channelled to a black budget. It is also well known that the Palestinian Authority has financed a murderous anti-Semitic terrorist war against Israel. Israel provided the European Commission with proof of this use of EU-funding in May 2002. Since then, the commission denies having any knowledge of this specific use of the money and the Conference of Presidents successfully stalled an inquiry committee on this issue.” But from the start, it was an uphill battle. Chris Patten, the EU foreign affairs commissioner, was against any investigation, arguing it amounted to ignoring Palestinian suffering. Ms Schroeder could not stomach that argument: she accused Mr Patten of “winking approval of terrorist attacks funded by the EU”.Mr Zimeray and Ms Schröder pressed ahead and, after four months, had the 157 signatures they needed for a vote on the matter. Mr Patten’s attempts to persuade Euro MPs to drop the matter were rejected, and the parliament set up a working group to look into the claims. Already, officials in Brussels were admitting they could not account for every penny spent by the Palestinian Authority. When Mr Patten protested that there was no need for further investigation because the International Monetary Fund supervised the EU’s funding arrangements, Thomas Dawson, the director of the IMF’s external relations department, made it clear it could not monitor or control every item in the budget. Even Salam Fayyad, the Palestinian finance minister, admitted the system was open to corruption. Meanwhile, the working group ploughed on with its investigations, uncovering plenty of evidence to suggest money had ended up in the wrong pockets. The evidence suggested that money paid to the Palestinian Authority may have found its way to the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, a group responsible for hundreds of attacks on Israeli targets. There was even evidence to show Mr Arafat had signed payment orders for thousands of pounds for people directly involved in terrorist activity. But when it came to their conclusions, they were divided on how much credence to give to the evidence they had uncovered, with seven members believing it was not of sufficient quality to stand up in court and six prepared to accept it. Ms Schröder was unimpressed with their efforts: “The working group was established in order to downplay the importance of the issue,” she wrote in a letter to the group.Charles Tannock, the Tory foreign affairs spokesman in the European Parliament and one of the authors of the minority group’s report, called it a whitewash. He said the majority report had chosen to ignore signed payment orders by Mr Arafat to the tune of $39,000 (£22,000) “to people linked to terrorist activities or their families” on the basis that they amounted to circumstantial evidence only and did not prove that payments had been made. “I am very suspicious about giving money in cash to a theatre of war where corruption is endemic,” he said. Mr Tannock said that he believed about 270 million (£178 million) had been paid to the Palestinian Authority over a two-year period, with the money going into a single account. “It was all paid into a pot to finance a variety of things, some of them legitimate and some dubious,” he said. He demanded a committee of inquiry into the payments, but the request was vetoed and it is unlikely further investigation will take place.But even as the working group was winding up, new evidence was emerging about the fate of the EU’s cash. Mr Zimeray and Ms Schröder had alsopersuaded OLAF, the anti-fraud office of the EU, to begin its own investigation into what had happened to the money. Its report is not yet out, but already evidence is emerging that some of the money was used to cover the salaries of thousands of security force employees who existed only on paper.An examination of the payroll of the Palestinian Authority’s national security force, under the command of General Haj Ismail Jabber, revealed that about $2 million (£1.1 million) a month was paid to General Jabber to cover the salaries of 37,000 security force members. The payroll showed there were only 30,000 people on the staff. The EU working group may have concluded its investigation, but others are still searching for the truth. Ms Schröder and Mr Z imeray spotted the flaws in the argument this time, but there will have been other occasions, many more, when money has flowed out of the EU coffers without check or balance.What appears to have prompted these two MEPs to place the greater good of the EU above political convenience - and there is no doubt that both would have found life easier over the last year had they ignored the voice of their consciences - is a sense of outrage at the knee-jerk response of the European Parliament to automatically back the Palestinian cause without pausing to consider what would happen to the money they so readily handed over.Too often in Europe decisions are taken without fear of being held to account: on this occasion, the guilty parties have merely had a warning shot fired across their bows. Fraud, corruption and mismanagement are woven into the fabric of the European Parliament, say its critics. It can only be hoped that this time, however hard senior EU powerbrokers attempt to place political convenience ahead of financial probity, it is not the end of the story.

End of Msg
from Chamberlain.

November 1, 2007

Remember Oriana Fallaci

Remember Oriana Fallaci? She had a hard time with the “politically correct” crowd with her last book, because it didn’t toe the liberal line. Here’s an excerpt from an interview with her on the occasion of her new book “The Force of Reason” (from http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/vidino200405040834.asp ).

In 1974, former Algerian President Houari Boumedienne said in a speech at the U.N.: “One day millions of men will leave the southern hemisphere to go to the northern hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends. Because they will go there to conquer it. And they will conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory.” In other words, says Fallaci, what Islamic armies have not been able to do with force in more than 1,000 years can be achieved in less than a century through high birth rates. She cites as evidence a 1975 meeting of Islamic countries in Lahore, in which they announced their project to transform the flow of Muslim immigrants in Europe in “demographic preponderance.”

The “sons of Allah,” as Fallaci calls them, do not make a secret of their plans.”A respected Muslim cleric told the crowd: “Thanks to your democratic laws we will invade you. Thanks to our Islamic laws we will conquer you.” The full interview follows: May 04, 2004, 8:34 a.m.

Forceful Reason

Fallaci issues a wake-up call to Europe.

By Lorenzo Vidino

“Oriana Fallaci” is not a household name in the United States, but it cannot be uttered in Europe without generating a heated reaction. Even though her 2002 book, The Rage and the Pride, was translated into English (by Fallaci herself) and sold many copies in the U.S., it was on the other side of the ocean that intellectuals, politicians, and ordinary citizens passionately debated the views of the celebrated Italian journalist.

The Rage and the Pride is either loved or hated; the positions Fallaci takes in it leave no middle ground. Outraged by the events of 9/11, Fallaci criticizes both Muslims (bent, according to her, on conquering the West and annihilating its culture) and Europeans (described as spoiled, hypocritical, and blind to the mortal threat represented by Islamic expansionism). Fallaci’s views as expressed in the Rage and the Pride caused an uproar in politically correct Europe, death threats and lawsuits included. Now, two years later, Fallaci has published a new book, entitled La Forza della Ragione (The Force of Reason), which continues the discourse she began in The Rage and the Pride.

As its title suggests, The Force of Reason is not dictated by the (sometimes excessive) fury that inspired The Rage and the Pride, but it gives a more accurate explanation of why Europe has decided not to defend its identity and to surrender to what she calls the “Islamic invasion.” With the sarcasm and uniquely direct style that characterizes her work, Fallaci carefully examines the historic and political reasons that have led Europeans to vilify their own culture, consistently embrace anti-Americanism, and pander to every request from the increasingly powerful Muslim communities that populate the dying Old
Continent. Her analysis does not leave much hope for the future of Europe, although she takes a far more optimistic position on her adoptive country, the United States (Fallaci currently lives in New York).

The long introduction to The Force of Reason recounts the intellectual lynching to which Fallaci was subjected following the publication of The Rage and the Pride. The PC establishment, which she refers to as the “Modern Inquisition,” crucified her, submerging her with lawsuits and accusations of being racist and fomenting a religious war. But all of this publicity just played into Fallaci’s hands, as sales of The Rage and the Pride soared into the millions. But what has really struck Fallaci in the wake of The Rage and the Pride are the letters she has received from readers throughout the world.

One of the most significant was written by an Italian, who thanked her for “helping me to understand the things I thought without realizing I was thinking them.” And this is Fallaci’s goal: provoking Europeans into realizing what is going on right under their noses and getting rid of their fear to say something that goes against the PC dogma. According to Fallaci, the “Modern Inquisition” has managed to keep individuals in fear of expressing what they believe: “If you are a Westerner and you say that your civilization is superior, the most developed that this planet has ever seen, you go to the stake. But if you are a son of Allah or one of their collaborationists and you say that Islam has always been a superior civilization, a ray of light…nobody touches you. Nobody sues you. Nobody condemns you.”

Fallaci has her own interpretation of the massive Islamic immigration that is rapidly changing the face of European cities. She sees it as part of the expansionism that has characterized Islam since its birth. After reminding the reader how Islamic armies have aimed for centuries at the heart of Europe (a part of history that is not taught anymore in Europe, since it would offend the sensitivity of Muslim pupils), reaching France, Poland, and Vienna, she lays out her case, claiming that the current flood of immigrants from the Middle East and North Africa is part of a carefully planned strategy. Fallaci uses the words of Muslim leaders to support this thesis.

In 1974, former Algerian President Houari Boumedienne said in a speech at the U.N.: “One day millions of men will leave the southern hemisphere to go to the northern hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends. Because they will go there to conquer it. And they will conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory.” In other words, says Fallaci, what Islamic armies have not been able to do with force in more than 1,000 years can be achieved in less than a century through high birth rates. She cites as evidence a 1975 meeting of Islamic countries in Lahore, in which they announced their project to transform the flow of Muslim immigrants in Europe in “demographic preponderance.”

The “sons of Allah,” as Fallaci calls them, do not make a secret of their plans. A Catholic bishop recounted that, during an interfaith meeting in Turkey, a respected Muslim cleric told the crowd: “Thanks to your democratic laws we will invade you. Thanks to our Islamic laws we will conquer you.” But what really makes Fallaci’s blood boil is the West’s inability to even
acknowledge this aggression. A large part of her book is dedicated to analyzing how the main European countries pander to the arrogant demands of radical Muslim organizations, how they are unable to defend their Jewish citizens from acts of Islamic militant violence (often blamed on neo-Nazis and almost never on the Muslim perpetrators, even when the evidence clearly proves otherwise), and said countries’ unwillingness to be proud of their cultures and identities.

But when and why did Europe become so weak and submissive in the face of its new Islamic masters, a “province of Islam,” as Fallaci calls it? She points the finger squarely at the 1973 oil crisis. Europeans were so afraid of losing their supplies of oil that they decided to pander to the requests of OPEC, discarding Israel and beginning an intense dialogue with Arab countries. From that year on, intellectuals, the media, and politicians have been showered with money for their support of Arab and Islamic causes and numerous lobbying organizations have been created in several European countries. A publication with the ominous title of “Eurabia [about which Bat Yeor has written at length] was created in Paris, and the European parliament established the Parliamentary Association for the Euro-Arabian Cooperation, all part of an Arab-financed effort to influence European politics.

The last chapters of The Force of Reason are dedicated to explaining why Europe’s three main political and social forces (Left, Right, and the Church) gave in to what she calls “the Islamic invasion.” While Fallaci accuses the Left and Right mostly of ignorance and opportunism, her harshest words are left for the Church. Fallaci has been known throughout her long career for her strong anti-clericalism (she is a long-time leftist, daughter of an Italian partisan who fought the Fascists), but describes herself as a “Christian atheist.” While stating that she does not believe in God, she claims that the West cannot ignore its Christian origin and identity. Even if we deny God’s existence, Fallaci says, Christianity has shaped the Western world. It defines “who we are, where we are coming from, and where we are going.”

But the Church, she says, is not able - or worse, not willing - to defend Christianity. Fallaci accuses the Church of helping the expansion of the “Islamic empire,” lobbying for more Muslims to come to Europe. She points out that Christianity offers its churches as shelters to Muslim immigrants, who immediately turn them into mosques, as it has happened repeatedly in France
and Italy. It continuously apologizes for the Crusades, but never expects an apology for what Muslims are doing now to Christians in Sudan or Indonesia.

Amid Falla