The longer they stay, the bigger the number the more crimes they commit

 

The longer they stay, the bigger the number, and the more crimes they commit

Danish version

Extract from : http://avisen.dk/unge-efterkommere-langt-kriminelle-180108.aspx (in Danish):

“Every fifth male descendant of immigrants got at least one sentence in 2005. It’s more than twice as many than among Danish people in the same ages…”  

[...]

 

“22 p.c. – more than every fifth – of male descendants of ages 20-29 years old was convicted for one or more crimes in 2005. The corresponding number for etnic Danes in the same ages was less than the half, 9.8, while 12.5 p.c. of the young immigrants were convicted…”

Today reality is precisely as we have described it to become twenty years ago, and latest a few years ago: The longer they stay here, the worse they become, the average number of births a women rises, they speak our language even more imperfect, and they are more unemployed and more active concerning crimes in second and third generation compared with their parents. We have at least six good reason for counting the immigrants correctly and place the responsibility right: 

Six good reasons: http://www.lilliput-information.com/six.html

Six other good reasons (Danish) : http://danmark.wordpress.com/2007/11/07/de-seks-andre-gode-grunde/

If it continues apparently without any sense of reality and rational reasoning for more than 1-2 years more, and it is not then turned upside down to repatriation Europe’s way into Dark Ages has definitively been chosen by roadmap-marionets who in reality rule this country and Europe.       

 

Complement: The Problem with Islam in Europe: 

 

 Danish women should especially think carefully

Danske kvinder skal tænke sig allermest om:

 

 

http://danmark.wordpress.com/2007/11/12/kvinderne-skal-taenke-sig-mest-om/

 

 Sonia

Europe On Its Way To Dark Ages

Europe shall be darkened –

the political leaders have sold their souls to the oil producing Arabic countries

(new updated version from the original of 5. Mars 2006)

Europe and Islam now and in the future according to numbers

Norway has made its official population forecast 2006 – still without any most needed correction. There is no correction in Sweden and Germany either. The be able to quantified the problem is the basic for any debate. So we hear about numbers that are declining all the time – but it’s a lie. In Denmark you read in Jyllands-Posten 9. August 2005 that the number of foreign citizens begun substantially to decrease from second quarter 2005. All in all we ended up with an official fall in the number of foreign citizens even though the rise of number in a politically incorrect analysis was (numerically) more than three times larger. When you look at the number of foreign citizens in the official accounts, the number of naturalized has been subtracted year after year. So if the number of naturalized exceeds the number of immigrants in a given year, it looks as if the number of foreign citizens has declined and the influx has turn to outflow. This phenomenon has been continuing for years. In Denmark we made a correction and got a politically incorrect but more accurate account.

Perhaps the simple truth after all is too complicated for reporters:

“The camouflage from the number of naturalizations by law just exceeded the number of new immigrants”

The demographic development In Norway : http://www.honestthinking.org/no/pub/HT.2005.05.15.OJA.Bakgrunnsinformasjon_for_artikkel_om_SSB.html (in Norwegian)

The future population of Norway :
http://www.aftenposten.no/meninger/kronikker/article1209423.ece
http://www.meforum.org/article/337 (in Norwegian)

Sweden has Islamic majority about 2050: Report on researcher Jan Lindh’s results: http://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/06/20/svensk-forskerne-svenskerne-i-mindretal/ (in Danish)

A crescent over Europe?
http://www.afa.org/magazine/July2005/0705europe.asp

On the German blog Politically Incorrect run by Stefan Herre we read this entry on the theme: “The Number of Muslims in Germany” with an answer from the Mideast expert and economist Hans-Peter Raddatz: http://www.pi-news.org/2007/10/stefan-herre-about-the-islamization-of-germany/

Europe and Islam: Crescent Waxing, Cultures Clashing: http://www.twq.com/04summer/docs/04summer_savage.pdf

Islam in France: The French Way of Life Is in Danger :

http://www.meforum.org/article/337

From Holland we get positive comments on : http://ayaanhirsiali.web-log.nl/ayaanhirsiali/2008/02/newspapers-repu.html and http://nekklachten.web-log.nl (in Dutch, German or English)

Denmark got the possibility to correct the false numbers of immigrants and their descendants:

In 2006 the number of naturalizations by law for 26 year divided on former citizenship suddenly was published by Danmark’s Statistics.

That lead to correction that shows the official number of most foreign immigrants had to risen by 106 p.c. to reach a politically incorrect but more accurate number.

http://www.lilliput-information.com/uscan.html (English version) and

http://www.lilliput-information.com/eumork.html (older Danish version)

A beginning critical activity seems to take place in Norway I have to say. Norway and Holland are respectively about 10 years behind and 15-20 years ahead of the wrong immigration-development in Denmark. I.e. we will see a majority of Muslims here about 2035-2040, in Norway in about 2050, but in Holland (with a corrected number of about foreigner-percentage in 25-28) they will get the Islamic majority in 2025-2030. There has definitely been a war long before this happens, perhaps a war that will prevent the development to escalate further towards a multietnic chaos, who knows? The war is being orchestrated from Bosnia and Morocco and from within the EU-countries. You don’t believe? See the video: http://www.sky.com/skynews/video/videoplayer/0,,91134-bosnia_p3705,00.html

All European governments continue steadily and calm with the great extention/expansion of a European co-operation to the west and to the south and with promising final inclosure into the Lisbon-Treaty (a camouflaged European constitution), where they perhaps should re-arrange the trade and contacts instead taught by the latest experiences. This co-operation is about “exchange of workforce, education and culture (and immigration)” and surely on money from EU paid to the development-restricted areas in 10 countries south of the Mediterranean. Most likely we should expect our governments to do nothing to prevent or delay of anything in the connection. In addition the Euro is being held floating by Arabic Oil and self-strengthened continuous interest-rate rises caused by the Euro-construction itself. Any kind of support from our busy leaders most likely have to be regarded as non-existing, seen from this point. The Arabic oil countries unfortunately have them very much in their pocket so to say, so much that they will do nothing at best to open up their antiquated systems of education and of the general business-structures under the accelerating international competition. In addition Euro is floating in oil as a payment from the other side with immigrants in return from Middle East and Africa. For details and background:

http://www.lilliput-information.com/curint.htm

http://danmark.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/dollar-is-definitely-not-quite-passe-english-version/

 

To get out of this dilemma is more than difficult:

A series of interest-rate increases simply presses the rate of exchange further up in a Europe with close to zero real growth, and it worsen the conditions further, precise as we described it just before the first referendum on Euro in Denmark. Now they have not even prevented to make inflation again (in Denmark, 13.4 p.c. the latest year) in order just to use this as a false argument for a second referendum on Euro about 2009-2010, when it has went wrong. The interest-rate increases slows down the activity even more on Mainland, and even though the politically incorrect unemployment in reality is close to 20 p.c. of the those who could go to work. The natural rules of capital formation seems to have been forgotten in an indebted Europe. European population and European workforce: http://www.lilliput-information.com/engeufolk.html and http://www.lilliput-information.com/engeuarb.html

Here you could have imagined perhaps a re-arrangement of the trade with most terror-fixated areas of the world assumed that we got our energy-trade directed into safety. Europe could replace the deliveries we get from countries that are expected more and more to use a terroristic policy of trade against the West in the nearest future. In reality Denmark has been self-sufficient with energy resources for the last 20 years. The other alternative was chosen by the leaders: They sold Europe to the men of the hour.

That is the background and the reason why we have to collect and possibly create power of resistance right now. If we don’t succeed the European peoples will not get the needed support in upcoming fight and war that surely will come as sure as the Amen in church. And this war is coming much sooner than the majority expect. Without civil resistance we have lost beforehand. It is 2 minutes to twelve.

If your heart is filled use your brain

Joern E. Vig, M. Sc. (Economics), Denmark

http://www.lilliput-information.com

http://lilliput-information.blogspot.com

http://Danmark.WordPress.com

Drawing illustrates the way back to reality from tax financed welfare - without a war

Back to reality

Most of the European welfare systems are to a very high degree built on tax-payments and public expenditures distributed over the lifetime –the Danish almost entirely. That’s the reason why they were heading for ruin from beginning in 1970s. In Denmark the non-Western immigrants cost the society, in the end the businesses 2.5 mio. ddk a individual in average a lifetime, the Danes cost 750,000 ddk in average (the difference is a factor 3.3). These calculations originate directly from the Danish official Welfare Commission that was reported in the newspaper Boersen 1 December 2005.

Let the green oval illustrate the Danish public sector, and the blue the private, free trading sector in the drawing below.

As matters stand in Denmark it is impossible to force the development from the upper to lower structural relation of sector sizes, because the public sector drains the possibilities of private sector too much to make innovation and expansion along with all the other costs. If we continues to demand a public sector of size almost as at present in the long, there has to be a temporary reduction of the public sector.

There are no other possibilities and the international competition forces us to act today instead of tomorrow or we shall loose every public impact.

The red arrow indicates the impossible choise or the ideological way. The black arrow shows the possible way. There is no other way. If the structures are not changed very soon in the two biggest European nations on the European mainland, and even if international competition combined with the steadily increasing problem of financing welfare made by the increasing share of pensioners and at the same time the decreasing accession to the labour force plus the self-created miss of a solution to the problem with missing European fertility substituted by Middle East fertility and immigration – with the results illustrated in the calculation on Danish relations in the first part – Europe will go bankruptcy again or become an Arab caliphate. ‘Eurabia’ is just an ideological construction with a unwanted distance to reality enjoyed for a short time by the European Elite.

Until now they have chosen to lie about matters and surrender to Arabic oil countries and/or face another war. The more years the solution is postponed the bigger the collapse. It is pure mathematic.

Jens

‘The dollar is definitely not quite passé’

President of Iran Mahmoud Ahmadinehad recently used the following expression about the American currency dollar at the meeting with the oil producers in Saudi Arabia: “A worthless piece of paper”.

The American dollar has since the last global war (WW2) been substantial overestimated, because USA made an agreement with Saudi Arabia on oil extraction and on foreign and security policy on way home from the Jalta Conference 4-11 February 1945.

It developed further on and petro dollar kept its rate of exchange at a level higher than corresponding to USA’s ability to compete. The dollar was simply kept up, because an enormous amount of monetary units from the oil trade remained abroad and did not returned to USA to demand goods. Dollars was demanded everywhere after WW2.

This phenomenon has the American government aimed to reverse to get closer to its ability to compete in a globalizing world since 2000. In addition Iran was one of the first oil countries that replaced its oil trade to the European compulsory Euro in the Euro-Zone.

A lot of rumours are told - also in Denmark. On the anti-war front it is often reported that USA
is close to bankruptcy. Let me express it in this way: This rumour does distinctly not build on any insight at all. The war expenditures - that is mentioned in this connection - are mostly financed by government bonds. A substantial amount of those has been sold to among others China. This is a kind of safety net, ‘where the believers had hoped they had found a dead dog burried’. It’s just about the time to remember ‘Funny Ali’.

The war of interest-rates that actually has been fought across the Atlantic - as usual I am tempted to remark - has among other things the effect that EU with a strong oil trading currency has severe difficulties with getting the real economy of EU going toward a popular succes. They chose what we have called New-Merkantilism instead of making order on the home front. ‘Naturally it is quite different in Demark, as you might imagine or perhaps heard’. Anyhow we have explained earlier why the Euro is not a protection against international competition, and why the currency rate and speculation do not secure any dynamic capital creation that is the precondition for every responsible society in development, rather on the contrary.

That a new alliance between the Arabic countries and EU - the Mediterranean Process - is emerging might be overlooked by a few ‘weak-sighted’, even though the efforts has been held semi-secrete by the chosen ones and the European Elite. That is perhaps the reason why Iran uses this rhetoric. In addition there is still a lot of sanctions intact against Iran, and a continuing international claim of an effective control with its atomic program.

19 November 2007
J. E. Vig, M. sc. (Economics)
Denmark
informationomdanmark@yahoo.com
http://www.lilliput-information.com
http://Danmark.wordpress.com

A new international monetary system shall be needed