Dissidentpress

July 15, 2007

Immigration-costs in Sweden amounts to almost 29.7 p.c. of the public budget (in 2001)

Immigration-costs in Sweden
amount to almost 29.7 p.c. of the public budget (in 2001)

Dansk udgave

It is the largest expenditure on the public Swedish Budget, but you cannot find it. Associated professor Lars Jansson publiced the book ‘Mångfall eller Välfärd’ in 2002. Latest Jansson refers to the period The Economist from June 2003 that writes Sweden is tortured by big economic problems caused by the burdens of the tremendous immigration, and that Sweden is the poorest country in Scandinavia today.

In the preface of the book Jansson writes: “The Swedes cliam information of the price of immigration, and how it has been financed. The immigrants cause the biggest expenditure of the public budget. Every municipality ought to give the information about the price of immigration.” Jansson estimates the immigration cost of the Swedish state to $33 bill. And refers to that just $778 mio has been shown on the Swedish public budget.

(In Swedish:)
Lars Janssons original calculation method is shown in the book “Mångkultur eller välfärd”, June 2002.

The economic load of Denmark caused by the foreign immigrants amounted officially to $1.63 bill. of a total public budget of about $86 bill. We had to correct this strongly misleading official expenditure: In 1997 the immigrant load in Denmark amounted to more than $15 bill., in 2001 to more than $22 bill.

Documentation of the corrected immigrant-expenditure in Denmark: http://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/06/21/immigrant-load/

When Sweden has more than the doubled number of immigrants compared with Denmark and also a substantial extra unemployment we find it a little funny to experience that the immigrants officially just cost a little more than the half of those in Denmark.

The load–budget has earlier been used to estimate expenditures of children, pensioners and school-children in Denmark.

The $22 bill. in Denmark is an estimate of course, but it is light years closer to reality than the public figure that does not even pay the rent of the flats of the immigrants.

After the Danish Welfare Commission wrote in the newspaper Borsen December 1st 2005 that the foreign immigrants consume 40 p.c. of the total welfare in Denmark caused by the facts that they are paid transfers and consume public service more than three times as often compared with the Danes, our calculation has become a little easier. Thanks to the commission.

In Sweden and in Denmark the power brokers have chosen the welfare-consuming foreigners and do without welfare to the weakest Danes already.

England 2006, Immigrants drain the economy:
http://www.bnp.org.uk/news_detail.php?newsId=1118

Jansson wrote: “A relatively expensive welfare was chosen in Sweden as well as in Denmark caused by a collective tax-financing over a lifetime (not taking or even taking into account the droping of fertility among Westeners). But the need for jobs has also driven the cost of the immigrants to destructive proportions.”

The Swedish and the Danish alternative calculation of the immigrant-load are totally independent, but the result is that the doubled number of immigrants cost about the doubled amount of money in almost the same culture. Not surprising, I hope.

But will the power brokers take the consequence of this?
http://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/05/18/real-welfare-real-globalization/

Latest update concerning Sweden (In Swedish:) Invandringens Ekonomi januar 2004 en sammenligning af Lars Janssons og Jan Ekbergs beregningmetoder: http://www.bgf.nu/kostnader/ie.html

Jens

Complement dealing with the actual results of tax-financed welfare model (including the decreasing and matching fertility) :

http://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/06/14/welfare-for-40-years-and-the-results/
https://dissidentpress.wordpress.com/2007/03/10/will-the-welfare-be-re-arranged/

July 11, 2007

Hope you have figured out why some people lie

Filed under: perspectives, Research — jensn @ 4:13 pm

iod

Collects and transmits the politically incorrect information, the one the menthal-robots don’t want to know, because the truth threatens the cyberspace or scrap that the authorities feed them with daily.

Hope you have figured out why some people lie

When everything fails try the truth that is the opposite of lies

The press and the media are unfree

Fortunately, at least one highly-respected journalist has publicly confessed that this is indeed the case. Asked to give a toast before the prestigious New York Press Club in 1953, John Swinton, the former Chief of Staff at the NEW YORK TIMES, made this candid confession [it’s worth nothing that Swinton was called “The Dean of His Profession” by other newsmen, who admired him greatly]:

“There is no such thing, at this date of the world’s history, as an independent press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinions out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job.If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone. The business of the journalist is to destroy the truth; to lie outright; to pervert; to vilify; to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell the country for his daily bread. You know it and I know it and what folly is this toasting an independent press. We are the tools and vassals of the rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.” (end of quotation)

To document that you really live in a cyberspace of information I do not hope you have to read what they tell us themselves:

http://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/10/10/what-some-people-who-ought-to-know-said/

Jensn

July 2, 2007

Two of the hunted foreign terrorists in Britain are psysisists – ‘extemely calming’ – and it is even worse

Filed under: Islam, perspectives, Research, satire, Terror, Terrorism — jensn @ 12:20 pm

The most stupid and unqualified terror-attacks ever attempted

Extracts from: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6259924.stm

“Police are urgently hunting at least one person over attempted car bombings in London and at Glasgow airport.

Five people – none thought to be British – have been arrested so far in Paisley, Liverpool and Cheshire…”

[…]

“…On Monday, Staffordshire Police closed off Priam Close, in Bradwell, not far from Chesterton, where one of the people being held, Dr Mohammed Asha, lived.

Dr Asha, who worked as a junior doctor at the Royal Shrewsbury Hospital and the Princess Royal Hospital in Telford, was arrested on the M6 in Cheshire on Saturday night…”

——————

Two of the suspects are physisists; it is extremely calming to know that Denmark also plans two import more of those and and other heath care workers from South-Asia and the Middle East. To the ‘clever’ argument: THEY ARE NOT SO ALL OF THEM, we have to reply with question: Would you please sort them, and tell us which percentage to accept just before one of your family has to be treated?!

To get a clue

Latest:

7 arrested Middle Easteners, two of them doctors, one is still hunted. The one doctor drove the car into the terminal in Glasgow. They are all linked to the London car bombs with gasolin, gas and nails.

Even later:

Of 8 5 were doctors and 2 other health care workers. 45 muslim doctors plan to attack USA from inside.

Lots of details:
http://edition.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe/07/02/britain.doctor/index.html
Jens

Blog at WordPress.com.