Dissidentpress

February 8, 2008

The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design

Filed under: Blogroll, Evolution, Ideology contra Reality, perspectives, Research — jensn @ 10:37 pm

The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design

by Jonathan Wells

Excerpt from: http://www.regnery.com/books/pigdarwin.html

“Why Darwinism—like Marxism and Freudianism before it—is headed for extinction.

In the 1925 Scopes trial, the American Civil Liberties Union sued to allow the teaching of Darwin’s theory of evolution in public schools. Seventy-five years later, in Kitzmiller v. Dover, the ACLU sued to prevent the teaching of an alternative to Darwin’s theory known as “Intelligent Design”—and won. Why did the ACLU turn from defending the free-speech rights of Darwinists to silencing their opponents? Jonathan Wells reveals that, for today’s Darwinists, there may be no other choice: unable to fend off growing challenges from scientists, or to compete with rival theories better adapted to the latest evidence, Darwinism—like Marxism and Freudianism before it—is simply unfit to survive…”

Darwin stolede ikke selv på den (in Danish)

 

Sonia

Supplement (in Danish)

 

7 Comments »

  1. What growing challenge?
    They did so simply because Intelligent Design is simply not science. It is no more than that.

    Comment by Matt — February 9, 2008 @ 12:09 am

  2. Neither are Darwin’s incomplete evolution-theory-snatchs. He admited so on his deathbed.
    He had been writing for the time spirit. An evolution-theory is bound to include several
    well-founded scientific area, and they all come to different conclusions on almost all
    points. The link on Darwin is unfortunately in Danish. You could try this instead:
    http://human-nature.com/dm/chap1.html

    ‘Assumption-logic’ is all theory. Hope you will realized to take good care when you choose
    your assumptions.

    Sonia

    Comment by jensn — February 9, 2008 @ 4:06 pm

  3. THE NEW DISCIPLINE!

    Things will never be the same in academia after this.

    There is a new discipline on the scene: physical science, the old science of cause and effect.
    Against the backdrop of a nation embroiled in debate and legal battles over whether creationism or evolution, or both, should be taught in the classroom, The Quest for Right proclaims a

    DAY OF VICTORY!

    The Quest for Right, a series of seven textbooks designed for the public schools, represents the ultimate marriage between an in-depth knowledge of biblical phenomena and natural and physical sciences. As a result, the several volumes have accomplished that which, heretofore, was deemed impossible: to level the playing field between those who desire a return to physical science in the classroom and those who embrace the theory of evolution. The Quest for Right turns the tide by providing an authoritative and enlightening scientific explanation of natural phenomena which will ultimately replace the unprofitable Darwinian view.

    The backbone of Darwinism is not biological evolution per se, but electronic interpretation, the tenet that all physical, chemical, and biological processes result from a change in the electron structure of the atom which, in turn, may be deciphered through the orderly application of mathematics, as outlined in quantum mechanics. A few of the supporting theories are: degrading stars, neutron stars, black holes, extraterrestrial water, antimatter, the absolute dating systems, and the big bang, the explosion of a singularity infinitely smaller than the dot of an “i” from which space, time, and the massive stellar bodies supposedly sprang into being.

    The philosophy rejects any divine intervention. Therefore, let the philosophy of Darwinism be judged on these specifics: electron interpretation and quantum mechanics. Conversely, the view that God is both responsible for and rules all the phenomena of the universe will stand or fall when the facts are applied. The view will not hinge on faith alone, but will be tested by the weightier principle of verifiable truths – the new discipline.

    The Quest for Right is not only better at explaining natural phenomena, but also may be verified through testing. As a result, the material in the several volumes will not violate the so-called constitutional separation of church and state. Physical science, the old science of cause and effect, will have a long-term sustainability, replacing irresponsible doctrines based on whim. Teachers and students will rejoice in the simplicity of earthly phenomena when entertained by the new discipline. You will not want to miss the adventure of a lifetime that awaits you in Volume 1 of The Quest for Right, by C. David Parsons.

    Visit the official website for additional information: http://questforright.com/

    “A book that will change the world.” – Wayne Lin, Editor, Tate Publishing LLC

    The Quest for Right in the news:

    Feb. 5th – Shipped 200 copies of Volume 1 to concerned educators, religious leaders, and politicians in Florida. Even as you read this, the books are on their desks.

    Feb. 11th – Author C. David Parsons will be a guest on Changing Worldviews Talk Radio, hosted by Sharon Hughes. Sharon is one of the top conservative female commentators in America. Real and relevant for today’s women in today’s world. If it affects your life, we talk about it.

    Mar. 2008 – Some 550 additional copies are slated to be shipped to Texas and South Carolina.

    Comment by C. David Parsons — February 9, 2008 @ 4:53 pm

  4. He admited so on his deathbed.

    Excuse me? That fallacy has been debunked so many times I’m surprised anyone actually still tries to use it. That is simply a false claim, just like the one about Darwin converting back to god just before he died.

    I’m also having a hard time understanding your reply. I assume that is because English is a second language to you, Danish being your primary one.
    But it is this simple; there has been no theory or hypothesis brought forward which, when tested, has even come close to explaining the available evidence nearly as well as Evolution has for over a century now.

    Now, did Darwin get things wrong? Yes, he did get a great deal wrong in his original papers. Has the theory of evolution changed since then? Yes, of course it has. Which is the utter brilliance of the scientific method – scientists are not afraid, when faced with new data and evidence, to say “Oh, what we thought is wrong, let’s examine this new stuff and see what parts of our theory need modification.”

    Comment by Matt — February 9, 2008 @ 9:51 pm

  5. Not even a deductive theory of evolution has ever been developed, no matter what you might think or believe.

    Evolution has on the other hand heavily been forced into an ideologic interpretation, just by Conservatives,
    Liberals, Socialists, both National Socialists and International Socialists, Communists with the big Sesam-Sesam-words: Surviving of the fittist….but the Sesam-words always sounded from the top.
    And that is rather quite calming: Those ideologists obvious run for the same aim.
    ‘Surviving of the most disciplined gregarious animals’ could not have had the same impact.

    I have made no claims of religious kind.
    I only tell you: It is possible that you descend from the apes, but it certainly has not been proven that I do.

    Sincerely
    Jens

    PS: I am sure you understand my imperfect English. Try Danish, and you will be able to read my comprehensive documentation refered to on the link in the entry.

    Comment by jensn — February 11, 2008 @ 10:55 pm

  6. Нормально, можно cделать маленький сборник.

    Comment by LikeGermany — April 14, 2010 @ 7:56 pm

    • After having translated I do not understand either:

      “Normally, you can set as a small collection” (???)

      Comment by jensn — April 14, 2010 @ 9:50 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: