Dissidentpress

February 21, 2011

Financial Crises – You Have Not Seen The End – Fiat Money For About 40 Years Is Not Removed In 2-3 Years

Financial crisis and the value crisis – let’s have it all – is unfortunately repited as a natural thing as long as people has bad manners

The late 1990s: First the shares were filled with hot air by companies that began to issue more and more paper, and when rates continued to rise in certain key industries, which was wildly exaggerated by the media, it was quite a fad to buy shares and offering equity securities, now savings rates at banks were of no special interest anymore. First they speculated themselves cross-eyed at an IT boom, then housing prices started to increase, the credit was even extended tgo accelerate speculation and the same were tax-funded grants to property owners via legislation in the last phase (in Denmark). Can the responsibility be placed ? Easy.

Sometimes in August 2001, we could read in the papers “So let the kids, indeed”; ‘they should invest their savings in the stock market’. ‘It goes so well and we were all so rich’. And it was a lie. “More speculation, thanks” was the title of an article in Berlingske Tidende. It contained additionally only empty talk, so no information.

The dividend that companies were expected to give was no longer created by ordinary business expectations for the future, as it appeared. It was determined by the share prices determined by supply and demand for capital gain by buying and selling (stock) paper.

Companies in large numbers were recorded and publicly available on the market to get capital – they actual earned too little many of them in the normal way (hush, hush!). The IPO could obviously only be done by showing good financial results. Here you had to have  a good accountant if you had troubles, and sometimes even a good relationship with his bank too.

Investment in shares that are supplied assiduously, deliver needed or much coveted capital – perhaps it actually had been impossible the earn comparing amounts by ordinary economic activities and will be even more difficult in the future with alle those demanding papers, and perhaps almost all the dividend-oriented shareholders expected what other share supplier seem to able to give. Perhaps this was a reason for a great deal to jump on the wagon, the speculator-wagon, now they got the chance.

The possibility existed now: You and several others invested well advised (effectively anyway) by banks and by the press. Others did the same, and eventually the share rates began to rise, but just because all or many small ones in market would invest. Shares had been made interesting for regular people with various games in the newspapers and everything else had been done to prepared the show.

The share price did not increase because the company showed rising earnings from – remember this! – what indeed was its appointed task to produce and sell. But rates rose and more increases came in because more share were demanded than could be supplied, it was a game, simply because purchasing power was present or there could be borrowed for the messy project too, and then because the company offered more and more papers for sale in an apparently insatiable market. It all went to the papers. But what about the ordinary activities of the business? The press shouted out daily in the recovery, recovery rates increases – in order to maintain the illusion of a boom. The reality was:

Rates and expectations for future returns in the business would soon join reality. The race was run already in 1999.
Come on, join the party before its too late, because it certainly will get too late? It was too late! When I heard the midst of the madness that phone provider for Nokia few years earlier made an annual profit, 50% higher than the year before, and  simultaneously, the rate of Nokia shares – meaning  the expected value of each krona invested in Nokia – fell by 50% over the same period, something had gone completely wrong, either with expectations — which is what determines the share price – and/or the issuance of new shares and the corresponding influx of new equity, which had flowed to join the firm. There were many others.

It could also be different: rates rose, but prices were just expectations of future returns, which could not hold because the company could not meet the enormous demands which gains asked for – low or no yields calculated from the face value helped a lot on the tour further round and round on roundabout, but eventually the ordinary shareholder found out that it did not help to throw more paper into the market, perhaps the security meant something, and the role as ordinary controller investors meant something yet. In other places constructions developed that meant some key figures and some directors could steal the invested capital instead of incorporating it in the business’ activity.

The fact was that firms in large scale had been unable to manage the capital resulting from share sales in a responsible manner, without even resorting to speculation. The media scream continued daily for recovery which, when you listened, should be understand as if it simply no end would take. And it was a lie. The underlying idea could very well be getting the accidents divided/distributed to the latecomers now the madness had been running too long. How beautiful. Instead of making money from ordinary business activities one could still retrieve capital through share sale, more and more until shares were not able to make interest/yield dividends by any profitable activity – be it real production or by speculation.

So politicians opened opportunities for increased credit in houses and easier access to houses and other properties paid on credit. So almost all owners (old and new) could be involved in “making money” without doing anything. Companies and banks also jumped on the bandwagon.
Accidents that were started were again divided into many more. Then the options were exhausted, and there were no other/more speculation objects back other than pyramid schemes – that’s it …. like in Albania.

I addition the last row of houses and buildings gave an extra volume of “Distorting consumption employment” for a short time to the short-sighted politicians of all kinds, as we reported, when the purchasing power was pulled out by circulation of the houses and buildings and over-indebtedness of inflated values and devalued liabilities and the difference was then consumed. Nobody had actually earned money, but the businesses adapted it as real economics so it becomes much worse afterwards when it shows it self to be funny economics.

All together money devastation and destruction of valuations to keep the speculation started with good faith in the lie – called the ‘trust’ from the ordinary in the media industry.

At last the market real estate was involved as the last way. Weaker settlements of loans created the last rest og fiat money to be spent on an economy that certainly is not developing by spending, but by earning money. Real estate prices naturally flew to the sky and ended after the lending-feast with a naturally fall as well. Final result: Often you then owed a lot more than you owned. Everything is natural, and it was made by the government and the banks together all over the Western world almost on census. Bad manners taught from the top.

From 2007: Financial Crisis

They had to exchange the Secretary of Economics in most countries, because you cannot have a so-called resposible telling the opposite things with a timelag of just 1/2-1 year.  

2007-2008: The banks had to have friends in government to get what did not have, because the government have nothing. Banks on social security, but what a security. Let’s call it what it is a postponement.

Real capital is the quintessence of those goods that produces the means of our consumption, and that maintains itself while the production is going on. Capital as a function. The permanent real capital are bind for a longer period in land, buildings and equipment, eventually in inventory. The floating capital is bound in the input of factors in the process of production while this process is running, and eventually in the inventory. The process of production will typically be repeated.

Private capital is characterized by the sum of rights that permits unearned income (often in form of interest and profit due to appreciation), where it is not possible to show any connection to productive activity.

The capital formation should be concentrated in production to satisfy the all kind of needs including the needs of meaningful activity of the labour. The natural order will always turn capital formation in this most profitable real direction among human beings in the long run. But there has never been and never will be a natural order thanks to the politicians acting within an ineffective constitutional protection of the citizens.

Only with this interference the capital formation is directed the stream into private capitalization instead or abroad. As it gets worser the politicians have to incur debt by the international bankers, because all the money issuing at home gets the prices of our goods to rise further than the competition allows. The papers (shares and bonds) in the private limited company and the state-debt-bonds make it even worser. The purchasing power has been pulled out of real production by to high wages, made too high by the too high taxes, both of them simply drains the real capital to private interest earning capital outside the production. You cannot claim that all political leaders are just as insane as all the others all the time.

An example: If you get a public subsidy covering a part of the cost in order to prompt you to renew your apartment houses but without collecting the necessary amount of money by taxation, perhaps I would ask why you did not renew the houses without the public subsidy, and while you are being very fond of the public subsidy, perhaps I will also try to get a public subsidy to renew those houses of mine. The raison to the public inter-ference is the political problems in this case following the increasing unemployment also caused by political interference and the monopoly (read close to dictatorship) of the trade unions. They are talking about renewing the towns. That is a lie. There are several other cases collected from the ideology on the life of the so-called good people that every modern politician literally has to live on. With the public subsidy the rents of the apartments increases perhaps 15-20 p.c., and the so-called value of the apartment houses increases with the capitalization of this increase (the present value of the yearly of monthly increases). When the total rent of the apartments of Copenhagen from 1914 to 1926 increased with more than 40 mill. ddk. a year the fine originators have without the society had become richer created about 500 mill.ddk more private capital, realized, when the apartment houses were sold. That is the capitalization of 40 mill. kr. a year anno 1925. A big part of this amount ran into consumption. In WW a surplus capitalization was made by the share and bond markets and by loans used to pay dividends accounted on a false basis of the values of inventory and equipment.

Historical Review:

Read Professor Lauritz V. Birck and the Danish History Of Ship Companies 1912-1920 (and about The Crash Of Landmandsbanken, in Danish http://www.lilliput-information.com/economics/app3.html .)

Denmark was very close to the limit of bankruptcy 1923 thanks to our fine President of the centralbank Rubin and Brandes in the Department of Finances, who prefered to finance the unsatisfied needs and the unpleasantness of the war by loans, and then planned to let the small-holders’ values collapse after the war.

While they were dancing and at last were dying in paper money issued by fraud in USA the prices double more times in Denmark in the beginning of 1920s. Enormous fortunes were collected on private hands, while the state just through bonds into the market. If the state had collected a taxation on fortunes once and for all in 1919 instead of telling the people that you can finance a war with nothing, Denmark would not have had any very serious problems later on. Instead they let the inflation run directly into deflation, where all values (real capital) began to be destroyed.

You have capitalized the possibilities of the future yield and trained the propertied classes to believe that war is a good business, the best investment at all. But you forgot to give them a lecture on the uncertainty of exchange rates, of the rate of interest and of the purchasing power to unspecialized (uneducated) individuals.

The real problem is not that people do not live twice here on the Earth. Their experience is just imperfect when it comes to reality, to real life, and this fact has been used time after time.

Some will try to learn from books and studies. But is not easy even if you are pretty clever. In four years 1935-1939 the concept state debt totally lost its meaning. In 1935 it meant everything, in 1939 it meant nothing. If you asked the logical question following this nonsense in the 1969 you got an answer from the professor saying between the lines that you had not understood anything at all. You certainly have to be strong as a 19 years old country boy.

A little from accurated financial history

A few quotations: Under “Must national debt be paid back”?

“…it is not a natural law that national debt ever should be paid back. The state must naturally pay back a loan, when the payments have to be paid, but if it is not convinient to decrease the debt, the payback can always be done by taking another loan… It is true by both raising a loan and by paying back that the only thing that matters is in what way it effects the economic life or the welfare of the society. There can not be given grounds for paying back national debt, if the effects that the paying back has is not wanted. If there is strong demand for labour under full employment at a moment in the society, the result can only be higher wage that necessary will lead to a rise in the prices, then it is perhaps convinient to collect more tax than necessary to cover the running expenditures, that means pay back the debt, because in that way the demand for resources will decrease. Before such condition has occured or better, before you wish to reduce the demand and the income of the society or a least stop its increasing, there obviously can not be given grounds for reducing the national debt…”

“When the state (on the other hand) is paying out money, it always receives the most of the amount from one or more citizens, and directly it creates an income in this way that correspond to the expenditure reduced by the part that goes abroad. If we for a moment assume that there is balance of the payments understood, as to every increase in import there is an export increase of the same amount, there is created with every expenditure an income of the magnitude in the society”.

“If the state in the same tempo, as it gives money away, collects taxes that are paid of means that the taxpayers otherwise would have given out for demand, or raises a loan that is yielded from money, that on the other hand would have been given out for labor and materials, there will obvious not neither be a smaller nor a larger total income in society, the only thing that happens is that the state now confiscates some resources that on the other hand would have been confiscated to private purposes, or would have benefited other persons than those who have the money now”.

“If the state on the other hand get the concerned money by taking it from its account in the national bank and the national bank does not tightening the credit elsewhere, or the state borrow on the market of bonds and the national bank by convinient buying of bonds prevents a fall in the courses, the expenditure of the state means (not alone) that there is created directly a whole new income of the same amount, but that those, who receive the money, again give some of it to people, who once again increases the expenditures. In this way an expenditure of the state creates for example within a year an increase in the income of the society in the same year, an income that perhaps is 23 times bigger than the paid out amount of money, and because the taxes in this country with the existing laws of taxation are about 25 p.c. of the income, will such an expenditure in the concerned or the next year perhaps give the state and municipalities an increasing tax income to an amount the half or three forth of the amount that can be the basic of the new expenditures or it can be used for lowering the taxes”.

Under “The balance sheet of the state”:

“If you actually want to operate with an idea of balanced sheet of the state as an expression of its economic situation, it must be the ability of the citizens to pay taxes compared with the expenditures that state is planning..” (unquote of the later Professor and Rockefeller Fellow Joergen Pedersen in: ‘Topical Economies Problems’, 1939)

Keynesianism, that Joergen Pedersen here is making marketing for, deals with problems of the society in a very unrealistic way. They are made to formulations of problems in a mathematical language of symbols or something just as limited, there has to be cleared up (as here) a logical, coherent chain of thoughts that neither fit the problem, as it really is, nor include all those things that practically effects the solution of the problem.

For example the influence on the economy of the funds, and the inflation have an inferior place in the works of Keynes and in the works of his epigones.

The same can be said about the national debt, as it appears. The new system (at that time) that should be built up in the after war period, should give exactly free admission to incur national debt. And it certainly did.

The targets for the society are always something like employment, activity and similar. The effect of the public sector on the economy is not interesting to a Keynesian, and you will at once be in doubt if the declared targets for the economy are anything but to ‘the exterior’ opinion, as Keynes himself called it, before he won the Nobel Prize (se below).

The whole entrance to the Keynesian way of thinking gives evidence of a fatal need of interest of reality, for example if the assumption all together and each of them draw a true picture of the reality at all, and then this cyberspace reality that they seek to give predictions to. It will be a special problem to the Keynesian to try to cover himself up behind assumptions all the time, so what he has said, is logic, when all assumptions have been remembered. If these logical relations, scholastic rides tell anything about the effects of different political economic actions from the authorities towards some correctly described phenomena in the society do not in principle interest the Keynesian. Here he has secured his retreat. It is a very central part of the Keynesian learning to train this. I have trained myself until I could not take more lies. My upbringing simply forbad me to continue the lies.

Therefore I must say: Do not listen to the Keynesian, he will coax you to do, what he believe in, and if you do not understand, what he is telling you, he will explain to you at last by referring to your lack of education (scholastic).

Precicely the same method that what used about 100 years before when you was explain why the gold standard what mattered

I have to inform you that the Danish Joergen Pedersen, who became a Rockefeller Fellow, perhaps could have won the Nobel Prize instead of John M. Keynes. Pedersen was not very known in the Swedish Academy, and many of his earlier writings were not written in English.

 

The practical rediscovery:

From 1994 they were talking about paying back the national debt in Denmark. But nothing of the kind happens, the debt still rises every year until recently (2006). If the national debt was beginning to be paid back the unemployment would increase, the keynesians would tell you. The unemployment in Denmark is between 500,000 and 700,000 or 17-24 p.c. of the laborforce in 1999. I have tried to give an total presentation of the unemployment-accounts-problems on: http://www.lilliput-information.com/led/index.html (in Danish).

Pupils who always work and always talk, tell you that the unemployment in Denmark is less than 150,000. That is the figure when you when you concentrate on the unemployed members of unemployment security system. The expelled ones do not exist. They did not in the Soviet Union and DDR either.

In 1933 the unemployment was 33 p.c. (the highest ever in Denmark) of the labor force (accounted in 1933). In September 1939 (when the World War II broke out) the unemployment increased 16,000, even if 20,000-30,000 were called to the military forces. In the years before unemployment had been reduced by public occupational work (‘New economics’, ‘Recovery’ or ‘New Deal’ made in USA), by exporting more to Germany, which were preparing for war, and by national debt, that means transforming more and more real capital to private capital.

At this time the unemployment were especially reduced by the Keynesian so-called ‘kickstarting’ operations. That the money was destroyed in this way did nearly nobody discover, because the war also made a new international monetary system that was based entirely on credit economy alone and and paper that is the same.

That the effect of this blind using of the theories of Keynes led to a public sector ruled by bureaucratic principles, a public sector that was a good deal larger than the things ruled by private, individual dispositions, and a colossal national debt ought to have been foreseen, but the theories did very convenient not tell this, the theories that were followed blind for 70 years. The dictatorship based on the nonsense writings by Karl Marx also lasted for 70 years. Nothing has been left to uncertainty if you look in right direction.

How should an unskilled individual know what to do? That is the reason why I got the right to vote.

A little accuracy about the between war period:

John Galbraight still maintains the German economy recovered from 1933 by civil production, and he intend to let us believe that the German method was a kind of the so-called new economics. He seems to want us to forget a lot. In 1932 4.1 mill. Germans were unemployed. Two years later the number had been reduced to 2,4 mill. In 1998 (the election year) the unemployment in Germany with nearly the same population as in 1933 was officially 4,3 mill. The SPD-politicians just before the election to the Bundestag maintained that this number was not correct. The real or the true number was about 10 mill. (the same four years later at the next election 2002). In the late 1920s and the beginning of the 1930s the motorization came as a gift from the technical knowledge, the arming had been started, and productions and development of arms had long been going on in cooperation with the Soviet Union (unofficially). A restrictive control of the currency, tax discount tickets, and especially the suspension of the trade union wage rates was the axis of the German recovery policy from 1933.

Debt, inflation, deflation and mass unemployment caused by the concentration of power and ignorance, as uninformed citizens to reign of. Business owners can be greedy, just as trade unions, but national debt, inflation, deflation and mass unemployment they are not able to do, if not the governments and their officials played with, those who prudently are living on these instruments.
Then comes the collapse:

It happens mostly once in an average lifetime (so there is not many opportunities to get used to it) and it becomes very worse this time. This is because fundamentally human attributes when the underlying morals and ethics go from the top of the flute and down, mind you.

Professor L. V. Birck wrote in 1922:

“We live in a world where ‘state machine’ we in fact would sit to have weakened in its foundation. It is hated by the rich and barely tolerated by the poor. In Germany and Austria are the holders of the economic power of organized society capital is thought to to destroy the so-called parliamentary democracy and the population influenced government to take power themselves. In the United States is the conflict between the political and economic temporary deferred because the political power at the last presidential election has declined in hands of a political oligarchy (my: oligarchy oligarchy means). Everywhere we find evidence of state powerlessness and the possibility that
establish the power outside the law and without oligarchy seem very distant for moment “(I quote from:” Denmark and the World Crisis “).

Professor L.V. Birck also wrote of a lifetime ago:

“Citizenship was shortsighted, it would not save the system, even sitting in, getting the amount of paper out of the world, which threatened to strangle the economic system, which involves citizenship. ”
The same is happening today in a even wilder scale. What happens when government intervenes?
Nothing new under the sun.

Fraud, but not from speculators alone.
Can it be arranged so that speculation does not pay off? (English version)

J. E. Vig, M. Sc. (Economics)

Supplement:

http://www.lilliput-information.com/economics/tida.html

http://www.lilliput-information.com/economics/gol2/gol2.html

http://www.lilliput-information.com/economics/intmo.html

February 10, 2011

Meltdown of the monetary system is not new

Meltdown of the monetary system is not new

From the laws of nature versus laws of humanity

– no insurmountably terminological shallow-like clichés included

 

Real capital is the quintessence of those goods that produces the means of our consumption, and that maintains itself while the production is going on. Capital as a function. The permanent real capital are bind for a longer period in land, buildings and equipment, eventually in inventory. The floating capital is bound in the input of factors in the process of production while this process is running, and eventually in the inventory. The process of production will typically be repeated.

Private capital is characterized by the sum of rights that permits unearned income (often in form of interest and profit due to appreciation), where it is not possible to show any connection to productive activity.

The capital formation should be concentrated in production to satisfy the all kind of needs including the needs of meaningful activity of the labour. The natural order will always turn capital formation in this most profitable real direction among human beings in the long run. But there has never been and never will be a natural order thanks to the politicians acting within an ineffective constitutional protection of the citizens.

Only with this interference the capital formation is directed the stream into private capitalization instead or abroad. As it gets worser the politicians have to incur debt by the international bankers, because all the money issuing at home gets the prices of our goods to rise further than the competition allows. The papers (shares and bonds) in the private limited company and the state-debt-bonds make it even worser. The purchasing power has been pulled out of real production by to high wages, made too high by the too high taxes, both of them simply drains the real capital to private interest earning capital outside the production.

You cannot claim that all political leaders are just as insane as all the others all the time.

An example:If you get a public subsidy covering a part of the cost in order to prompt you to renew your apartment houses but without collecting the necessary amount of money by taxation, perhaps I would ask why you did not renew the houses without the public subsidy, and while you are being very fond of the public subsidy, perhaps I will also try to get a public subsidy to renew those houses of mine. The raison to the public interference is the political problems in this case following the increasing unemployment also caused by political interference and the monopoly (read close to dictatorship) of the trade unions. They are talking about renewing the towns. That is a lie. There are several other cases collected from the ideology on the life of the so-called good people that every modern politician literally has to live on. With the public subsidy the rents of the apartments increases perhaps 15-20 p.c., and the so-called value of the apartment houses increases with the capitalization of this increase (the present value of the yearly of monthly increases). When the total rent of the apartments of Copenhagen from 1914 to 1926 increased with more than 40 mill. ddk. a year the fine originators have without the society had become richer created about 500 mill.ddk more private capital, realized, when the apartment houses were sold. That is the capitalization of 40 mill. ddk. a year anno 1925. A big part of this amount ran into consumption. In WW a surplus capitalization was made by the share and bond markets and by loans used to pay dividends accounted on a false basis of the values of inventory and equipment.

Denmark was very close to the limit of bankruptcy 1923 thanks to our fine President of the centralbank Rubin and Brandes in the Department of Finances, who prefered to finance the unsatisfied needs and the unpleasantness of the war by loans, and then planned to let the small-holders’ values collapse after the war.

While they were dancing and at last were dying in paper money issued by fraud in USA the prices double more times in Denmark in the beginning of 1920s. Enormous fortunes were collected on private hands, while the state just through bonds into the market. If the state had collected a taxation on fortunes once and for all in 1919 instead of telling the people that you can finance a war with nothing, Denmark would not have had any very serious problems later on. Instead they let the inflation run directly into deflation, where all values (real capital) began to be destroyed.

You have capitalized the possibilities of the future yield and trained the propertied classes to believe that war is a good business, the best investment at all. But you forgot to give them a lecture on the uncertainty of exchange rates, of the rate of interest and of the purchasing power to unspecialized (uneducated) individuals.

The real problem is not that people do not live twice here on the Earth. Their experience is just imperfect when it comes to reality, to real life, and this fact has been used time after time.

Some will try to learn from books and studies. But is not easy even if you are pretty clever. In four years 1935-1939 the concept state debt totally lost its meaning. In 1935 it meant everything, in 1939 it meant nothing. If you asked the logical question following this nonsense in the 1969 you got an answer from the professor saying between the lines that you had not understood anything at all. You certainly have to be strong as a 19 years old country boy.

A little from accurated financial history

A few quotations: Under “Must national debt be paid back”?

“…it is not a natural law that national debt ever should be paid back. The state must naturally pay back a loan, when the payments have to be paid, but if it is not convinient to decrease the debt, the payback can always be done by taking another loan… It is true by both raising a loan and by paying back that the only thing that matters is in what way it effects the economic life or the welfare of the society. There can not be given grounds for paying back national debt, if the effects that the paying back has is not wanted. If there is strong demand for labour under full employment at a moment in the society, the result can only be higher wage that necessary will lead to a rise in the prices, then it is perhaps convinient to collect more tax than necessary to cover the running expenditures, that means pay back the debt, because in that way the demand for resources will decrease. Before such condition has occured or better, before you wish to reduce the demand and the income of the society or a least stop its increasing, there obviously can not be given grounds for reducing the national debt…”

“When the state (on the other hand) is paying out money, it always receives the most of the amount from one or more citizens, and directly it creates an income in this way that correspond to the expenditure reduced by the part that goes abroad. If we for a moment assume that there is balance of the payments understood, as to every increase in import there is an export increase of the same amount, there is created with every expenditure an income of the magnitude in the society”.

“If the state in the same tempo, as it gives money away, collects taxes that are paid of means that the taxpayers otherwise would have given out for demand, or raises a loan that is yielded from money, that on the other hand would have been given out for labor and materials, there will obvious not neither be a smaller nor a larger total income in society, the only thing that happens is that the state now confiscates some resources that on the other hand would have been confiscated to private purposes, or would have benefited other persons than those who have the money now”.

“If the state on the other hand get the concerned money by taking it from its account in the national bank and the national bank does not tightening the credit elsewhere, or the state borrow on the market of bonds and the national bank by convinient buying of bonds prevents a fall in the courses, the expenditure of the state means (not alone) that there is created directly a whole new income of the same amount, but that those, who receive the money, again give some of it to people, who once again increases the expenditures. In this way an expenditure of the state creates for example within a year an increase in the income of the society in the same year, an income that perhaps is 23 times bigger than the paid out amount of money, and because the taxes in this country with the existing laws of taxation are about 25 p.c. of the income, will such an expenditure in the concerned or the next year perhaps give the state and municipalities an increasing tax income to an amount the half or three forth of the amount that can be the basic of the new expenditures or it can be used for lowering the taxes”.

Under “The balance sheet of the state”:

“If you actually want to operate with an idea of balanced sheet of the state as an expression of its economic situation, it must be the ability of the citizens to pay taxes compared with the expenditures that state is planning..” (unquote of the later Professor and Rockefeller Fellow Joergen Pedersen in: ‘Topical Economies Problems’, 1939)

Keynesianism, that Joergen Pedersen here is making marketing for, deals with problems of the society in a very unrealistic way. They are made to formulations of problems in a mathematical language of symbols or something just as limited, there has to be cleared up (as here) a logical, coherent chain of thoughts that neither fit the problem, as it really is, nor include all those things that practically effects the solution of the problem.

For example the influence on the economy of the funds, and the inflation have an inferior place in the works of Keynes and in the works of his epigones.

The same can be said about the national debt, as it appears. The new system (at that time) that should be built up in the after war period, should give exactly free admission to incur national debt. And it certainly did.

The targets for the society are always something like employment, activity and similar. The effect of the public sector on the economy is not interesting to a Keynesian, and you will at once be in doubt if the declared targets for the economy are anything but to ‘the exterior’ opinion, as Keynes himself called it, before he won the Nobel Prize (se below).

The whole entrance to the Keynesian way of thinking gives evidence of a fatal need of interest of reality, for example if the assumption all together and each of them draw a true picture of the reality at all, and then this cyberspace reality that they seek to give predictions to. It will be a special problem to the Keynesian to try to cover himself up behind assumptions all the time, so what he has said, is logic, when all assumptions have been remembered. If these logical relations, scholastic rides tell anything about the effects of different political economic actions from the authorities towards some correctly described phenomena in the society do not in principle interest the Keynesian. Here he has secured his retreat. It is a very central part of the Keynesian learning to train this. I have trained myself until I could not take more lies. My upbringing simply forbad me to continue the lies.

Therefore I must say: Do not listen to the Keynesian, he will coax you to do, what he believe in, and if you do not understand, what he is telling you, he will explain to you at last by referring to your lack of education (scholastic).

Precicely the same method that what used about 100 years before when you was explain why the gold standard what mattered

I have to inform you that the Danish Joergen Pedersen, who became a Rockefeller Fellow, perhaps could have won the Nobel Prize instead of John M. Keynes. Pedersen was not very known in the Swedish Academy, and many of his earlier writings were not written in English. The practical rediscovery:

From 1994 they are talking about paying back the national debt in Denmark. But nothing of the kind happens, the debt still rises every year until recently (2006). If the national debt was beginning to be paid back the unemployment would increase, the keynesians would tell you. The unemployment in Denmark is between 500,000 and 700,000 or 17-24 p.c. of the laborforce in 1999. I have tried to give an total presentation of the unemployment-accounts-problems on: http://www.lilliput-information.com/economics/led/index.html (in Danish).

Pupils who always work and always talk, tell you that the unemployment in Denmark is less than 150,000. That is the figure when you when you concentrate on the unemployed members of unemployment security system. The expelled ones do not exist. They did not in the Soviet Union and DDR either.

In 1933 the unemployment was 33 p.c. (the highest ever in Denmark) of the labor force (accounted in 1933). In September 1939 (when the World War II broke out) the unemployment increased 16,000, even if 20,000-30,000 were called to the military forces. In the years before unemployment had been reduced by public occupational work (‘New economics’, ‘Recovery’ or ‘New Deal’ made in USA), by exporting more to Germany, which were preparing for war, and by national debt, that means transforming more and more real capital to private capital.

At this time the unemployment were especially reduced by the Keynesian so-called ‘kickstarting’ operations. That the money was destroyed in this way did nearly nobody discover, because the war also made a new international monetary system that was based entirely on credit economy alone and and paper that is the same.

That the effect of this blind using of the theories of Keynes led to a public sector ruled by bureaucratic principles, a public sector that was a good deal larger than the things ruled by private, individual dispositions, and a colossal national debt ought to have been foreseen, but the theories did very convenient not tell this, the theories that were followed blind for 70 years. The dictatorship based on the nonsense writings by Karl Marx also lasted for 70 years. Nothing has been left to uncertainty if you look in right direction.

How should an unskilled individual know what to do? That is the reason why I got the right to vote.

A little accuracy about the between war period: 

John Galbraight still maintains the German economy recovered from 1933 by civil production, and he intend to let us believe that the German method was a kind of the so-called new economics. He seems to want us to forget a lot. In 1932 4.1 mill. Germans were unemployed. Two years later the number had been reduced to 2,4 mill. In 1998 (the election year) the unemployment in Germany with nearly the same population as in 1933 was officially 4,3 mill. The SPD-politicians just before the election to the Bundestag maintained that this number was not correct. The real or the true number was about 10 mill. (the same four years later at the next election 2002). In the late 1920s and the beginning of the 1930s the motorization came as a gift from the technical knowledge, the arming had been started, and productions and development of arms had long been going on in cooperation with the Soviet Union (unofficially). A restrictive control of the currency, tax discount tickets, and especially the suspension of the trade union wage rates was the axis of the German recovery policy from 1933.

From 1924 Hjalmar Horace Greeley Schacht was commissioner of the the Reichcurrency i Germany, later on President of Reichbank. April 7th 1924 his attack on inflation began with the decision to stop credit. This led to the Dawes Plan og August 16th 1924. The interest rate rose to the sky and the share prices were reduced to the half. With a short pause from spring 1930 to spring 1933 Schacht continued as the highest in charge in Reichbank under the Hitler regime until November 26th 1938. Schacht actually fought the deflation in Germany.

Some do still think that the way Hitler (or Schacht) went to get rid of the unemployment was to print notes. On the contrary as just mentioned. Schacht was not a Nazist, and he was highly respected in every central bank of the Western world. He opposed to Hitlers plans of war and chasing. Schacht ruled the emission of money issuing, decided the economic and monetary policy and controlled the effect. In 1938 Hitler accepted a proposal by Hermann Göring to introduce 4 years plans like the 5 years plans in the Soviet Union. At the same time Hitler intensified the chasing of judes. Then Schacht decided to go (January 1939). He was called back twice but left to join the forces fighting against Hitler.

Hjalmar Schacht got the claims of reparation, first decided in with the Dawes Plan of 1924 (after Worldwar I) reduced with the Owen D. Young Plan (1929). The original claims on Germany of the Versailles Treaty in Paris of 1919 would have brought Germany in famine with thousands of deads. All the industrial network found its way through the international lines but the ordinary germans without the knowledge of what was happening and possibility to use this knowledge went either bankructcy, lost their savings and got hungry. J. M. Keynes documentated this very properly in his excellent book The Economic Consequences Of the Peace (of December 12th1919) in which he took the Versailles Treaty apart. All qualified economists of the time agreeded with Keynes, e.g. Gustav Cassel and Bertil Ohlin and a lot of other. The year before (1918) Hjalmar Schacht wrote in his diary:

“Violence not even Money/Is shaping the World/Intellectual Power and Traditional Trade and Living/Prevail upon Worlds to Alter” (translated from German). Back to capitalization:

This process of capital formation towards private capital or out of the country is speeded up in a society where capital is a stronger and stronger condition to live in freedom and security.

“History do not repeat. Oh I see, people are becoming better and better all the time”. It is tempting to take dismantling for development, I must say. To the first sentence of the last paragraph, try : http://www.lilliput-information.com/economics/gol1/gol1.htm

But no sound production has been carried out caused by the Danish (1993-2000) public subsidy either. The money has been circulated, and the citizens still believe it was sound. But the prices are beginning generally to rise. At the same time the politicians have artificially lowered the interest rate in order to get activity to increase, and by this they stupidly hope to reduce unemployment. Instead they tempt the capital to leave the country. Let us take the subsidy (there are hundreds of issues as well):

Public subsidies draw the initiatives and the money to those areas that the politicians especially are concentrating the subsidies on. The activity then increases for some time, and the suppliers notice sales are indeed growing too. If the subsidies are increased all the time the Economy Of Command and the State Of Civil Servants grow, so does the distortion of the economic natural order. When subsidies stops or they are just not increased further all the time, the depression slowly becomes deeper and deeper, and the end result is even worser than before the subsidy. The raison for this is that politicians deal with problems that do not excist without the politicians almost all the time.

The thirties were also dominated by this subsidy-economy. New Deal it was called, in reality mostly inspired by J. M. Keynes from England. The economist who designed the Bretton Woods Aggreement. Jacques Delors, a French Socialist and the former President of the European Commission, said in 1995 that he was very fond of subsidies like those used in Denmark. Now he is a member of the Bilderberg Group.

Today company emptying is going on (much more explanation to this on: http://www.lilliput-information.com/economics/gol2/gol2.html#priv it continues while some of the authorities participate themselves in double parts. Just one tiny example more of what is going on, also in Denmark. The state issues bonds at a discount with a constant interest rate on to call in purchasing power that should have benefited the society as real capital, but that is not enough. On this route of death the fine leaders have also tried for a period of ten years now to collect foreign currency abroad in competition with all the other European debt and deficit countries by selling the bonds for foreign currency. They are tempted by the constant rate of interest and secured from collapse of exchange rates in countries they use to buy from. Loan debt in fairness is the most pressing burden.

They built on a lie, they continue on lies until they are dead. Then their fry of the devil takes over the visible power based on more fraud. “In the long run we are all dead”, wrote Keynes.

It is the same all over Europe – except for Switzerland, Ireland and Norway. The real capital has not yet been totally destroyed by war, mostly by secret abundance public consumption in the public and union foundations, much more than the highest taxation of the world managed to finance. Wage confiscation must be the right word, when the rate of taxation exceeds 50 p.c. of income – today all in all about 65 p.c. In Europe an abnormal amount of paper, and even under favourable possibilities of production it would have been a scandal to talk truthfully of prosperity at an acceptable rate employment. But Europe is even lacking of innovation, low technical level and false education at the same time they are constructing a new compulsory and political ruled currency of unit. As a result the direction of the capital formation is e.g. USA and unearned private capital. They try to protect themselves from the truth an responsibility, not as they use to say the Europeans from Globalization, in reality they believe in, what their friends the multi trillionaires abroad told them: “You shall become the real power brokers in a centralized and politically correct European Empire”

I would correct it to: Take your position in the line of Cesar, Filip II, Louis XIV, Napoleon, Stalin, Kaiser Wilhelm and Adolph Hitler.

To secure that we will not return to real life again they even transformed our children to animals. Steady and persistent for a period of 150 years: http://www.lilliput-information.com/economics/wu.html.

And that is also the reason why I look forward to (economic) Globalization without ideology, and the reason why I made some outlines of a new stable international monetary system: http://www.lilliput-information.com/economics/intmo.html

It is better for the all peoples to die a natural death than to be executed by the devil’s servants here on Earth. The natural death what so ever makes the few survivers stronger than before. The devil’s servants in contrast to this always execute the strongest.

To go further I would propose:
http://www.lilliput-information.com/economics/gol1/gol1.htm

and
http://www.lilliput-information.com/economics/tida.html

M. Sc. (Economics) Joern E. Vig, Denmark

February 8, 2011

What makes me less secure about PEW-information

Filed under: Demographics, Islam, Statistics — jensn @ 11:05 am

What makes me less secure about PEW-information

– although its all-included figures of the world and a very fine makeup of their presentations  
 
My first concern is that I know the premises of statical methods. Just a tiny few nations in the Western World register religious links and therefore they can’t count them either.
 
If I had asked: How many bugleries in Somalia i 2009? The answer would have been something like this: Forget it, they do not even have a central statistical unit in Somalia or Sudan. How does it come that religious links then are so fully secured in the results of PEW?
 
When I make an efford to get the PEW’s raw-data I certainly do not find any, but I find something summarised written about their methods: Questions to an extract of the whole muslim population or to an extract of whole immigrant-population or to the whole population in a country are central. It is very interesting to find out how they do their work about finding the statistical wholeness, choosing the representative extracts, using interviews or questionaires to secure the consciousness of the number muslims and muslims’ ability/propensity to lie when asked questions concerning their link to religion in an immigration-country and at home – and to check the method further.
 
Especially when you read their contribution concerning Denmark:
 
PEW-Projection:
“…2010-2015 about 4.000 muslims will arrive in Denmark according to PEW, while close to the end of projected period, 2025-2030, close to 3.000 will arrive, in the whole period of five years according to PEW…”
On Friday or next Monday I easily proves that more than 4.000 arrived in Denmark from countries dominated by islam … in 2010. And for all eventualities, all experience for 25 years shows they certainly are not Christians.

February 2, 2011

A historical report on ideas – dejavue to enlighten the new age – seen from Europe

Filed under: Dollar, Europe, History, Ideology contra Reality — jensn @ 9:41 am

The Middle Age

The Middle Age is the timespace in World History lasting for about 1000 years between the Ancient Age or Classical Antiquity depending on which contribution to the later periods and their descendants you give priority – and the Renaissance. Traditionally the year 476 AC, the year when the Western Roman Empire comes to an end, points out the beginning of the Middle Age, and includes the period of the great migrations with all its dismantling and transformation of the antique culture as the overture to the Middle Age. The ending of the Middle Age is on the threshold to the 16th Century: The discoveries, the Reformation, the time of Humanism (belief in the human being), where all relation in Europe underwent great changes. Some say 1492 (at least the second discovery of America, Leif the Lucky One (one of first Christian Vikings) and the son of the Viking Erik the Red One, reached New Foundland in the Ancient Age about 500 years before on his voyage from Greenland, and other say 1517, the year of the appearance of Martin Luther. The Middle Age is characterized by Feudalism, the orders of Chivalry, the temporal power of the church, monastic orders with the Scholasticism a.s.o. The fictional understanding of the Middle Age is the time of Mysticism, of the Romantic, of the great, strong uncomprehensive feelings. The romantic poets late in the next age borrowed examples for their motives of the Middle Age. Take Scholasticism. The ecclesiastical and theological philosophy from the 9th til 15th century. The teachers at those of Karl the Great’s monastic schools were called scholastics (from the Greek scholastikos, teacher), later on the word was use for teachers and learned generally. The characteristics of the Scholasticism are that it was extreme orthodox (in contrast to the so-called free thinking in the next age), and the result of the thinking and teaching was given apriori to be those of the church officially approved dogmas, the duty was to prove them with the help of the intellect. To be projected into the next age was especially the religious psychology, and their stringent logical reasoning. The last mentioned became the foundation of philosophical thinking later on. The breaking throught of free thinking from the late 1600s was very much inspired by Descartes, but Luther, Bruno and Bacon had fought against this free thinking as you will see below.

Renaissance

Means rebirth or redescent of the classical spirit, the rebirth of the interest of classical, Greek and Latin literature and art. That is a single and also a minor essential part of the Renaissance. When the interest of classical languages and cultures expanded to the wider circles outside the circles of the learned, it was more a consequence of the Renaissance, than it was its cause. You could perhaps say that Renaissance was the rediscovery of the human being itself and of the world. After school discipline lasting for centuries in the monastic schools, a natural maturation, and then a jump out into the light of history and life to conquere themselves and the world. The personal right and duty must claim oneself his individuality. The distinctive character has value, is not a sin. Artists, poets and scientists aim at originality. At the same time a ferucious interest of the nature, and of the objective world around the individual. Where the Middle Age saw sin and temptation, the Renaissance find new eternal values, objects and jobs and study, sources of pleasure and delight. Also new foreign countries and peoples are studied, a lot libraries, botanic and zoological gardens are founded. It is not a new paganism. It is solid founded on Christianity, its art selects only religious motives, its greatest men are believing Christians. The Pre-Renaissance (before 1500), the High-Renaissance (1500-1550), and the Late-Renaissance, the first with the starting point in Florence (or Firenze) concentrating on the awakening life to fight, and to find expression, and conquere the means of expression, intoxicated by spring, the next in full display, and then the harvest. In the humanism we have a single, common very doctrinaire and barren expression of the Renaissance, but the breaken through of the both the Reformation and the sciences has been prepared in this period. The evolution in the interior, exterior life, and the society as we would call it today, takes place as an interaction.

The universe and the relation between celestial bodies are investigated and compared with dogmas from the ruling Catholic Church. The typical assumption was that God must have created the world in complete accordance with perfective and simple mathematical formulas and geometric figures. So-called true causes – the physical causes, the causes shown in nature – replaced the former explanations that for example the movements of planets were to be explained by the souls of the planets. The mathematics and the experiment gave epoch-making results, but the Catholic Church was threatened. The so-called knowledge of the human being, and its power are the same. With the Renaissance the thought of the human being as a total independent being arises. Only by obeying nature you can conquere nature. The atmosphere of life was an overwhelming feeling of possessing unlimited and intiring possibilities, a deep feeling of being fully at home in the world, and to be the unrestricted master of everything, what the world may offer. You felt as if the world has just being created, and as if it suddenly had appeared from the darkness of the Middle Age, and now it was offered to the human being. At the same time the great rupture of unity of the Church happened. The personal relation with God. The human is being justified by faith, alone. The purpose of knowledge is to increase the control over nature because only in this way the nature can be utilized in the service of mankind (according to Francis Bacon). Here you already reach some clear contrast to the Scholasticism, and also to the Renaissance itself.

Rationalism (The Age of Enlightenment)

In the 17th and in the 18th century you find the great attempts to give a comprehensive explanation of the life by using the new concepts of scientifice. They wanted to replace such concepts of Aristotle (born 385 BC) with concepts from science. Movement was no longer something requirering a teleological explanation, and was no longer to be percepted as a possibility that by help of the formal cause was being made real. The new science required a new picture of the universe. The same mechanical basic laws for movements of the celestial bodies and the earthly bodies. All change is movement. Movement means a body changes its place in space, and such a movement has only one cause, the so-called caused cause. The statement of the law of inertia growing from Galilei, was experimented in the circle of Descartes and Huygens. And then the first law of Newtons dynamics. Newton operates with an absolute space, in relation to which every movement can be described. It is for this even movement, and even movements seen from this starting point which is expressed by a straight line relatively to the absolute space that Newtons mechanic laws have validity. The law of Inertia is a breach with the Ancient Thinking. A body can move even and along a straight line in a initial system without any exterior influence, that means without any influence of a power. Logic based on incontrovertible truths but on limiting assumptions. Assumption based on the senses can be doubted but “Cognito ergo sum. I think ergo I am”. The consciousness and the extent, both depending on God. Nothing comes from nothing. So it began.

The leading minds of Europe assumed from the definition of the human being that it was a rational being and attributing to the development of the intellect, and the exaggarating meaning of it. A rational human being has to live in rational state and in a rational world. That was what they were tending towards.

To get information, to look for all inherited views and examine and revise all of them in the light of a huge number of scientific discoveries was needed. It was necessary to do this in the interest of truth. But it was also claimed as long as a large part of life, and nearly all the people were mastered by the old agenda. For a great deal of the participants of the enlightenment, propaganda and agitation were also used to get consent to the attack on all antiquated – not at least the visible power brokers. The two aims are naturally often difficult to separate. And a lot of the published writers wrote very clear and understandable, and at the same time often so subtle teasing that the writings became common readings much more than anything else earlier. They wrote with warmth and enthusiasm, and knew how to spread their ideals. They caught the interest and incited the unaccustomed readers.

The most common ideas among the writers of rationalism was tolerance, freedom of expression and freedom of the press. Most of the published writers of Enlightenment forgot the debate about a theme originating from the thinkers of natural law, but Montesquieus wrote about how to limitate the power of state, and introduced the tripartition of the power in a so-called democracy. What troubled him was especially, what the Englishmen had achieved in 1679, the Law of Habeas Corpus – the suspect individual had to be shown in court before he could be charged.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau 

(1712-78) gave – among few in the 18th century – a very personal and passionated contribute to an understanding of the state, its so-called nature, its beginning and its objects. Rousseau even call enlightenment and culture in question. His thoughts have had a tremendous effect on the Western societies in the 19th and 20th century. Later on in his life he began to distinguise between false and true culture and between what is natural in the “natural state” and in the “state of community”. He claimed that a natural urge is in the human being – a dominating power – to be open, spontanious, good, sympathetic and thankful. That these instinctive and real feelings are more original than (and before) the reason, its the emotional life alone that makes the human being great and good, it is certainly not the brain. Rousseau’s writing are filled with contradictions and obscurities. But also his way of writing made a tremendous impression on the readers, even today. Rousseau got a least three children with different women outside marriage. The Scottish philosopher, minister and economist David Hume found three of Rousseau’s children in an public institution for orphans in Paris, France, and took them into his private care.

The end of philosophy and idealism – or the beginning of industrialism and ideology

The relatively short period 1750-1810 is one of the most fateful range of years in the ages of mankind. The previous ages had been charactericed by a considerably immutality in both the mental and the material life. Inventories, a new economic system and a reformed Christianity including a changed wealt-distribution are categories of exterior changes while the dominating (selected) philosophical contribution, and the general way of thinking among people will be charactericed as interior changes. I shall not postulate how causes and effects precisely are to be distributed, the sections about (selected) dominating philosophical thinking certainly support this omission. Already from the late 1600s and even more in the 1700s the cranks had golden times, government, influential figures and also the public were swamped by often pure phantastical proposals of new inventories in all areas of exterior life, but above all in the technical-economic. Industrialism changes nearly everything in the material world and “gave birth” to peoples.

Along with or contemporary with the war between England and France a Scotsman David Hume wrote “A treatise of Human Nature”. The Radical Empirism with all its consequences, written with literal elegance (might be the reason why it was published). It was “stillborn from the press”, Hume wrote in his selfbiography. In a way the contrary to Descartes. To observe, watch, to feel or percept something is to receive perceptions. Most of these perceptions are, what you will call of complex character. First premise: To say something exists, that something is existing, is to say that a certain perception, complex or not, are available or can be made avaiable. Second premise: The relationship of the language to the existing – the avaiable so (relevant or potential) – perceptions are deciding. The words of the language are understood as names of the different perception, Hume claimed. What is essential in this connection is that the language is secondary in relation to the perception. You may say that things and the facts of the world exist independent of the language. To maintain that the perceptions are present, ready to be given a name, is the same as to maintain that perceptions can be understood, identified and even be recognized as this or that quite certain independent of the language. And this is certainly not true as we shall see, but it is important, and an important discovery for the coming end of philosophy.

 

Idealism (and philosophy) at an end:

Hume’s radical empirism consist of three things, a theory of existence – everything existing might be presented as perceptions – , a theory on the relationship between language and reality – that the language comes after reality that already has been perceived, and has been understood – as a theory on the meaning of word. Words only have meaning if they are names of perception. This means that several word can given up – inclusive the word “I”. If the word “I” is an assumption of all consciousness it is an assumption of every language. Even therefore Hume’s radical empirism certainly has to be rejected.

A deciding difference between Emmanuel Kant and David Hume is their understanding of the relation between the language and that what the language is on. According to Hume the role of language was exhausted by being the names of the perceptions. But Hume failed. The use of concepts takes place in the language, alone. The smallest element of the language, according to Kant is the verdict, a statement where you state something (the predicate) on a thing (the subject). The concept and its use is the work of the intellect. The role of the intellect to understand reality by use of its concepts. It is imported to understand according to Kant that the concepts is the work of the intellect, and just by manipulating the reality to fit to the concepts of the reality, it is understood by the intellect that is different from the reality that is not decided by concepts – Das Ding an Sich.

Kant uses a distinction between empirical concepts and categories. Empirical concepts are concepts that make me understand the things I observe as being any certain kind of things. A cat can be understood as a mammal. By categories Kant understand concepts included in the assumptions of having and of using empirical concepts. The assumptions of language. Without getting further towards the categories of Kant it could be interesting to mention, one of them: the categories of substance. Hume rejected substance, because it was not possible to find perceptions connected to the substance. But understand, to Kant as well as to Hume the substance is not a part of reality, an existing extent. Kant has the language as an assumption. The logical structure of the language is alone deciding the existing facts. An example: Deciding to a scientific observation is that it is prepared and described in such a way that it can the reproduced by others, and an observation can not have value if it with the same observation made by others gives a different result within the accepted limits of accuracy of measurement. The scientific area of experience has to be independent of the observing individual. Whether the objective experiences are independent of the existence of common treats of perception and of consciousness is another matter. When it is understood that the object that is understood, by you understanding of it, is subject to the conditions of the understanding, the Kantician problem is inevitable. The recognition is viewed upon and investigated as if it was a tool which qualities – nature and limits – it is nescessary to investigate. If you have found out the qualities, you are perhaps tempted to make an experiment with the tool outside its qualifications and limits. Kant’s investigation of the pure reason was exactely such an investigation. The pure reason was the tool by the help of which we were able to recognize. The Kantician model involves that categories are used in time and space on given. The concept application or use has the implication that the categories (the tools) have to be used on something (the substance). Only when the categories have made their work recognition has any meaning, and it implies that the substance before the use of the categories is outside the recognition. But do not reject Kant’s philosophy because Hegel understand even the philosophical history as an dialectical process, and that is God’s consciousness before creation. Here you perhaps recognize the clear analogy Hegel’s understanding of philosophy of history and and the Jewish-Christian understanding of history.

“Die Phänomenologie des Geistes” by G. W. F. Hegel (1807). An explanation and an understanding of the result involves concepts themselves that are just understood by the help of concepts that have been used by the preparation of the philosophical system. An example: before the flower there is a bud. When the bud breaks the flower unfolds, and finally after the flower comes the fruit. According to the understanding of Hegel the bud, the flower and the fruit do not belong each to three different philosophical systems. The three formations cannot be separated, they constitute a whole. The problem for philosophy is therefore not the result of philosophical thinking. The truth is neither the result nor the process that leads to the result, but the result understood as the end result of a process that began with the bud. Hegel’s phenomenology includes philosophical considerations and philosophical arguments that are relevant for the understanding of the identity of subject and substance, and for the desciption of the dialectical process.When Hegel set out his views on the subject he means neither the empirical nor the individual subject but the universial. There is an identity between recognizing the universial subject and the object that are recognized. The dialectical process that leads to the recognition of the identity is a historical process where the universal subject actualizes the recognition. The Absolute of Fichte and Schelling (not further refered to here) was the basic on which all recognition build and the assumption of all recognitions. According to Hegel the absolute is on the other hand nothing different from the philosophical thinking or from the philosophical system. The Absolute is the actual philosophical system from its beginning to its ending.

How can an actual existing process of development (or dismantling) be understood only by the logic of the concepts? The cave parable by Platon gives much of the liberation by increasing metaphysical understanding. The dialectical process is similiar.

The founding idea of history is like everything else Hegel handled a concentration of ideas in which every imaginable phenomenon in life has its place and its explanation. Hegel understand life as development, the changes are the interior reality in everything. The principle of changes has a schedule in which life makes its own development. This schedule is Thesis, Anti-thesis, Synthesis.

To explane the use of this schedule let’s take the basic concepts of all life: to be, nothing. All existing must be, and the only sentence that in every sense is true about everything is to be. If you think of this concept to be, you find out that it is empty, without any content. This means according to Hegel that the concept is transformed to its complete contrast: nothing. The most extraordinary about the most positive word to be without content is the immidiate transformation to nothing. Is there a third word, in which the two word to be and nothing meet? When you at same time are and are not , what are you then? You are coming into existence. All existence is coming to existence. Every given state is Thesis that with interior logic nescessity turn into Anti-thesis, but these two contrary states then meet in Synthesis, that include both the two other states. The new synthesis is becoming the new thesis in a new threeparted development and so on. This Hegelian Principle is a deciding element of Hegels dialectical process. The history of mankind is understood by this schedule, Hegel claims. The single cultures have by logical nescessity developed from each other, and the historical cource could not have been another than the actual course. Every single epoke is as long as it exists, the reality, and beyong any critics a view suiting the ruling class in the State-Absolutistic Germany and especially the Prussian authorities in Berlin, where he gave his lectures in the 1820s. But there is a hope, everything most transforme into its contrast. The inventiveness of people and their effort do not lead the historical development, but the the interior logic of the historical course, by the name the dialectical process. In the Middle Age we had Thomas Aquinas who tried logically to prove the existence of God. Now God has got a new name serving the same purpose. This dialogical process has come to an end according to Hegel. W.G. F. Hegel, himself, appears to have been a very genuine man. Put very simple, the modified version of his thinking has been adopted by the controlling elite. The idea might perhaps be to create a war, and then win the peace in the way you restructure the devasted post-war world.

The Hegelian Principle.

The dark history of freemasonry

 

(an extract of Jüri Lina article (1999) with same title. Jüri Lina is an exile Estonian in Sweeden, member of the Swedish Society of Authors)  

 

Quotation:

“As early as 926 the free bricklayers grounded their lodge in York, England. In the free bricklayers lodge you taught the apprentices secrets of the geometric in the art of building. In the year 1375 was written in a document later found in the London archives that the free bricklayers were workmen who were subjugated by the feudal masters, but they were free go around in the country and in Europe. The mason’s guild had so-called free-letters with extensive privileges…..

In the beginning of the 1600s (Jakob IV of Scotland became Jakob I of England. He belonged to the family, the Stuarts. Their coat of arms was a bricklayers trowel and a sword that refers to ’Freemasonry and to the Templars Order) the mason’s guild began systematically to accept members who was not worksmen mainly caused by their extra economic contributions.

The modern political Freemasonry began in London 24. juni 1717 when a grand lodge was founded by joining four smaller lodges… To mislead the public they selected builder Anthony Sayer as Grand Master. Later on the workmen were shut out. The old mason’s guild came to an end. The corporative Freemasonry took their place. The next Grand Master was the lawyer Jean T. Desaguliers, who began in the year 1719. A new Grand Master was selected every year. In the years 1721-22 John, Duke of Montague, became Grand Master. At the same time he was a spokesman of the Hellfire Club, where he was busy with Satan worship, homosexuality and black magic rituals. In 1728 this Duke Montague was even Grand Master in the French-Scottish Freemason in Paris…(Unquote)

Another source

(among others fully specified sources David Icke’s ..and the truth shall set you free. David Icke is a former BBC-reporter, and Dr. John Coleman’s Conspirators’ Hierachy: The Story Of the The Committee of 300. John Coleman is a former MI6 employer, London)

Quotation:

“As illustrated there is fundamental difference between Freemasonry and what I will term ’Illuminised’ Freemasonry, those parts of the order which have been infiltrated by Illuminati agents. The word Illuminati – ’the Illuminated Ones’ – goes back into the ancient world. It is a covert force which has created or taken over groups and organisations to manipulate the world in the desired direction, but I believe it is a part of the globale Elite, a leading vehicle for manipulation, rather than very peak of the pyramid. finding out what happens at that level, above Illuminati, and identifying the people involved is a life’s work. The Illuminati’s greatest weapon is the advanced esoteric knowledge it has passed on through its initiation ceremonies and the misuse and abuse of that knowledge. The most obvious expression of Illuminati was the Bavarian Illuminati created by the German professor, Adam Weishaupt, in May, 1776, and supported financially by the House of Rothschild, the bankers to endless revolutuions and wars. It was Weishaupt who used his wing of the Illuminati to infiltrate and take over Freemasonry.

Weishaupt was trained as a Jesuit, which is short for the Society of Jesus. The founder of the Jesuits, the Spaniard, Ignatius Loyola, formed a secret society within this apparantly Catholic order and the initiates were called the ’Alumbrados’ which means the ’enlightened’, the ’illuminated’. Conflict followed between the jesuit ’illuminism’ and Weishaupt’s German version, battles which the traditions of Weishaupt mostly won. He created 13 degrees of intiation in his Illuminati and the key personnel were to be found in the top nine degrees. The Illuminati is a pyramid, too. The members were given special Illuminati names, inspired by the anscient Rome and Greece. Weihaupt was called Spartacus. These people became members of other secret societies like the Freemasons, and then ’illuminised’ them. – took them over and used them to destabilise nations and hasten the New World Order. They did the same within governments, banking, commerce, military, and the media, on behalf of the Elite.

So there is Freemasonry and Illuminised Freemasonry. The former manipulates at one level, but it too, is manipulated by another covert force, the Illuminati, which, in turn, answers to the global Elite. There are organisations within organisations (say, Freemasonry network within a government) and another organisation within those organisations (the Illuminati membership within the Freemason). This Illuminised form of Freemasonry became known as The Grand Orient Lodges or fraction. It followed the modified Hegelian tradition of infiltrating two extremes and playing one off against the other to create the desired change. Using these methods, it was pledge to overthrow the rule of the monachies, destroy faith in God, put an end to patriotism and nation states, abolish the ownership of property and dismantle traditional social order…”.

Beast die, Kinsman die,
One I know that never dies,
the Judge against the dead.  

 Some of the more silent coordinationed actions with an tremendous mental effects beginning in the 1800s

 American education in the first quarter of the 1900s becomes Danish and European pedagogy, marketing and the like in 1970s

In the following a short extract from a reading that is founded centrally on the well-documented facts of the ‘The Leipzig Connection’ by Lance J. Klass and Paolo Lionni, published by The Delphian Press 1978, Sheridan, Oregon, USA …..

The Leipzig Connection

But did this so-called “rational civilization” overstep the mark, you might ask?

The Danish Georg Brandes visited Berlin on his journey in 1870-1871, but with poor results for himself, and he had to be helped by influent people at the University of Copenhagen to come home and to enter upon a post at the university.

The so-called ‘Modern Breaking Through’ in the Danish intellectual life in 1870s started, when he returned. Oh, I remember the intellectual arrogance of this man (his readings). The head-master of the Gymnasium of Svendborg tortured us with this author nearly every day in the period 1967-1969. At last I thought (as a country boy) I was not apple to learn anything, perhaps I could not even understand anything essential of what was needed, especially in the disciplin literature.

Georg Brandes repaid the missing results (perhaps just his karma) to write to his family: “I hate Christianity to the marrow of my bones”. The head-master did not tell us this. Now I understand a little better, and I am apple to correct a little of, what I learnt in fear by heart by looking in ‘Explanation of Literature’ by Politiken.

 Charles R. Darwin’s

(1809-82) so-called pioneering work “On the Origin of Species by Means of natural Selection”, 1859, shall not be ignored though Darwin himself admitted late in his life that he had written it for spirit of time. Science or Myth? “Surviving of the fittest” and “The Master Race”. Could you reconsider debates over social and public policy issues from the 1870s through the 1910s with an openness and sensitivity they would wish for their own statements without Darwinism.

It is one thing to argue (as have Robert Young and others) that Darwinian science was ideological from the start, but another to demonstrate that the science was then pressed back into ideological service. The capitalism (no ism because it is not based on any ideology – but defined and named by Karl Marx) in the Gilded Age defenders of free market mechanisms, individualism, and laissez faire (so-called “conservatives” but in reality liberals by mid-19th century standards) rarely laced their prose with appeals to Darwinism, and virtually never in the way described in conventional accounts. What should the New Deal-defenders in the 1930s by characterizing the so-called laissez-faire policy have done without Dawinism, ditto the New Marxism in the 1970s, and ditto New-liberalism in the beginning of the 1980s.”Wilhelm Maximilian Wundt was born 1832 in a little town in southern Germany. At university in Tübingen, when he was 19 years old, transfered to Heildelberg after half a year and appointed to doctor of medicin at the university in the year 1856. He stayed in Heidelberg for the next 17 years. At first was employed as a professor assistent, later on he was appointed professor in psychology. At this time the word psychology meant the study (ologi) of the mind (psyke).

In 1874 Wundt left Heidelberg to take over the charge as professor of philosophy at University of Zürich. He stayed there for only a year, as he agreed to tak over the chair in philosophy in Germany at the University of Leipzig . He stayed in Leipzig for the rest of his academic carriere i Leipzig, eventually to be appointed to Principal of the university. Wundt died in 1920.

  The period of Wundt. How was this?

After the defeat of the Prussians (Germans) by Napoleon at the battle of Jena in 1806, it was decided that the reason why the battle was lost was that the Prussian soldiers were thinking for themselves on the battlefield instead of following orders. The Prussian philosopher Johann Gottlieb Fichte (1762-1814), described by many as a philosopher and a transcendental idealist, wrote “Addresses to the German Nation” between 1807 and 1808, which promoted the state as a necessary instrument of social and moral progress. He taught at the University of Berlin from 1810 to his death in 1814. His concept of the state and of the ultimate moral nature of society directly influenced both Von Schelling and Hegel, who took an similarly idealistic view.

Using the basic philosophy prescribing the “duties of the state”, combined with John Locke’s view (1690) that “children are a blank slate” and lessons from Rousseau on how to “write on the slate”, Prussia established a three-tiered educational system that was considered “scientific” in nature. Work began in 1807 and the system was in place by 1819. An important part of the Prussian system was that it defined for the child what was to be learned, what was to be thought about, how long to think about it and when a child was to think of something else. Basically, it was a system of thought control, and it established a penchant in the psyche of the German elite that would later manifest itself into what we now refer to as mind control.

The educational system was divided into three groups. The elite of Prussian society were seen as comprising. 5% of the society. Approximately 5.5% of the remaining children were sent to what was called realschulen, where they were partially taught to think. The remaining 94% went to volkschulen, where they were to learn “harmony, obdience, freedom from stressful thinking and how to follow orders.” An important part of this new system was to break the link between reading and the young child, because a child who reads too well becomes knowledgable and independent from the system of instruction and is capable of finding out anything. In order to have an efficient policy-making class and a subclass beneath it, you’ve got to remove the power of most people to make anything out of available information.

This was the plan. To keep most of the children in the general population from reading for the first six or seven years of their lives.

Now, the Prussian system of reading was originally a system whereby whole sentences (and thus whole integrated concepts) were memorized, rather than whole words. In this three-tier system, they figured out a way to achieve the desired results. In the lowest category of the system, the volkschuelen, the method was to divide whole ideas (which simultaneously integrate whole disciplines – math, science, language, art, etc.) into subjects which hardly existed prior to that time. The subjects were further divided into units requiring periods of time during the day. With appropriate variation, no one would really know what was happening in the world. It was inherently one of the most brilliant methods of knowledge suppression that had ever existed. They also replaced the alphabet system of teaching with the teaching of sounds. Hooked on phonics? Children could read without understanding what they were reading, or all the implications.

In 1814, the first American, Edward Everett, goes to Prussian to get a PhD. He eventually becomes governor of Massachusetts. During the next 30 years or so, a whole line of American dignitaries came to Germany to earn degrees (a German invention). Horace Mann, instrumental in the development of educational systems in America, was among them. Those who earned degrees in Germany came back to the United States and staffed all of the major universities. In 1850, Massachusetts and New York utilize the system, as well as promote the concept that “the state is the father of children.” Horace Mann’s sister, Elizabeth Peabody (Peabody Foundation) saw to it that after the Civil War, the Prussian system (taught in the Northern states) was integrated into the conquered South between 1865 and 1918. Most of the “compulsory schooling” laws designed to implement the system were passed by 1900. By 1900, all the PhD’s in the United States were trained in Prussia. This project also meant that one-room schoolhouses had to go, for it fostered independence. They were eventually wiped out.

One of the reasons that the self-appointed elite brought back the Prussian system to the United States was to ensure a non-thinking work force to staff the growing industrial revolution. In 1776, for example, about 85% of the citizens were reasonably educated and had independent livelihoods – they didn’t need to work for anyone. By 1840, the ratio was still about 70%. The attitude of “learn and then strike out on your own” had to be broken. The Prussian system was an ideal way to do it. One of the prime importers of the German “educational” system into the United States was William T. Harris, from Saint Louis. He brought the German system in and set the purpose of the schools to alienate children from parental influence and that of religion. He preached this openly, and began creating “school staffing” programs that were immediately picked up by the new “teacher colleges”, many of which were underwritten by the Rockefeller family, the Carnegies, the Whitney’s and the Peabody family. The University of Chicago was underwritten by the Rockefellers.

The bottom line is that we had a literate country in the United States before the importation of the German educational system, designed to “dumb down” the mass population. It was more literate that it is today. The textbooks of the time make so much allusion to history, philosophy, mathematics, science and politics that they are hard to follow today because of the way people are “taught to think.”

Now, part of this whole paradigm seems to originate from an idea presented in The New Atlantis, by Francis Bacon (1627). The work described a “world research university” that scans the planet for babies and talent. The state then becomes invincible because it owned the university. It becomes impossible to revolt against the State because the State knows everything. A reflection of this principle can be seen today with the suppression of radical and practical technologies in order to preserve State control of life and prevent evolution and independence. The New Atlantis was widely read by German mystics in the 19th century. By 1840 in Prussia, there were a lot of “world research universities”, in concept, all over the country. All of them drawing in talent and developing it for the purposes of State power and stability.

Experimental Psychology

The great Wilhelm Wundt asked and answered the question:

What is will?

“To Wundt, as it developed, ‘will’ was the direct result of the collection of experienced influences, not by a independent intention of an individual of causal relations”. “His intention was to prove that the human being is a sum of its experiences, of the influences that push his consciousness and unconsciousness..” “What decide the difference in time of reaction between individual and other things?” “Why do some individuals experience the influences different from others?”… To the experimental psychologist education is the process which gives meaningful experiences to the individual to secure correct reactions…”

“Wundt’s thesis laid the philosophical foundation for the principles that later on became deciding to the development of Pavlov’s animal-experiments and to American psychologists of behaviorism… in addition decisive to the development of schoolchildren, who were orientated more towards socialization than towards the development of the intellect of the child with the intention to continue the culture, but in favor of the development of a society that more and more submit to the satisfaction of sensual wishes on behalf of conscientiousness and endeavor for perfection.”

The young Americans who had learnt by Wundt, returned and established departments of psychology all over their own country. All of them were successful and they got respected on influential posts, especially at the American Universities. Each of them educated big crowds of students to the American doctor’s degree in psychology. New periods and other publications, new societies and clubs emerged, and every psychologist was pulled into another subject too at once, and here there was opened for the new urgent German psychology everywhere.

Some of he first American students at Wundt’s institute were G. Stanley Hall and John Dewey. The first were known for a lot things, as a great inspirator at the John Hopkins University that was founded on the German model, and he were known as the founder of the American Journal of Psychology.

After he had been taught by Hall for a year at the John Hopkins University, Dewey should start an exceptionally intensive and deep influence of the American sector of education. In 1886 Dewey published the first textbook of psychology with the same title. In 1895 he was invited to join the faculty at the Chicago University that was supported by Rockefeller. He became the leader of the department of philosophy, psychology and pedagogy.

In 1904 he published his master work: Upbringing: Its psychology and its relation to physiology, anthropology, sociology, sex, crime, religion and education. With Dewey’s words: “Upbringing consists of either to use ones own force in a social direction or in the ability to share the experiences of others, and in that way expand the individual consciousness to the consciousness of the race” (Dewey, John, “Lectures for the First Course in pedagogy”, unpublished, No. 1 (1896) pg. 1)…..

…..Of other most well-documented readings I must mention ‘Klokke (Bell) Roland’ in Danish by Johannes Joergensen, published by Pio’s Book-Shop, Copenhagen 1916. In this most special reading 93 German personalities of culture are exposed. They certainly did not tell the truth to the public about World War I in ‘Proclamation to the world of culture’, when they said they did so.Johannes Joergensen proves this mostly with himself as an primary source. On page 155 in ‘Klokke Roland’ you can read:

‘What do Beethoven and Goethe have to do with those, who burnt Louvain and bombarded Rheims. And also Kant – ‘Kant’s Vermächtniss’ you dare to allege – Kant’s Testament to the world. But an Eucken, a Wundt (mine: 2 of the 93 named) must know that Kant’s Testament, Kant’s Perspective was the united states of Europe and the eternal peace (mine:naive,but), Johannes Joergensen wrote in 1916. (unquote) Never mind Johannes Joergensen verified and told the truth about, what was happening in contrast to what the peoples all over the world were told about the World War I.

“Bell Roland is my name
“when I peal, it is fire
“when I ring, it is victory in Flanderland!”

To read more on:

Experimental-Psycology exported to USA –  US-dependence in full scale 1776

How EU and UN among others accomplish this project today:

 A New Human Being

 How many enemies fight in wars?

  Trading with the enemy

 The shortest version I have heard: “Figureheads are lying”

 Today…

 (don’t forget Rousseau and his belief in the human being, and later on the Modernism from the midd 1800 making plans for the ideologic state in the next century after having succeded with the so-called democracies as an experimentation playground with partly privatised partly government (and therefore false) influented central banks in advance)

 Freemasonry today represents the reality-advancement of the multiculturalism

General Wesley Clark, high ranking freemasoner and commander-in-chief for NATO-forces in Kosovo. He admitted to CNN in June 1999: ” In the modern Europe is no room for homogenious national states. They were an idea from the 1800s, and we shall carry it (the multiculturalism) through in the 2000s, and we shall create multietnical states”.

 The final step in dialogical process?

 Myths and superstition can be benevolently, Z. Brzezinski wrote in 1970. “Short of a benevolent world dictatorship bent on reform, we must work within the bounds of an ineffective, adolescent international system, with all the pains, crisis and irrationality, which adolescence dictates”, Z. B. wrote in the mid 1970s. The half secret Trilateral Commission, which shall gather the world in three blocks first, was established 1973 by the C.F.R-organization of 1919 with Professor Z. Brzezinski as its first director. Zbigniew Brzezinski (Z.B.) points out in his book from 1970, ‘Between Two Ages’ his and Robert Baily’s view on the changing of the European time-spirit:

“We shall from today live through a phase of time with the following aspects, 1st There is no progress, 2nd Social evolution is cyclical, 3rd Western civilization is in period of disintegration and decline, 4th Man is non-rational or irrational, 5th Society is composed of masses who, being non-rational and easily influenced, shall reduce mankind to mediocrity, 6th Scientific truth and knowledge may be harmful for society, 7th Myth and superstition can be beneficial, 8th A society is composed always of conflicting, 9th The society is ruled by the elite, 10th Democracy and humanitarian social values are unfortunately misundertakes that results in the rule of the uneducated masses. And he also adds that mankind has to live through the following phases in the long historical perspective, The phase with a religious clarification, the socialistic phase, then the era of the nations, and in the end The One-World-Society to crown the achievement”.

 Notes:1. Every thinker have to be accepted by the top to be known, so even Karl Marx’s, who was baptized Mordecai with the helper Albert Pike to manage his writings, and still including a bunch of mistakes for example that he forget the internatinal division of labour discovered about 100 years earlier; he build throughout his entire writings on Hegel’s dialectrical process, in the Marx-version dialectrical materialism; all in all suited to take the power assumed that the subjects were completely indoctrinated. Also Adolph Hitler’s thoughts had to be accepted by the top in order to be known.

 John Maynard Keynes’ thoughts were used from the 1930s in last phase of paving the way to turn the ordinary Liberal thinking into its Socialistic end:

Try:

The Truth Is (That) What You Believe In (?), that among other issues proves this.  

 When I select some of contributing figures in this file, they all, their ideas, and way of dividing up the last 1500 years have been chosen in advance by the top, except from a few figures in the end (we were not meant to know them, their influence and especially their connections. I have even reduced the number of reported ideas and contributers very much further to end up with a brief resumé that as far as I can judge is fair.

 I then had to give a supplement on freemasonry and Illuminati, and point at the Experimental-Psycology which have had an enormous influence which the reader perhaps can judge by realizing reality (not TV), and other documented sources. These issues have been closed country, but with amphetamines used on Danish school children, if they don’t fit into the systems, and school classes with one half of the pupils consulting a school-psycologist I have to tell the truth. And not at least the perspectives made by EU and UNESCO that you can read about on the link “A new human being” above.

Blog at WordPress.com.