This video gives me associations: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-QA2rkpBSY
Exponential growth: Population – Energy + this supplement:
All the production that is labor intensive and often also the most energy consuming is being outsourced now. What remains is the company cars, private cars and what is left of household energy consumption. In the West we will use much less energy in the future and finally nothing, as you will see below.
So energy consumption here has certainly not the consequence that we should lower the Western birth rates, as suggested in the video, because the West’s energy-consumption according to the video is much too high (it looks like a reprise of the arguments from the Club of Rome: ‘Limits to Growth’ in 1970s). The consequence is simply that Western populations are becoming extinct regardless of everything else and leave the area for immigrants and their descendants from areas with lower average IQ than here. But before that happens, do we will watch a dramatic decline year by year basically.
Demography is a terrible calculation, and it is logical, consistent and almost irreversible in reality it is used on together with the birth-giving women.
Exponential growth is one thing, the curve inverted, you could call exponential ‘shrinkage’. And such a public funded and privately consumed so-called welfare to accelerate the time of death closer and closer every minute. A welfare system is also just partially introduced in the U.S. that has just hit the debt ceiling. Oh, my God!
The war may continue in Europe – the old playground. I type ‘continue’ because it has been going on for years. It began again in the West in the financial systems, as with fault-immigration and the corresponding lies, and then in the stakeholder countries in the Middle East and North Africa.
But basically we are being destroyed by inflation and indebtedness made by mad and deeply naive, even over appraising politicians.
The current central issue is quite another than the West’s energy consumption:
With an official Western fertility in Western Europe at 1.38 – even some what lower, as I have shown – it will take at least 80 years (3-4 generations) to change the fertility back to the required 2.05 (not 2.1 or 2 , 11, 2.05 is probably because infant mortality has just been reduced to the bottom in the West). And in that period (80 years), we can not keep the area with the aging, which also occurs as a result of the protracted fertility decline … .. without very drastic measures.
The only adequate birthgiving peoples descend from areas with low average IQ compared to IQ here, and the same with their descendants born in the West. We definitely can not use them fully in productive activity due to of our even increasing need for IQ, because the wage-intensive productions have just outsourced to low-wage-areas. Where you find low wages and average high IQ, development combined with little developed, privately financed welfare, they will not emigrate when it goes well, and it would, as I mentioned, not do any good here if they did, the fertility is still too low.
Welfare systems and fault-immigration, which was set finally 40 years ago are accelerating the deroute even more, because immigrants on average is af load with a considerabely more than 3 times more of the welfare-yield for just 5-7 years more in the West, then the system goes kaput, at least here because pensions and housing benefits are not to be financed to retired people with anything that is a priority almost as high. It is that simple.
We have even counted at least two generations from now before there probably will be Western Europeans, with enough resistance to halt and reverse the influx of lower average IQ. Western Europeans (as we have experienced several times) will then prefer their greatgrandfather’s generation for the grandparents’ and the parents’, because in the first, after all, were a few that made an effort to correct madness up …. , Western Europeans will anyway be a minority in just two generations from now, given continued immigration, and even a considerable minority of the young / younger ages in 40 years. It is not the relative size that makes it, necessarily.
Whether the international monetary system can be designed in time, properly with real exchange rates and hence the zero-inflation as one alternative and dictates as a second, before we become totally disabled by immigration from areas with lower average IQ than here is an open question. They presumably chooce the precious metal coin basic, although it is purely a historical relic related specifically to the emerging industrialism’s frenetic growth: So there is something to speculators too.
Greater instability could easily come soon, for it is easier than the perpetual negotiation of conflicting interests with fewer an fewer opportunities for consensus and simultaneously increasing the creeping low inflation to keep the madness going combined with zero or negative real growth, while more and more anxious subjects will show themselves. With great instability perhaps we get some things put in place.
This can not be understood by but a small minority, some reject my English (you should try Danish), others because they think they live in an imaginary world, and still others because they do not understand logic. Now, 128 is not always preferable to 1-3.
J. E. Vig, Denmark, 26 July 2011