Dissidentpress

August 15, 2015

BEHEADING IN ISLAM – VIDEO BY AND WITH DR. BILL WARNER

Source: Dr. Bill Warner: http://www.politicalislam.com/beheading-in-islam/ (video)

When you hear of beheading, do you assume that Islam is involved? Beheading is an integral part of Islam. Mohammed repeatedly ordered people beheaded and the Koran even includes beheading. Beheading is threatened to settle arguments about Islam. Men were … Read More>>

…………….

Extract from : http://10news.dk/?p=1633

“…European cities today: houndreds of thousands of Muslims live in them, they are born and raised in our humanistic, democratic societies, but still they stick to their own culture and values. and still so many of them – probably a majority of the young – support the literal, violent, jihadi version of Islam: Generation Jihad is here! 80 percent of young Turks in Holland see “nothing wrong” in waging Jihad against non-Muslims. 27 percent of all young French and 14 percent of all young British under 25 sympathize with the genocidal terror organisation Islamic State. This includes most probably the vast majority of young Muslims in these two countries. These horrific numbers fit well with the fact that 75 percent of Muslims in Europe think that the Quran must be taken literally…”

“…Lots of horrific, must-know statistics here: Who is Generation Jihad and Surveys: Majority of Europeans is against spread of Islam…”

Advertisements

June 11, 2015

Jihadist Ideology and Strategy – not understood by the West

Published first time 2007

The Key to Jihadist Ideology and Strategy
By: Lawrence Auster
FrontPageMagazine.com | Monday, August 16, 2004

When trying to explain the Islamists’ global campaign of mass murder, both liberals and conservatives, despite their fierce mutual disagreements, make the same underlying mistake. People on the anti-war left believe that Al Qaeda attacked us because we’re imperialist, or because we’re racist, or because we don’t do enough for Third-World hunger (yes, there are people who actually believe the hunger argument; most of them are Episcopalians). By contrast, many people on the pro-war right, especially President Bush, believe that the Islamists hate us for our freedoms, opportunities, and overall success as a society. In other words, the left believes that the Islamists hate us for our sins, and the right believes that they hate us for our virtues. Both sides commit the same narcissistic fallacy of thinking that the Islamist holy war against the West revolves solely around ourselves, around the moral drama of our goodness or our wickedness, rather than having something to do with Islam itself.

A very different perspective on the Islamist challenge comes from Mary Habeck, a military historian at Yale University. Speaking at the Heritage Foundation on August 13, Habeck said that the various jihadist groups base their war against non-Moslems on the Islamic sacred writings, particularly the Sira, which, unlike the Koran, tells the Prophet’s life in chronological sequence. Using Muhammed as their model, the jihadis live and think and act within paradigms provided by the stages of Muhammed’s political and military career. According to Habeck, this internally driven logic of Islam, and not any particular provocation, real or imagined, by some outside power, is the key to understanding why the jihadis do what they do.

The first stage or paradigm is Muhammed’s early life in Mecca, a non-Islamic society where no Islamic way of life is possible, and where Moslems are powerless and oppressed. The second paradigm is the hejira, the escape from Mecca to Medina, a new place that is more pure and where a true Islamic society and state can be founded. After this Islamic state is formed, the third paradigm kicks in. This is jihad, organized violence against non-Moslems for the purpose of building up the wealth and power of the Islamic community and bringing the world under a single Islamic state. Jihadists conceive and rationalize their own activities in terms of these paradigms. Thus when Osama bin Laden left Saudi Arabia for Sudan, and when he later left Sudan for Afghanistan, he saw those journeys as corresponding with the hejira, leaving a corrupt land, where he was powerless, for a more pure Islamic place from which jihad could be waged.

In addition to the three stages in the growth of the Islamic community culminating in jihad, there are three basic approaches to waging jihad, called collectively the Method of Muhammed, that various Islamist groups respectively adopt toward the ultimate goal of establishing the world-wide rule of Islam. The jihadis’ choice of method depends on whom they see as their immediate enemy in that larger struggle; each jihadist group, moveover, is defined by which of these methods it adopts. The first method is to fight the Near Enemy prior to fighting the Far Enemy. The Near Enemy is anyone inside Islamic lands, whether it is an occupier or someone who has taken away territory that used to be Islamic. The second method is to fight the Greater Unbelief—the major enemy, which today is the United States—before the Lesser Unbelief. And the third method is to fight the Apostates first, and then the other Unbelievers. Apostates are false Moslems, people who call themselves Moslems but aren’t, a group that includes secularist Moslems such as Saddam Hussein as well as Shi’ites, who are considered heretics.

It is these notions, deeply embedded in the jidadis’ reading of the life of Muhammed, and not determined by what is happening in what we think of as the real world, that determine their major strategic directions and whom they choose to kill. For example, the terrorists who murdered 190 people in Madrid on March 11, 2004 did not target Spain because of its involvement with the U.S.-led Iraqi reconstruction; the group had been planning the Madrid attack for two years, going back to before the American invasion of Iraq. They attacked Spain because it was the Near Enemy—a formerly Islamic land that they hoped to win back for Islam. Similarly, regarding the all-important question whether the Wahhabist Osama bin Laden would have been willing to work with the secularist Apostate Saddam Hussein in an attack on America, Habeck says it is entirely possible, because bin Laden believes that his primary enemy is the Greater Unbelief, the United States, and therefore in the short term he would cooperate with an Apostate such as Hussein. Then, after America had been finished off with Hussein’s help, bin Laden with the enhanced power and prestige gained from that victory could redirect the jihad back at Hussein and other Moslem Apostates.

The key point is that, while specific actions by the West might provoke the jihadis to greater attacks, their fundamental strategic and military decisions are not determined by anything done by the United States or Europe or by other major enemies of Islam such as the Hindus, but rather by which Method of Muhammed each jihadi faction follows, and each of these strategies has its own internal rationality, though it is not a rationality that makes sense in non-Islamic terms.

The same is true for Wahhabism itself, says Habeck. Wahhabism began in the 18th century when there was no Western colonial power in the Islamic world; it was not set off by any Western intrusion into the Moslem lands. Similarly, the contemporary Islamist idea that America is the center of all that is evil in the world, making America the “Greater Unbelief”, was conceived by a Moslem scholar between 1948 and 1951 when he was residing in the United States. This was decades before the U.S. had any large-scale involvement with Israel, and decades before its culture spiraled downhill, though, from the point of view of that visiting Moslem, America was already quite decadent at that point and ripe for destruction.

What is most striking in the Method of Muhammed is the utter absence of any transcendent notion of morality. Unlike in traditional Western religion and philosophy, where God or the Good is the measure of human actions, in Islamism (which after all is simply a pure form of Islam) the measure of human actions is the shifting power tactics and military strategies of a desert brigand and war leader.

Lawrence Auster is the author of Erasing America: The Politics of the Borderless Nation. He offers his traditionalist conservative perspective at View from the Right

Recommend this site

What the West Needs to Know (wait 25 sec.):

May 24, 2015

Asylum Seekers, Beheaders and Mega Mosques

Asylum Seekers, Beheaders and Mega Mosques

One Month of Islam in Europe: April 2015

by Soeren Kern

May 24, 2015 at 5:00 am

  • Hackers claiming to belong to the Islamic State attacked TV5Monde, a French television network, and knocked it off the air globally. The network broadcasts in more than 200 countries. “Our websites and social media sites are no longer under our control.” — Yves Bigot, Director General, TV5Monde.

  • “We hate no one. We fight for our freedom and hence we object to totalitarian Islam, but we do not hate Muslims…. I am happy that we in the Netherlands and in Germany are allowed to demonstrate against each other. Without violence. Without hatred.” — Geert Wilders, Dresden, Germany, April 13, 2015.

  • “I’ve come here [to Syria] to behead infidels. I am ready. At some point, we’ll be in Switzerland.” — Jihadist who has had a Swiss passport since 1995, in a social media message.

1025

  • In Austria, a new report from the Federal Criminal Police (Bundeskriminalamt) revealed that 34,070 illegal immigrants arrived in Austria in 2014, a 24% jump over 2013. Most of the migrants came from Syria, Iraq, Somalia, Eritrea and Kosovo. More than half, roughly 20,750 of the migrants, hired smugglers to bring them to Austria; the remainder arrived on their own. More than two-thirds of the migrants arrived from Italy (51.6%) and Hungary (34.4%).

  • On April 7, Austrian Foreign Minister Sebastian Kurz called on the European Union to launch a military operation against the Islamic State. He also called for a crackdown on so-called foreign fighters in Europe. Kurz said: “We are a militarily neutral country, but in terms of the Islamic State, our position is clear: Humanitarian aid for the victims is necessary, but much more needs to be done.”

January 13, 2015

PARIS: THE CEREMONIES FOR PEACE CONTINUES AND THE REACTIONS

1 million on the streets of Paris with 50 Heads of State and Government in front. It is a new kind of modern solidarity, it is called. But solidarity with whom? First, the subjects in the streets a few days in a row. Next, the elite, the top and new crowds in the streets.

It was the effect of the heinous crime. There is jubilation in Islamist circles. One thing is the extended time span which the actions take place over this time with a distribution of attacks on several points, then police several days hunting, and especially law enforcement demo, then follows the popular self-adoration flæberiet and false feeling Ministry for exhibition in the streets, and finally which crowns the work met 50 heads of government up. They traveled to Paris and posed, mostly in dark clothing, but with clearly changing approach to it passed, to photography and TV footage. The celebration, solidarity, universal human rights, sadness, common feelings, at least the political privacy, intimacy, they were all together, together. If leaders lived up to attitude training among the subjects even with mutual grip of embrace so we do not know much. In any event, two of them in front was not motivated to embrace, for sure.
01_Paris[1]

July 7, 2005 attack on London’s innocent inhabitants had little in common with cartoonist attack in Paris. There was the 2005 attack with bombs on both a double and three commuter trains:

The first explosion happened in subway stations between Liverpool Street and Aldgate East.
The second explosion occurred on the underground between King’s Cross St. Pancras and Russell Square.
The third explosion occurred in the subway at Edgware Road.
The fourth came in a double-decker bus at the junction between Tavistock Square and Woburn Square.
52 civilians were killed and more than 700 were injured

Wider use of terror had already begun in 2005, so the effect could be seen more and more in the media. Another special effect that not many with Western habit of thinking realized in 2005: Exactly Edgware Road was in capita terms in 2005 incredibly concentrated with Middle Easterners and Africans – I stayed there randomly about an hour just a week before the bombing and also saw the golden giant saber in front of storefronts to the regular café with hookahs. Just to kill in areas with high concentration of like-minded or many of the same religion roused to battle and war engagement among potential recruits. This agrees with the Islamist thinking. To kill their own are less worrisome. universal rights here quite a different content. And the reactions to the terrorist attacks in Paris has only one effect on the terrorists’ behavior, they roused.

Forward this entry to your contacts

May 8, 2014

THE COST OF THE MASS-IMMIGRATION TO EUROPE

fahne Danemars
Politikerin-von-Somalier-ermordet

Sources:

Switzerland, short facts:

Was die islamische Immigration Europa kostet – Eine Abrechnung mit einem Mythos – Beispiel Schweiz og

Concerning Denmark Daniel Pipes and the Dane Lars Hedegaard have given some information: New York Post. It tells among other things about 4 per cent. ‘Danish Muslims’ consume 40 per cent of de Danish sociale consumption [and this certainly is not true, as muslims are not counted in any Westerb country, we can tell, and we inform the about 11-13 per cent of those living in Denmark in 2013, originate from a islamic dominated country or area.]. We correct this below.

Was die islamische Immigration Europa kostet – Eine Abrechnung mit einem Mythos – Beispiel Dänemark

schweiz

Switzerland:

„The welfare was made for the Swiss native, but it is used by foreigners. The Swiss social state has an immigrantproblem. Investigations show that 80 per cent of the social services go to foreigners, to asylumn seakers and people that recently have become Citizens of the country. [4] [1]

The share of employed immigrants was 53.4 per cent in 1990, but 17 years later (2007) is was 30.2 per cent. In plain text : 70 per cent of all foreigners, that immigrate to Switzerland turn directly to the welfare. [2]

Social benefits : 43.7 per cent to individuals of foreign origin. With a share of foreigners in the population of 20.5 per cent the risk of becoming a consumer social welfare is higher than that of the Swiss natives. [7]

„But the immigrants have neither language skills or the working skills with them, and they are not prepared for further education, to Men indvandrere har hverken sprogkundskaber eller arbejdsudddannelse med sig, og er at videreuddanne sig passende, let alone ‘to become integrated’. Unskilled labor without language skills are in the specialized labor in Switzerland hardly a chance.” [8]

„Thanks to our generous social systems often lack an incentive to continue with further education or to intensify job search in global labor markets. In Switzerland, we can not move relatives or spouses who (in many countries) to pay for the unemployed, but unemployment insurance and social assistance – and thus the contribution and taxpayers. The result: the proportion of foreigners of welfare recipients in Switzerland is above average and is growing steadily. Relating the foreigners who account for a proportion of the population of 20.4 percent, 43.8 percent of social assistance and more than forty percent of (Hartz) IV-services.“[9]

[1] Roger Köppel: „Zuwanderung in die Sozialsysteme“, Kommentar in: Die Weltwoche, Ausgabe 14/2007.

[2] Adrian Amstutz, Nationalrat: “Ausländische Sozialwerkplünderer gehören ausgeschafft” Die “Balkanisierung” der Sozialwerke, in: Radio Kempten, 9.8.2007.

[4] ebd.

[7] Schweizer Bundesamt für Statistik.

[8] Adrian Amstutz: „Die “Balkanisierung” der Sozialwerke“, Schweizerzeit Nr.22, 7.September 2007 (http://www.schweizerzeit.ch/2207/sozialwerk.htm)

[9] ebd.

Demographische Bombe: Zahl der Muslime Europas explodiert

“Were there all 600,000 Muslims in Europe in 1945, there are already over 50 millions. The Lisbon Treaty, Europe has committed itself to receive additional 50-100,000,000 Muslims in Europe. Within 2050. Mostly from North African countries. But increasingly the regions in the so-called black Africa or Central Africa and Equatorial Africa south of the Sahara. 90 per cent of all since the 90s of last century, who came to Europe as immigrants were Muslims”.

In southern France, there are now more mosques than churches. 30 percent of the French population to 20 years are Muslims. In Nice and Paris, whose share is already 45 percent . 2027 20 percent of the French population will be Muslims. Within 2050, France being an Islamic republic. In the Netherlands, in 2025 half of the Dutch population is Muslim. In England it was growing Muslim population in the last 30 years by 30 times from 82,000 to 2.5 million. Mediator has spoken to over 1000 mosques – many of which were previously churches. In Belgium 25 per cent of the total population was already Muslims in 2010. 50 per cent of all newborns in Belgium already Muslims …”

……………………………………………………………………………………….

Danmark, Tyskland, Sverige:

– Welfare consumption in Denmark: 30-35 per cent of the welfare expenses was used on non-Westernes in 2010. In 2010 that was 226-266 bill. kr. of a total of 752.

– In Germany was consumed in 2011: 28 per cent of alle social expenses on immigrants and their children: 2011 that amounted to 131.4 bill. EUR.

– In Sweden consumption of social welfare in 2012 showed a share of 57 per cent on immigrants and their children with I Sverige forbrugtes i 2012 andelen af samtlige socialbidrag 57% with an over-representation of 7.1 times. I 2007 290 bill. sv.kr. corresponding to 22.3 per cent of total tax revenue of 1300 bill. sv. kr. in 2007.

– In Norway Næringslivets Hovedorganisasion
has given af press release, as a bomb under the information of what the immigrantcost officially should be in Denmark. Danish official reports has estimated expenses to 15.7 bill. kr. per year. The Norwegians has now estimated the Norwegian expenses to about 60 milliarder n.kr. i 2011. But this has to be wrong, because Norway has much more immigrants than Denmark although more employed.

– France consumes ar least as many Euro on the project as Germany does.

and we have just concentrated on the econonmic all destroying.

Bruxelles, Antwerpen og Amsterdam has been taken. Belgien og Holland are taken 2030.

—————————————————————-

The ideologies Liberalism and Internationalism reached concensus:

The liberales would have the tax-based welfare system abolished even though they have aggreed introduce it. Internationales would have a new dictatorship to aime for, after the Sovjet Union collapes. If it should be clergy dictatorship with a new legal religion did not play a role. None of the influential players understood that every ideology is as any other ideology. …or did they?

J. E. Vig, 2. februar 2014

April 17, 2014

The EU wants to legalise pedophilia

This issue is much more important than it seems at first sight, and similar tendencies in other countries suggest that they all have a common origin : The EU. Unfortunately the mindset behind all this is so unlikely that ordinary peope refuse to believe it. Which gives the instigators a tactical advantage. But let us consider another area first: biology.

Most female animals become enraged if their young are attacked. They try to save them unless the situation is hopeless. The culture conflict ensuing from immigration from under-developed countries that we are now caught up in is not a war with weapons but a war against the individual. He or she continually and increasingly risks being attacked randomly in the street and kicked beaten sometimes even to death. Women are attacked and raped.
Believe it or not, a similar attack is being planned at the apex of society. The target is again the individual but this time the violence is not physical but psychological. The procedure is simple: Ways – often very simple ways – are found to take the child from its parents. The immediate excuse could be – as is often the case in Sweden – that because the parents sometimes prefer to give their children elementary education themselves. And this is forbidden. The children who have been removed from their parents are put in the care of foster parents or sent to an institution, where they are purportedly better off. But in some cases the authorities have been obliged to pay the separated children damages for their lost childhood once they have reached adulthood.

All-powerful authorities can also remove children in more discreet ways. Children can be tricked into accepting splitting their families via forced schooling without understanding what is at stake.

This underhand method started with the Lisbon Treaty in 2008. Its text permitted new legislation legalising pedophilia, the sexual abuse of childfren

The background for this move was the immigration tidal wave of “unintegrateable” muslims from Africa, who all insist on holding on to their “culture”. A part of this culture is permissible pedophilia both inside the family and in the tradition of child brides. For non- muslims this idea is repugnant, but having for some years advocated sex in all its forms the next step after acceptance of homosexuality is logically pedophilia, and a Swedish sex- society, RFSL, (campaigning under the guise of equal rights!) has been accepted by the UN in 2007 as a consultative body for several countries.

The EU has now in conjunction with WHO (World Health Organisation) proposed obligatory sex-education for kindergarten childrem (WHO recommends this from birth!) in all forms of sex including pedophilia. This should come into effect in from the year 2015. Many parents have protested that the right to bring up their children has been taken from them by offical authorities and that the natural order of things has been reversed. WHO contends that sex-education in all its forms is absolutely necessary for the children’s health and well-being. Parents og course are not pleased at the idea of lubricious political sex-education, but they don’t have a leg to stand on
Many parents will disagree with my objections to all this, because they cannot imagine that things will go as badly as I predict.. But they will. I have seen all this before, in the seventies, when school teachers used pornographic teaching material and even pornographic magazines. A parent’s revolt agains the EUs planned sex-education is already underway in southern Germany where there have been demonstrations against it, and in Switzerland parents are working for a referendum on the subject

The Swedish “Scandinavian Committee for Human Rights” targets parents and purports to protect children’s human rights. Its members try to prevent unnecessary amd distressing removal of children from their parents. These often take place on thr basis of dubious contentions and under the cloak of a professional vow of silence”.

Sweden is notorious for this sort of thing as it often turns out that the fosterparents and the institutions to which the children are assigned are not properly checked for bad behaviour including pedophilia. The Swedish state plays down these dreadful incidents by paying compensation to the children for the loss of their childhood.

I It now turns out that on March 19th the “Scandinavian Committe for Human Rights”has took part in a big conference in the European Parliament’s Petitions Committee (PETI) re. forced removal of children and forced adoption of Children in Great Britain.

The number of children involved was apparently about 1000 a month without anybody intervening.

It has also come to light that NKMR sent a report on conditions in Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland on december 23rd to PETI but that they have not yet received an answer.

One picture and text from the conference said everything, because it gave people the maximum shock – also known as the truth. Supreme Court judges were actually involved in a child-sex network: The British queen’s advisor and founder of a pedophile ring opposing the incareration of criminals. Lord Justice Adrian Fulford was last year appointed advisor to the British queen. He was also an important menber of the notorious pedophile group for exchange of information (PIE). The police suspects the group are abusing children “at an industrial level”. Fulton has been revealed as one of the principal campaigners defending PIE, who demand that the age of consent for for sex with children (pedophilia) should be set at six years of age.

This is a sick society. Muslims want to import their “culture” to Europe and are hindered by laws outlawing pedophilia. So the EU gives in as it always does. This trend is so difficult to understand that many will think it’s all a misunderstanding. They want to believe that the family is still protected by recognised parental authority. But this is no longer the case. A powerful dictatorship of the elite can do whayever it wants.

Gertrud Galster

April 6, 2014

VOICE FOR THE VOICELESS – BILL WARNER – VIDEO 1&2


May 31, 2013

MUSLIMS MUST REJECT JIHAD

Tommy Robinson, leader of English Defence League (EDL) speaks out about the public beheading in UK

Tommy Robinson, co-founder of the English Defence League, sounds off on the horrific public murder and mutilation of English soldier Drummer Lee Rigby in the Woolwich area of London. As Robinson explains, the savage attack indicates that the dark future awaiting the United Kingdom is closer than most realize.

He used to be a plumber until Muslims spat on his soldier-friends returning from Afghanistan.That made him angry and he decided to risk everything to stop Islam. He is regularly harrased by both the police and Muslims. Take a few minutes to listen to world famous, straight talking Tommy Robinson:

Se videoen med Tommy Robinson: http://frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/tommy-robinson-on-woolwich-islamist-terrorist-attack/ (have 1/2 min. patience)

What the West needs to know (have 1/2 min. patience – and send further out anyway)

February 24, 2013

Oxford, Britain: Young Woman Branded And Raped By Several Men From Age 12

Filed under: crimes, Education, Islam, migration — Tags: , , — jensn @ 1:39 pm

A court sketch of the defendants in the Oxford child abuse trial

A court artist’s sketch of defendants (left to right) Kamar Jamil, Akhtar Dogar, Anjum Dogar, Assad Hussain, Mohammed Karrar, Bassam Karrar, Mohammed Hussain, Zeeshan Ahmed and Bilal Ahmed. Photograph: Elizabeth Cook/PA

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/feb/22/oxford-child-abuse-trial-branded/print

“A young woman has told the Old Bailey that when she was 12 years old she was branded with the initial of a man so other men who raped her would know she “belonged” to him.

The jury was earlier told that the woman, now 19, had been sold to the man as an 11-year-old. She told the court that until she was 15 he repeatedly and brutally raped her, organising for other men to have sex with her.

The woman, known as girl D for legal reasons, said on several occasions Mohammed Karrar and his brother Bassam Karrar forced her to have sex with one of them while performing a sex act on the other.

The woman is the fourth witness to give evidence at the Old Bailey in the trial of nine men accused of offences including rape, trafficking and child prostitution against children as young as 11 in Oxford.

Appearing in court via video link, the woman struggled to control her emotions on several occasions, fighting back tears and taking deep breaths as she gave her evidence…”

November 27, 2012

PAT CORDELL: HAMAS IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE GAZA-WARS

A REAL EYE OPENER

Palestinian Kids

THE WORLD IS SO CONCERNED ABOUT PALESTINIAN KIDS

(These are the images they show :)

(These are the images they DON’T show:)

Please help to show these pictures to the world.

September 14, 2012

U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens, tortured and murdered by jihadist savages


Jihad savagery in action

Source: http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/09/in-any-war-between-the-civilized-man-and-the-savage-support-the-civilized-man.html

“U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens, tortured and murdered by jihadist savages. (Photo via KSFO.)

Remember Pamela Geller’s ad? “In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel. Defeat jihad.” The MTA and the Leftist media was in a tizzy over the word “savage.” You can’t call jihadists who murder Israeli civilians and celebrate the murders by passing out candies “savages.” That’s demeaning! It’s…racist!…”

Warships on their way

September 7, 2012

Paul Weston speaks at the International Free Press Society, Canada, 19 February 2012

Even though Paul Weston is sending his message with The British Freedom Party 25 years too late so let him be listened to:

Great Britain’s corrected population account

Korrektur der deutschen Bevölkerungs-Gleichgewicht

September 15, 2011

MUSLIMS PRAY IN THE STREETS OF PARIS – VENICE?

Filed under: Demographics, Islam, Jihad, perspectives, Research — Tags: , — jensn @ 7:24 pm

FRANCE: ISLAM; PRAYING IN PARIS STREETS BANNED FROM TONIGHT

Read more: http://tundratabloids.com/2011/09/french-interior-minister-says-no-more-praying-in-the-streets.html

Rumor: Because there are no mosques in Venice the government allowed the muslims in Italy to pray in the steets:

July 18, 2011

THE REGIME OF STUPIDITY IS WORSE THAN THE REGIME OF EVIL

LET’S GET UNDER NORWEGIAN RULE

European tax-funded recruitment offices for labour in the capital Praia in Cape Verde (islands) in West Africa in 2009, and in Mali, West Africa also opened a similar office in October 2008. There is no real growth in Western Europe. But the Lisbon Treaty the EU has committed to purchase 50 million more non-western immigrants in addition to at least 50 million already funneled into. There are also tax-financed job-enlistning-offices at several locations in Eastern Europe to invite Eastern Europeans to Western Europe.

Source: http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/78180/50million-invited-to-Europe

In Denmark non-Westerners consumed 30-35% of the total welfare in 2010, meant to replace the earned income and pensions, when you left work or missed work / you were excluded from labourforce after unemployment. The percentage has been calculated taking into account all tax payments along with irrefutable facts provided by the public, government’s Welfare Commission.

Sources: Welfare Commission 2005     Information about Denmark 2010

In Sweden  ‘foreign born’ consumed 60-75% of social expenditures in 2010. Taxes were not included in the calculations, but otherwise the rates are very much in line with shares in Denmark. If anyone with a foreign background were included it would have been considerably higher percentages. Two generations of ‘born in’ Sweden, but called Swedish, though they certainly have a foreign background.

Sources: Affes Blog    Central Statistical Bureau

In Norway, the immigrants consumed 60 billion nkr. of the welfare schemes at a little more future unemployment the Norwegian version of the Danish Employers’ Confederation claims. The same source claims there are nearly 300,000 immigrants in Norway. In Denmark, the officially number 1 January 2010 was 540,000 and 561,000 the first January 2011. In Denmark foreigners officially cost 20 billion ddk. yearly. Unemployment and exclusion from the labour market are much smaller in Norway compared to Denmark. So fewer immigrants with lower unemployment costs after the reported almost three times more per year in Norway. Source: Brochmann-utvalget

I wonder what’s going on? No, we know what is going on.

In Denmark, immigration actually costs more than 10 times more than the officially announced, namely 30-35% of all welfare expenditure in 2010 that was 752 billion ddk totally,  i.e. 225-263 billion ddk. What is it in just those circumstances that makes Denmark more solid than Greece, which first and foremost is ‘for sale’ on bonds somewhere (?), maybe along with Italy?

On 30 June 2011, we read Ralf Pittelkov report on the cause of Greek tragedy. First EU ‘responsibility back to Greece’s accession in 1981, then to Greece’s own risk. For this last particular: “… The responsibility lies, of course, especially in Greece itself. The economy is marked by a sweltering high and ultra inefficient public sector, widespread corruption, a grotesquely flawed tax system and a lousy productivity … ”

It is so typical Danish, not one bit better than the so-called senior economists in banks, each day give their views on the economy, including the euro and European integration. Only one way, and it goes just keep coming, and when the road then turns out to be a blind, and they even have overlooked the sign that signaled just that, then the opposite way, so it goes just keep coming. Indeed we must be in breath, the worst of us, but all along we kept nice and quiet, for all the world. Politicians would lose face.

If the thought has occurred to them that conditions what repair readiness concerns that Denmark has the world’s largest consumption relatively to production, in no way better, rather worse a few years to come. The agencies’ inefficiency is given the same, corruption takes many forms – it can show itself as unhealthy, excessive nepotism and lack of competition (in a small, easily manageable country) in the clearest – and the taxes and thus wages are the highest in the world. This is achieved no matter the remaining business productivity. Resources are a little lime, a little clay, a little salt, a little gas, a little oil … and for a short time even a little IQ.

Denmark 2-4 years more before it looks like Greece

We wrote something about the pyramids – maybe inverted pyramids:  http://danmark.wordpress.com/2011/07/14/hojt-pa-en-gren-en-krage-knald-eller-fald-fredag-eller-snarere-i-naeste-uge/

Ebbe Vig, Information about Denmark: They are trying to put Europe deserted for the parent Europeans, Arabs have to pay European States’ debt, and fill the area with immigrants from the Middle East and Africa. It all happens with agreements with hosts of other than of European populations. It can not be said to be wise. When it is not wise, then you can very easily get to the assessment that it is stupid. Evil is easier to adjust to, because you often can adapt to it. Stupidity is unpredictable concerning both decisions and actions.

This is confirmed by a German who uses Denmark as an example in a major review of the planned Eurabia. Already in 1980s, we were informed that Denmark is used as a pilot country. It was reported by a chat participant from one of the blessed savior of agencies on a strategy course: http://michael-mannheimer.info/about/comment-page-1/ # comment-1359

Older Posts »

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.