Dissidentpress

July 26, 2011

Very Popular Video On Exponential Calculation In An Easy Way – But Something Does Not Add Up When It Comes To What Is Illustrated

This video gives me associations: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-QA2rkpBSY

 

Exponential growth: Population – Energy + this supplement:

 

All the production that is labor intensive and often also the most energy consuming is being outsourced now. What remains is the company cars, private cars and what is left of household energy consumption. In the West we will use much less energy in the future and finally nothing, as you will see below.

So energy consumption here has certainly not the consequence that we should lower the Western birth rates, as suggested in the video, because the West’s energy-consumption according to the video is much too high (it looks like a reprise of the arguments from the Club of Rome: ‘Limits to Growth’ in 1970s). The consequence is simply that Western populations are becoming extinct regardless of everything else and leave the area for immigrants and their descendants from areas with lower average IQ than here. But before that happens, do we will watch a dramatic decline year by year basically.

Demography is a terrible calculation, and it is logical, consistent and almost irreversible in reality it is used on together with the birth-giving women.

Exponential growth is one thing, the curve inverted, you could call exponential ‘shrinkage’. And such a public funded and privately consumed so-called welfare to accelerate the time of death closer and closer every minute. A welfare system is also just partially introduced in the U.S. that has just hit the debt ceiling. Oh, my God!

The war may continue in Europe – the old playground. I type ‘continue’ because it has been going on for years. It began again in the West in the financial systems, as with fault-immigration and the corresponding lies, and then in the stakeholder countries in the Middle East and North Africa.

But basically we are being destroyed by inflation and indebtedness made by mad and deeply naive, even over appraising politicians.

The current central issue is quite another than the West’s energy consumption:

With an official Western fertility in Western Europe at 1.38 – even some what lower, as I have shown – it will take at least 80 years (3-4 generations) to change the fertility back to the required 2.05 (not 2.1 or 2 , 11, 2.05 is probably because infant mortality has just been reduced to the bottom in the West). And in that period (80 years), we can not keep the area with the aging, which also occurs as a result of the protracted fertility decline … .. without very drastic measures.

The only adequate birthgiving peoples descend from areas with low average IQ compared to IQ here, and the same with their descendants born in the West. We definitely can not use them fully in productive activity due to of our even increasing need for IQ, because the wage-intensive productions have just outsourced to low-wage-areas. Where you find low wages and average high IQ, development combined with little developed, privately financed welfare, they will not emigrate when it goes well, and it would, as I mentioned, not do any good here if they did, the fertility is still too low.

Welfare systems and fault-immigration, which was set finally 40 years ago are accelerating the deroute even more, because immigrants on average is af load with a considerabely more than 3 times more of the welfare-yield for just 5-7 years more in the West, then the system goes kaput, at least here because pensions and housing benefits are not to be financed to retired people with anything that is a priority almost as high. It is that simple.

We have even counted at least two generations from now before there probably will be Western Europeans, with enough resistance to halt and reverse the influx of lower average IQ. Western Europeans (as we have experienced several times)  will then prefer their greatgrandfather’s generation for the grandparents’ and the parents’, because in the first, after all, were a few that made an effort to correct madness up …. , Western Europeans will anyway be a minority in just two generations from now, given continued immigration, and even a considerable minority of the young / younger ages  in 40 years. It is not the relative size that makes it, necessarily.

Whether the international monetary system can be designed in time, properly with real exchange rates and hence the zero-inflation as one alternative and dictates as a second, before we become totally disabled by immigration from areas with lower average IQ than here is an open question. They presumably chooce the precious metal coin basic, although it is purely a historical relic related specifically to the emerging industrialism’s frenetic growth: So there is something to speculators too.

Greater instability could easily come soon, for it is easier than the perpetual negotiation of conflicting interests with fewer an fewer opportunities for consensus and simultaneously increasing the creeping low inflation to keep the madness going combined with zero or negative real growth, while more and more anxious subjects will show themselves. With great instability perhaps we get some things put in place.

This can not be understood by but a small minority, some reject my English (you should try Danish), others because they think they live in an imaginary world, and still others because they do not understand logic. Now, 128 is not always preferable to 1-3.

J. E. Vig, Denmark, 26 July 2011

April 6, 2010

Welfare Experience Concerning Non-Western Immigrants In Denmark

Things to have in mind as an American

Two generations of so-called welfare financed by taxes and consumed almost entirely privately resulted in a very interesting information from the official Welfare-Commission with so-called welfare-experts taught to tell what the politician don’t dare to say themselves and to defend any doings (within their expertice) of  any government  – a so-called buffer:

Non-Western immigrants in Denmark consume 3.47 times the amount of welfare in average compared with the average of the Danes (self-knowledge usually is a good thing even though we knew and also told it right from the beginning):

So, if we allow a little mathematics:
x/(1-x) * Danes’ share in p.c. of the population/Non-Westeners’ share in p.c. of the population =3.47

where x is the percentage of Non-Westerners’ consumption of the entire welfare-budget.
(we can ignore the Western immigrants, they are very few, and they mostly come here to work)

Result: x= 30%, even though we calculate with just 11% Non-Westernes – perhaps 15% is even more realistic (check the table). We are not allowed to know the correct number og Non-Westeners, but we must pay anyway, so we get the politically correct number instead partly to make us pay.

This means that the Danish welfare-system that was bound to collapse when the hippy-generation of rulers had become pensioners and was expected to have eaten up all national resources precisely by the time of their death will collapse in 2-4 years from now instead.

Our prognoses for the last 23 years got very close to the truth – and we can even proved it!

February 24, 2010

UNITED WE STAND

EDL: Land of hope & glory – Notts December 5th 2009

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XUub1no1qw

The Third Jihad: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5H0Olh_C3sE&feature=PlayList&p=71336BEDAEFD3499&index=0&playnext=1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZHnfFLZ9XU

February 9, 2010

Day Of Denmark – Day Of The Western World

The time is characterized by form without contents

In addition

Praeterea censeo….

NO CLIMATE CHANGE CAUSED BY MAN
Link: The Great Global Warming Swindlehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52Mx0_8YEtg
Shown as clear as the day in 2007 (click at the arrow above)

February 2, 2010

SHALL YOU EVER GET ENOUGH – YES, I THINK SO, BUT TOO LATE

Shall you ever get enough – I think so

30 percent of social workers and so-called case workers have been threatened or attacked, then we obviously have some more uttered to advise and handler futile.

Crimes against these and other vulnerable groups should not be recorded properly

When police officers in gang cities – the five largest – and a couple of threatened in their homes, their cars and outbuildings burned, and their whereabouts limited so we obviously have some more to the band.

When 40 percent of welfare benefits went to non-western immigrants in the late 2005, so of course we must make sure that not less than 50 percent of the welfare is transferred to the group in 2010.

When the violence and the number of homicides and attempted homicides rise sharply, then the number of these offenses, of course, must grow explosively instead. Home Robberies rose in such numbers, 2006-2009: 16-23-56-more than 100, and so they must increase even wilder year by year, of course, increased further and further.

5 times more murders and attempted murders in a 20-years period from 1985 to 2005, although the ethnic Danish population during the same period went back with nearly 300,000. During the same period the number of alien immigrants, however, increased by a factor of 10. 1967-2005, e.g. in 38 years the number of murders and attempted murders have increased by 644% or 6.4 times. From 1967-2008: increased 7.53 times.

Juvenile crime:

The person dangerous crime, as 10-14 year olds registered suspected for: There is an increase of 261 percent over a 7-year period 2000 — 2007, more than double but less than a tripling. The person dangerous crime, as 15-17 year olds registered suspected for: There is increase of 179 percent over 6 years of 2000-2006,
So almost a doubling.

If the idea of one or more reasons were to fall, for example. Somalis in Denmark, then you obviously know that 10,087 Somalis have been granted Danish citizenship in the period 1979-2008, including 1593 in period 2001-2008. They are obviously fewer and fewer when there comes more by immigration and births, than in this exchange and appropriate payment (per kr.1000. nose) turned into ‘Danes’. And you should also know that these numbers obviously have to get up the next 7 years, it is about growth.

When there was someone who could predict what others was not able to discover the first 20 years despite adequate information thereon in all years, and again others who never saw it, was not even susceptible to information, then it is the latter who at most have a full understanding and track and therefore can and should decide most.

They control the country:

DR 9th February 2009: “In all, 7 Danes have been convicted of terrorism and none of those convicted or accused is added from outside. Some are born in Denmark – others have grown up in this country and has acquired Danish nationality … ”

DR: theory: “The rest are neither born nor immigrated” Unfortunately, our logical conclusion.

‘Danish terror against asylum children – reverse torture – is widespread in practice’.

The Danes have only a theoretical relationship or no relationship to other terrorism, and it characterizes their position on the course terrorism.

One of the most well-informed by its ultimate last appearance on TV around 1991 as noted on the typical control male (M / F):

“Even with a curved knife in the belly he will stammer out one last ideological cliché, because ideology is his life. ”

An example of a naive Dane, whose brains are eaten up by ideology

The rest who are not interested in ideology – including their own unconscious influence them – has heard of terrorism and seen it on TV,
perhaps read about terrorism on a blog in a book or a newspaper.

When we in this argument insists that it officially comes to growth all the way around, it’s because we want to see in black and white around the 12th February, the influx continues full game without that in truth is no shift in the composition of immigrater we otherwise have heard repeated many times in the first half of 2009 – it is as long too late.

January 20, 2010

Tomorrow Is G-Day

In its death throes, Eutopia has decided to smash the lights of liberty.
Mark Steyn

after the murders of Pym Fortuym and Theo van Gogh

a line has been draw


According to: http://www.geertwilders.nl/
CNN) — Controversial Dutch lawmaker Geert Wilders appeared in court Wednesday on charges of inciting discrimination and hatred that relate in part to his much-criticized film about Islam.

Wednesday’s session at the Court of Amsterdam was a pre-trial hearing and a full trial was due to begin later this year. A court spokesman said the hearing was expected to last one day but could stretch into Thursday.

Wilders, who heads the Dutch Party for Freedom, said he has done nothing wrong. “I will fight,” he promised in a statement Tuesday on the party’s Web site.

Prosecutors initially decided not to pursue the case, saying in June 2008 that Wilders’ statements were not liable to punishment, the Public Prosecutions Service said. They said that even though Wilders’ comments were “defamatory and hurtful to a great number of Muslims,” they fell within the limits of free speech.

November 12, 2009

CAIR’s Inner Workings Exposed

Filed under: Alliances, Demographics, Emigration, Islam, migration, perspectives, Research — jensn @ 5:10 pm

Excerpt from: http://www.danielpipes.org/7689/cair-inner-workings-exposed

The Council on American-Islamic Relations has, since its founding in 1994, served as the Islamist movement in North America’s most high-profile, belligerent, manipulative, and aggressive agency. From its headquarters in Washington, D.C., CAIR also sets the agenda and tone for the entire Wahhabi lobby.

A substantial body of criticism about CAIR exists, some of by me, but until now, the group’s smash-mouths and extremists have managed to survive all revelations about its record. The publication today of Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That’s Conspiring to Islamize America (WND Books) may, however, change the equation.

Written by P. David Gaubatz and Paul Sperry, the investigation is based largely on the undercover work of Gaubatz’s son Chris who spent six months as an intern at CAIR’s D.C. headquarters in 2008. In that capacity, he acquired 12,000 pages of documentation and took 300 hours of video.

———————————————

The consequence of uncritical and blind copying:

I saw Gates of Vienna refer to this CAIR as a main and proper source of information on the number of muslims in USA and in Europe. And that was long before: http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2009/11/incredible-shrinking-cair.html. Unfortunately you can’t search in any effective way on their website, but we find what have to find:

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2006/10/numbers-game.html#readfurther:

TUESDAY, OCTOBER 31, 2006

 

 

The Numbers Game

Where Gates of Vienna tells us in details of the percentages of muslims in almost every Western European nation. 13,4 – 21 mill. altogether (ours: how cute!).

According to CAIR’s website,

“There is no scientific count of Muslims in the U.S. Six to seven million is the most commonly cited figure…

That number sounds a bit low, even to me, Baron Bodissey writes….” Sounds, Seems, is it just pure feelings without any rational basic at all? Why take up the theme, when it certainly and quite obvious is not within your qualifications to do so?

WHY???

There were more, also in Denmark. The media were very keen to report for them.

September 21, 2009

Civil War In France

Media silent

Radical muslims in apartment houses in France are fighting an “intifada” against the Police with violent collisions that injure 14 policemen a day. The Ministry of Interior informe that 2.500 were injured this year.

Fra: http://blog.tv2.dk/literally/entry336142.html (in Danish) Socialism and dhimmicracy, Video: Former KGB Yuri Bezmenov: How To Brainwash A Nation – Full Version (klik på play-knappen for at starte video):

May 13, 2009

Correction of the German population balance

i

Correction of the German population balance

In the Federal Republic of Germany Population, ultimo year 2007: 82,217,800

Of these, following the official number of immigrants: 7,257,000 (8.83%)

Number of naturalizations for the period 1980-2007 is officially: 3,814,730 (4.64%)

27

Σ N (x) * (1 + r) ^ x, where N (x) is the number of naturalizations in each year, r is the average net growth rate by birth a year of the naturalized with effect from the year of naturalization, x varies 0 to 27

x = 0

The expected number of children after the naturalization (1980-2007): 2,076,058 (2.53%)

Results: 13,147,788 are migrants or descent from migrants (16%) ,

and 69,070,012 Germans in Germany.

This leads to approximately 20% of the birthgiving women are immigrants, and the following equilibrium applies:

0.20 * 3.5 + 0.80 * x = 1.37, where x is

Fertilty of the German women, on average 0.85 children,

if the fertility of migrants in the average is 3.5 children and the general fertility in Germany was 1.37 on average in 2007.

Assume migration continues at the 2007-level with 43.912 plus 156.942 naturalization a year and the growth-rate by foreign births of 4% a year: PV=13,147,788   PMT=200,854   i=4%   n=30:  FV=51,445,585

Projection of the number immigrants and their descendants, year 2037: 51,445,585

With German fertility at 0.85 you face a negative rate of -0.97% a year: 69,070,012*(1-0.0097)^30 = 51,557,625

Projection of the Germans, year 2037: 51,557,625

The biggest group, muslims then take over 13 years later. Compare with the video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-3X5hIFXYU

Sonia

May 10, 2009

Number of granted citizenships in UK 1997-2007 – and a correction of the number of immigrants

Number of British citizenships in an 11 years period

1997-2007 – including a correction of the number of

foreign immigrants

Kilde : http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs08/hosb0508.pdf

Number of granted British citizenship a year 1997-2007:

image001

In the period 1997 to 2007 1,197,640 british citizenships were granted – with 7-11 percent refusials of applications behind.

Most of the approved applicants had the latest earlier citizenship in Asia, Africa and the Middle East. This means we have to account with a growth rate of 4% a year caused by the births among the naturalized in UK.

Alone thoss 11 years’ of granting British citizenship has lead to a population increase of British citizens of 1,397,640 who are counted as british citizens, even though the fertility and other culture are most different from that of the Brits – fertility 3 times higher.

In 2004 the Non-British were official estimated to 8.9 percent of the population, in 2007 this share rose to 10.7 percent, compare with: http://danmark.wordpress.com/2009/05/08/the-united-kingdom-will-have-17-7-mio-more-within-the-next-25-years-det-forenede-kongerige-opererer-fortsat-med-gigantisk-indvandring-i-sine-planer/

This increase will not surprise when you have realized that the total population growth come entirely from an explosive growing immigration, births among the foreign citizens, and in addition the births by the naturalized and their children. The British births do not replace the number of deads and emigrated Brits, the number British births is 43 percent too small. 

This implies that 5.090 million foreigners have to added to the number of children and grandchildren born by naturalised in UK, and we maintain that the number then is more than doubled, if all naturalized children are incounted. Then the share of foreigners is 11-12 millions of totally 61 millions in 2009 – 18-20 percent

Our estimate is totally safe after we have analysed the development of immigration to Denmark and the development of granting of citizenships in Denmark in the period 1979-2006: http://www.lilliput-information.com/uscan.html

Just the 11 years period 1997-2007 in UK add up til 1,397,640 that have to be added to the 5,090,000 Non-UK born foreigners. The longer a period that is corrected the more children have to be added.

Earlier citizenship among the naturalized in 2007:

image002

Please listen and see (and imagine it even worse) :

http://danmark.wordpress.com/2009/05/05/europaeerne-rendes-over-ende-med-stoerste-hast-amerikansk-dokument/

 

Sonia

May 8, 2009

The United Kingdom will have 17.7 mio more within the next 25 years

i

The United Kingdom

According to: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/hub/population/migration/international-migration/index.html

tim19912007graph1_tcm119-23658

UK for the period 2004 to 2007.
The size of the UK born population has remained constant throughout the
four year period at around 54 million. In contrast, the non-UK population
has increased from an estimated 5.2 million in 2004 to 6.3 million in
2007, an increase of 21 per cent. In 2004, an estimated 8.9 per cent of
the total population was non-UK born; by 2007 this had increased to

10.6 per cent.

UK for the period 2004 to 2007

UK for the period 2004 to 2007
The size of the UK born population has remained constant throughout the four year period at around 54 million. In contrast, the non-UK population has increased from an estimated 5.2 million in 2004 to 6.3 million in 2007, an increase of 21 per cent. In 2004, an estimated 8.9 per cent of the total population was non-UK born; by 2007 this had increased to 10.6 per cent. Irish and immigrants from the old EU-countries amounted to 1.252 in 2007. This means 5.090 million foreigners. In addition comes the UK born as children and grandchildren of naturalized foreign parents.
Compared with Danish relations the total number of foreigners in UK is 11-12 millions of the entire population of about 61 millioner – i.e. 18-20 percent.

Remember Austria, An Excerpt: “…Max Planck Intitute for Demographic Research reports officially that Austria had 16.6% non-Austrians in the country ultimo 2004. Those non-Austrians do not include naturalized who are born by immigrants in Austria and not grandchildren of immigrants either. This implies that 16.6% has to be even higher, if we intend to count the percentage of inhabitants of foreign origine in Austria…”

18-20 percent in UK also fit the check of births-shares and fertilities:

3.5*x + 1.2*(1-x) =1.87, implies x, the share of ethnic foreign births = 29 percent

Compare with what the media find is fit for you to know

Daily Express – 8.6. 2007: 1,5 million muslims’ ??

Another source: The Muslim population in Britain has grown by more than 500,000 to 2.4 million in just four years, according to official research collated forThe Times. The population multiplied 10 times faster than the rest of society, the research by the Office for National Statistics reveals. In the same period the number of Christians in the country fell by more than 2 million (??).

According to: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/hub/population/population-change/population-projections/index.html

graph1_tcm119-29018

Source: National population projections and much more details

With a general or total fertility of 1.87 children per woman (and not 2.1) one would expect a decrease of the population by almost 11% for the projected period of 25 years. But the official expectation points at an increase of 18% instead. All in all a difference of about 29% of the population. This implies that 17.7 mill. more is expected to immigrate to The United Kingdom (at 61 mio. in 2007) within the next 25 years if fertility is assume constant.

The patterns are the same as here, ‘but painted with an eleven times smaller brush’. More foreign immigrants contribute tremendously to the rise in fertility.

The British do not.

But total fertility is not expected to be constant. Total fertility is the weighed average of ethnic fertilities with populations shares as weights .

graph1_tcm119-23935

Source: Office for National Statistics and more details

This means births or immigration implying the same results, and patterns of culture included fertility are much like here.

If you want to read a piece by piece distribution of ethnicity (the closest you get) it is partly possible here (take a very big breath before you click on the link and go to page 34)

http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_population/Population_trends_135.pdf (page 34)

Sonia

May 5, 2009

Europe comes to an end sooner than you perhaps think

i

This video illustrate briefly where the

Europeans stands

It can’t be underlined too often:  All fertilities refered to in this video and almost elsewhere are total fertilities that are the weighted  average of the fertilities the ethnic groups in nation that is focused on. This implies that the dismantling run much quicker that also this video shows – 30-40 percent quicker. (Read the Austrian example linked to below):

When you hear fertility 8 in Türkei it is not quite right, if it does not mean that there are born 8 time more children relatively. More young and younger birthgiving women and more children each. In the third world 10 times more births relatively compared with the number of inhabitants is rather common. It is the birth-frequency, not the fertility.

Deciding complement:

https://dissidentpress.wordpress.com/2009/04/16/predictability-and-responsibility-ruthless-optimism-and-blind-self-sacrifice/

Austrian women and Max Planck Institute for Demographics – brief version:

https://dissidentpress.wordpress.com/2009/04/18/austrian-women-persistent-low-fertility-since-1980s/

Sonia

April 21, 2009

The Real Thing: The Third Jihad – Radical Islam’s Vision For America

ialfbaabl1

The Third Jihad – Radical Islam’s Vision For

America

What is the Third Jihad? The Third Jihad exposes the war the media is not telling you about. It reveals the enemy our government is too afraid to name. One person who is not afraid to tell you the truth is Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, a Muslim American and former physician to the US Congress. After the FBI releases a radical Islamist manifesto describing how to destroy America from within, Dr. Jasser decides to investigate. The Third Jihad is about what he discovered. Interviews are conducted with radical Islamists in the US and the leaders trying to stop them, such as Rudy Giuliani, Clinton CIA Director Jim Woolsey, NYC Police Commissioner Ray Kelly, Senator Joe Lieberman, former Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge, and former terrorist group member Tawfik Hamid. http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/5520390/The.Third.Jihad.2008.DVDRip.XviD-SPRiNTER run time: 1:11:17

It comes to an end with Europe sooner than you think

April 19, 2009

Official Danish Demographic Information is not OK

Women in Austria: Brief version about Austrian women and their fertility

Max Planck Intitute for Demographic Research reports officially that Austria had 16.6% non-Austrians in the country ultimo 2004. Those non-Austrians do not include naturalized who are born by immigrants in Austria and not grandchildren of immigrants either. This implies that 16.6% has to be even higher, if we intend to count the percentage of inhabitants of foreign origine in Austria. In addition the net influx has increased the number further since 2004. A relatively stable and minor number of Westeners has to be subtracted. The official number of foreign citizens in Austria amounted to 9.6% ultimo 2004, we are informed by the same source.

Max Planck Intitute for Demographic Research reports further that the total fertility among women is 1.4 child in Austria , and this number has been persistently stable since the midd 1980s. Eurostat (the Statical Bureau of EU) reported in 2004 that total fertility in Austria was 1.42. In 2005 CIA reported that the total fertility in Austria was 1.36. We know immigrant women from South Asia, the Middle East and Africa give birth to 3-4 children in average. The foreign ethnic fertilty is then 3 to 4 in average. For the total fertility to end up at 1.4 in the country a certain percentage of foreign women has contributed to the births, and a another certain percentage of Austrian women has to give other child-births. As there is a coherence between the percentage of birth-giving women, percentage of population, the fertility among the birth-giving women and the total fertility, it is possible to calculate/estimate the fertility to about 1 child among Austrian women, when we have information about the percentage of non-Austrian (>16.6%) and about the total fertility in Austria (1.4 child). Austrian ethnic fertility is close to 1 like in Germany.

Absolutely none of the results we get on this basic harmonize in any way to any degree with the official information we get about Danish Demografic relations.

The information on Austria originate from Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, and the information (different from the official one) about Danish Demografic relations or about other European Demografic relations that matches the present reported information about Austria, originate from Information of Denmark

Official reliable version

Calculating version with the exposure using the official Austrian information approved by Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research

Grafic illustration of the difference between the second best and the best projection

 

J. E. Vig, 19 April 2009

www.lilliput-information.com

 

Graphic illustration of the difference between the second best and best projection of population in Europe

Why should we be modest when we have proven we are right?

The graphic illustration of the difference:

Excerpt from:
Europe in the twilight of its demographics
Jehu Lentius – 1.12. 2008

“Now the reader should see the film ‘The Third Jihad’ (Trinity, 2008). It is bothering, no doubt, but the situation in the USA is still several dimensions better than in Europe. In an interview with Mark Steyn commenting the general conviction that the Muslims in Europe ‘are so few, only some percent of the population’, he says: “Many people think it will ‘take centuries’ for them to become majorities”, there is shown the likely demographic devel­opment of Muslims and non-Muslims calculated for France’s actual fertility rates of 1.4 vs. 3.8…” :

unreal

(Excerpt continued)
“The result may surprise the optimist: The break even point is reached before the end of our century – around 2087. And this is merely a calculation on the basis of the demographic reproduction rates, not even considering (1) the ongoing family reuniting, (2) continuous further immigration, (3) the illegal immigrants of today (suppos­edly millions), (4) continuous illegal immigration, (5) repeated amnesties for hidden immigrants (as a strong motivation for trafficking of asylum seekers), (6) the fact that Muslim fertility could be increased deliberately as conscious means of politics (already outspoken by many Muslim leaders), (7) increasing emigration of endogen­ous Europeans (which already has begun in several countries), and (8) that political decisions during their grow­ing democratic power could lower the obstacles for Muslim immigration or even facilitate it (e.g., the EU-Africa commitments of the EU-Mediterranean ‘Barcelona Process’ etc.). All these powerful factors included, a better demographic simulation than the one above could result in a much more bothering timeline…”

But I’am afraid the truth is it dismantles 40-50 p.c. quicker than even Jehu Lentius imagined or calculated 1.12.2008, especially if you look critically at the official figures as we certainly did last summer in order to come closest to the truth. Our three alternative rising curves then begin a little higher on the y-axis, because we naturally have corrected til startingpoint i.e. made a corrected realistic population balanced sheet before we projected the groups of population, but our curves do not even rise as fast as does those refered to or calculated by Jehu Lentius 1.12.2008. And even then the three rising curves intersect with the falling curve at least 40 year earlier:

 

It comes to end with Europe sooner than you think 

‘Some will certainly contradict us persistently and perhaps one might even point out that the first diagram concerns France, the second Denmark. But does this really matter when I tell you that France might come first.’

Now I would prefered some video – all in good time

Sonia

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.