GERMANY AND EUROPE DRIVEN TO SUICIDE CAUSED BY A FABLE FROM UN

http://www.lilliput-information.com/engaldring3.pdf

Extracts:

With IQ average of 90 or less in a group it is expected to top 50% of the individuals in the group suitable for education-training and working. Therefore it has been concluded that they can be taken in this direction in the blind, to bear children, perhaps live on welfare or they just have unrealistic expectations of the recipient country. The fact that almost 53 % represents IQ average less than IQ 90 in 2014 (see page 18 just below the table and diagram 19 A) will increase crime risk /prevalence of crime due to the immigration while reducing training and labor market suitability further in the future in the total group of foreign origin in Denmark, as it is growing

If it is assumed that 16,343 mill. of foreign origins in 2012 – as a result of the so-called census shows – a realistic respective share in the status point primo 2015 is 21 percent of the population, when the correction about naturalization and the descendants of the naturalized from alternative 2 and status relatively is displaced from 11,2 in alternative 2 to 16,3 mill., the development in IQ-average in Germany will change from 98.2 I 2015 to 90.4 I 2072, med 97.2 in 2025 and 93.9 in 2052. IQ-average drops 7.8 IQ-points in 57 years 2015-2072. Among the foreign origins from 88.3 to 79.6. The possibilities of businesses will vanish because about the half of the population in Germany is not skilled for education or work in 57 years, if the immigration continues unchanged.
The share of foreign origin increases to 49 percent of well 105 mill. totally in the population in 2072 assumed the immigration continues as in 2014 with an unchanged division on origins..

BEHEADING IN ISLAM – VIDEO BY AND WITH DR. BILL WARNER

Source: Dr. Bill Warner: http://www.politicalislam.com/beheading-in-islam/ (video)

When you hear of beheading, do you assume that Islam is involved? Beheading is an integral part of Islam. Mohammed repeatedly ordered people beheaded and the Koran even includes beheading. Beheading is threatened to settle arguments about Islam. Men were … Read More>>

…………….

Extract from : http://10news.dk/?p=1633

“…European cities today: houndreds of thousands of Muslims live in them, they are born and raised in our humanistic, democratic societies, but still they stick to their own culture and values. and still so many of them – probably a majority of the young – support the literal, violent, jihadi version of Islam: Generation Jihad is here! 80 percent of young Turks in Holland see “nothing wrong” in waging Jihad against non-Muslims. 27 percent of all young French and 14 percent of all young British under 25 sympathize with the genocidal terror organisation Islamic State. This includes most probably the vast majority of young Muslims in these two countries. These horrific numbers fit well with the fact that 75 percent of Muslims in Europe think that the Quran must be taken literally…”

“…Lots of horrific, must-know statistics here: Who is Generation Jihad and Surveys: Majority of Europeans is against spread of Islam…”

Jihadist Ideology and Strategy – not understood by the West

Published first time 2007

The Key to Jihadist Ideology and Strategy
By: Lawrence Auster
FrontPageMagazine.com | Monday, August 16, 2004

When trying to explain the Islamists’ global campaign of mass murder, both liberals and conservatives, despite their fierce mutual disagreements, make the same underlying mistake. People on the anti-war left believe that Al Qaeda attacked us because we’re imperialist, or because we’re racist, or because we don’t do enough for Third-World hunger (yes, there are people who actually believe the hunger argument; most of them are Episcopalians). By contrast, many people on the pro-war right, especially President Bush, believe that the Islamists hate us for our freedoms, opportunities, and overall success as a society. In other words, the left believes that the Islamists hate us for our sins, and the right believes that they hate us for our virtues. Both sides commit the same narcissistic fallacy of thinking that the Islamist holy war against the West revolves solely around ourselves, around the moral drama of our goodness or our wickedness, rather than having something to do with Islam itself.

A very different perspective on the Islamist challenge comes from Mary Habeck, a military historian at Yale University. Speaking at the Heritage Foundation on August 13, Habeck said that the various jihadist groups base their war against non-Moslems on the Islamic sacred writings, particularly the Sira, which, unlike the Koran, tells the Prophet’s life in chronological sequence. Using Muhammed as their model, the jihadis live and think and act within paradigms provided by the stages of Muhammed’s political and military career. According to Habeck, this internally driven logic of Islam, and not any particular provocation, real or imagined, by some outside power, is the key to understanding why the jihadis do what they do.

The first stage or paradigm is Muhammed’s early life in Mecca, a non-Islamic society where no Islamic way of life is possible, and where Moslems are powerless and oppressed. The second paradigm is the hejira, the escape from Mecca to Medina, a new place that is more pure and where a true Islamic society and state can be founded. After this Islamic state is formed, the third paradigm kicks in. This is jihad, organized violence against non-Moslems for the purpose of building up the wealth and power of the Islamic community and bringing the world under a single Islamic state. Jihadists conceive and rationalize their own activities in terms of these paradigms. Thus when Osama bin Laden left Saudi Arabia for Sudan, and when he later left Sudan for Afghanistan, he saw those journeys as corresponding with the hejira, leaving a corrupt land, where he was powerless, for a more pure Islamic place from which jihad could be waged.

In addition to the three stages in the growth of the Islamic community culminating in jihad, there are three basic approaches to waging jihad, called collectively the Method of Muhammed, that various Islamist groups respectively adopt toward the ultimate goal of establishing the world-wide rule of Islam. The jihadis’ choice of method depends on whom they see as their immediate enemy in that larger struggle; each jihadist group, moveover, is defined by which of these methods it adopts. The first method is to fight the Near Enemy prior to fighting the Far Enemy. The Near Enemy is anyone inside Islamic lands, whether it is an occupier or someone who has taken away territory that used to be Islamic. The second method is to fight the Greater Unbelief—the major enemy, which today is the United States—before the Lesser Unbelief. And the third method is to fight the Apostates first, and then the other Unbelievers. Apostates are false Moslems, people who call themselves Moslems but aren’t, a group that includes secularist Moslems such as Saddam Hussein as well as Shi’ites, who are considered heretics.

It is these notions, deeply embedded in the jidadis’ reading of the life of Muhammed, and not determined by what is happening in what we think of as the real world, that determine their major strategic directions and whom they choose to kill. For example, the terrorists who murdered 190 people in Madrid on March 11, 2004 did not target Spain because of its involvement with the U.S.-led Iraqi reconstruction; the group had been planning the Madrid attack for two years, going back to before the American invasion of Iraq. They attacked Spain because it was the Near Enemy—a formerly Islamic land that they hoped to win back for Islam. Similarly, regarding the all-important question whether the Wahhabist Osama bin Laden would have been willing to work with the secularist Apostate Saddam Hussein in an attack on America, Habeck says it is entirely possible, because bin Laden believes that his primary enemy is the Greater Unbelief, the United States, and therefore in the short term he would cooperate with an Apostate such as Hussein. Then, after America had been finished off with Hussein’s help, bin Laden with the enhanced power and prestige gained from that victory could redirect the jihad back at Hussein and other Moslem Apostates.

The key point is that, while specific actions by the West might provoke the jihadis to greater attacks, their fundamental strategic and military decisions are not determined by anything done by the United States or Europe or by other major enemies of Islam such as the Hindus, but rather by which Method of Muhammed each jihadi faction follows, and each of these strategies has its own internal rationality, though it is not a rationality that makes sense in non-Islamic terms.

The same is true for Wahhabism itself, says Habeck. Wahhabism began in the 18th century when there was no Western colonial power in the Islamic world; it was not set off by any Western intrusion into the Moslem lands. Similarly, the contemporary Islamist idea that America is the center of all that is evil in the world, making America the “Greater Unbelief”, was conceived by a Moslem scholar between 1948 and 1951 when he was residing in the United States. This was decades before the U.S. had any large-scale involvement with Israel, and decades before its culture spiraled downhill, though, from the point of view of that visiting Moslem, America was already quite decadent at that point and ripe for destruction.

What is most striking in the Method of Muhammed is the utter absence of any transcendent notion of morality. Unlike in traditional Western religion and philosophy, where God or the Good is the measure of human actions, in Islamism (which after all is simply a pure form of Islam) the measure of human actions is the shifting power tactics and military strategies of a desert brigand and war leader.

Lawrence Auster is the author of Erasing America: The Politics of the Borderless Nation. He offers his traditionalist conservative perspective at View from the Right

Recommend this site

What the West Needs to Know (wait 25 sec.):

Asylum Seekers, Beheaders and Mega Mosques

One Month of Islam in Europe: April 2015

by Soeren Kern

May 24, 2015 at 5:00 am

• Hackers claiming to belong to the Islamic State attacked TV5Monde, a French television network, and knocked it off the air globally. The network broadcasts in more than 200 countries. “Our websites and social media sites are no longer under our control.” — Yves Bigot, Director General, TV5Monde.

• “We hate no one. We fight for our freedom and hence we object to totalitarian Islam, but we do not hate Muslims…. I am happy that we in the Netherlands and in Germany are allowed to demonstrate against each other. Without violence. Without hatred.” — Geert Wilders, Dresden, Germany, April 13, 2015.

• “I’ve come here [to Syria] to behead infidels. I am ready. At some point, we’ll be in Switzerland.” — Jihadist who has had a Swiss passport since 1995, in a social media message.

• In Austria, a new report from the Federal Criminal Police (Bundeskriminalamt) revealed that 34,070 illegal immigrants arrived in Austria in 2014, a 24% jump over 2013. Most of the migrants came from Syria, Iraq, Somalia, Eritrea and Kosovo. More than half, roughly 20,750 of the migrants, hired smugglers to bring them to Austria; the remainder arrived on their own. More than two-thirds of the migrants arrived from Italy (51.6%) and Hungary (34.4%).

• On April 7, Austrian Foreign Minister Sebastian Kurz called on the European Union to launch a military operation against the Islamic State. He also called for a crackdown on so-called foreign fighters in Europe. Kurz said: “We are a militarily neutral country, but in terms of the Islamic State, our position is clear: Humanitarian aid for the victims is necessary, but much more needs to be done.”

A NEW STOCKHOLM WITHIN 6 YEARS – in Danish and English plus a video in English

Dette er den nærmeste fremtid i Sverige

Den svenske politiske elite har planer om en ny by (i Stockholm), finansieret fuldtud af de svenske skatteydere for at tilpasse til den massive bølge af tilstrømmende immigranter. Denne radikale plan indeholder også forslag om konfiskation af sommerhuse og konvertering af gamle historiske bygninger og kirker for at tilfredsstille de nye immigranter. Imidlertid, det svenske velfærdssystem er frit faldende, da politikerne lider af Stockholm syndromet i forsøget på at være en humanitær supermagt. Hjemmehørende svenske er udvalgt til at bære klodens vægt, hvor eliten vil ofre de hjemmehørende svenskere på multikulturalismens alter.

Trods advarsler fra FN i 2008 besluttede EU i 2009 med Lissabontraktaten som såkaldt forpligtende dokument at indsluse 50 millioner flere ikke-vestlige immigranter, endda 50 millioner afrikanske arbejdere, foruden de mindst 50 millioner ikke-vestlige, der allerede var sluset ind i Europa. Og så er der de andre:

“Partileder i Centerpartiet, Annie Lööf, mener Sverige kan ta imot over 30 millioner mennesker. Dette for å hjelpe på “morgendagens behov for velferd”. Det er som bekendt ikke nødvendigt – så langtfra – at vide noget eller at kunne fatte noget pr. logik ved brug af hjernen for at få taleret og have endog de kraftigste talerør.

UN and the little lady above:

Despite warnings from the UN in 2008, the EU decided in 2009 by the Treaty of Lisbon as so-called binding document to smuggle in 50 million more non-Western immigrants, even 50 million African workers, in addition to at least 50 million non-western already was channeled into Europe. And then there are the others:

“Party leader of the Centre Party, Annie Lööf, believes Sweden can take 30 million immigrants more. This to assist with “tomorrow’s need for welfare.” (Mine: ?????). It is of course not necessary – so far – to know anything or to comprehend anything per. logic by use of the brain to have the right to speak, and even with the most powerful voice.

This is the nearest future in Sweden

The Swedish political elite have plans to build a new city, funded entirely by Swedish taxpayers, to accommodate the massive wave of incoming immigrants. This radical plan also proposes the confiscation of summer homes and the conversion of old historical buildings and churches in order to facilitate the arrival of new immigrants. Meanwhile, Sweden’s welfare system is plummeting as politicians suffer from Stockholm syndrome, trying to be a “humanitarian superpower.” Native Swedes have been chosen to carry the weight of the world, sacrificing themselves on the altar of multiculturalism.

Kilden hertil med supplement: http://snaphanen.dk/2015/05/01/a-new-stockholm-to-be-built-within-6-years/

EUROPE DRIVEN TO SUICIDE

…The real economic downturn (the lack of growth in production) due to competition on wages, other labor costs and a sea of charges, leading the labor-intensive productions away to low-wage areas or to knee and closure. Since we can not compete in the same productions with wages that are 8-10 times lower than under the Danish taxation-welfare-wage level, was a conversion of programs, productions and industries essential. This situation of wage competition will be in effect for many years to come, and the transition has been neglected the first least 35 år.The tax base is simply being eroded while the reflag and closures continue with increasing speed. In addition a dominant immigration has been ac-cepted from højfertile low-IQ countries/regions, of which half or less than half are suitable for training and labor: The fol-lowing percentages of the foreign origins are unfit for work and education in Denmark (DK), Ty (Germany), No (Norway) and in the United Kingdom (UK):

Government debt has to be settled at least kept strictly under control in Germany, England and Denmark, and in addi-tion growing aging problems to become bigger and bigger throughout Europe with additional public expenditure on older upheld the approach to the working ages increasingly deteriorated due lack of births. The problem with the lack of births over Europe was created by pervasive welfare systems elitist promoters (not citizens). Since the effects of which turned out to mainly lack of population reproduction, the same responsible felt the need to consider the most fertile immigrants to come. The ideology promised just the elite that education was simply a matter to anyone who came here.

A country like Norway might make such an idea real due its oil fund and the country’s huge outstanding debts, but it did not. Every country has to create an active future, a dynamic business and educational development with demand generation and earnings purposes. Otherwise welfare can not be financed in the long run. UN warned against the taxation financed higher education with free access already known in Danish Perspective Plan II in 1974. The listed problems, Europe can not solve at the same time by changing some of the items on the finance laws, cut a little here and there, order some more payment instruments issued and thus create nominal or only inflation growth, so the increase in pro-duction display similar to real growth, but is nothing more than nominal growth equivalent to inflation or less. This will just worsen the problems and slow down/impossible to do any conversion. It is the traffic that is driven so far in this country. Not only Denmark is threatened by the killing stagflation (stagnation and inflation at the same time), but also the other European countries with a few exceptions. With negative growth for three consecutive years, while the government debt increased with the increase in domestic consumption has been running and was started with the so-called financial crisis as a result. The expansion must therefore be ensured by production life to get a solution that is not tempting inflation-prone….

Read the entire analysis in pdf-file: http://www.lilliput-information.com/Europe-driven-to-Suicide.pdf

GROWTH IN THE ERA OF IMMIGRATION SEEN FROM EUROPE

One key issue during the immigration era

If you prefer a pdf-version: http://www.lilliput-information.com/growth and immigration.pdf

Economic real growth:

Welfare must be financed either collectively through taxes or by private insurance, while the countries must be able to maintain and even develop their technological skills, because welfare funding sources originate from earnings. The value of the profitable production creates wage basis and tax basis, of which welfare can be funded either privately or collectively. There are no other sources.

More production to meet demand for consumption is the problem, it appears to be valid. More production requires more resources. Germany is not self-sufficient in energy resources, the UK is not in agricultural products and food, Norway has focused mostly on financial investments and homely infrastructure improvements, but invested very little of the wealth in real production outside the oil industry. What you are not self-sufficient must be purchased abroad. With econo-mies in a near standstill, there is no solution in sight that can be exchanged enough goods and services to be able to support twice as many welfare payments and by no means 3-4 times as many as in Germany and the UK.

Real growth in Norway, Germany, UK and Denmark was respectively 0.6, 0.5, 1.7 and 0.4 per cent. in 2013. Real growth is the growth in the profitable production adjusted for inflation. In the EU28, the overall real growth of 0.1 per cent. in 2013. And in the first quarters of 2014 even real stagnation.

Can sufficient difference or margin be realized by a lower level of production, implemented production in earning companies might continue at the lower level, also in terms of employment, if the best alternative is worse. The latter is not the case when we look at the situation in most of the welfare-ridden European countries. Passive return outside the production line or production abroad may be preferable. Therefore, the purchasing power flows to private capital outside the production line or out of the country. The labor-intensive company relocate in these years, and it did not come as a surprise here in recent years. It began with the increased international competition already from the end of 1970s. US and UK took the first steps to adapt to this inevitable development.

Businesses/companies do not invest due to price margins, but due to sufficient profit-making price/cost margins. The problem is not one-dimensonal, but at least two and often multi-dimensional. The economic reality is that it is the manufacturers who drive the economy forward in any country, the savings are con-sidered to be fuel in the process. Private consumption and government consumption produces nothing but maintenance of production equipment with no new initiatives, state debt (especially in a foreign dependent country like Denmark) and waste.

What consumers give out or expect from the future make no walk in the economy, but consumption maintains as mentioned the apparatus, possibly to sleep; the second has never happened and will never happen. Sometimes we hear economics commentators report that the cost of private consumption represents so many percent of the total demand. It has no other meaning than that private consumption rises even more damage to the immediate funding problems countries face with and draining the undertakings to the capital. The country’s leaders are still of the opinion that their initiatives will work regardless it never happened.

October 1996: The 1000 major Danish companies are planning to invest 45 bill. kr. and create 50,000 jobs outside the country for the next 5 years (1997-2002), reported in the study done by Monday Morning Weekly. It was the very beginning to discouragement at home. There are worrying feature at all levels of the country’s competence pyramid. Denmark to focus on creating jobs with high knowledge content. There is no future in low-wage production and ditto jobs. They will greatly move abroad caused by globalization of markets (ie competition) , as it is impossible to protect themselves against with anything other than by trade restrictions. It was 18 years ago. Workers of free travel for work is almost entirely relevant in Europe. High-IQ immigration from Southeast Asia began to USA and UK in the 1980s, and there is no more to get.

”30 percent of school leavers do not get a professional education and training (1996). Large unemployment. Criticism of content and effect of the adult educations. Increasing criticism of the folk school results. High-tech and knowledge-intensive environments is not only created in businesses, but the basis is created in the research, vocational schools and already in the early years of teaching. Knowledge intensive jobs is an end product where the quality of what goes on in preschools and elementary school, also plays a role, and in what can be called Denmark’s competence pyramid. It beginns down at the pre-school, creches, then comes Primary school, so working without business skills training, upper secondary and vocational education, higher educa-tion, public and private research, production methods in business and finally business products” (Monday Morning Weekly wrote)

November 5, 2014 survey shows Entrepreneur Of The Year, the number of companies with strong growth in Denmark has fallen by 16 percent in one year. It’s the same companies that create new jobs.

The basic problem is that we simply have no other nature granted in Denmark to do good than salt, lime, clay, a little oil, a little gas, a little farming and beaches if we do not educate ourselves by the market and IQ dictates and provides production results of our knowledge. Everything else should be purchased abroad. But sooner than many imagine it will not do to buy raw materials and other things abroad because we have become so expensive even with our goods and even much lower educated compared to earlier when goods prices are taken into account, fewer and fewer will buy the products that come out of it from here. Denmark has simply been dormant (with a few notable exceptions in business) since the beginning of 1980s under the successive governments that have promised this and that; Unfortunately, without really knowing the consequences of what they were doing prematurely and what they did not do in time.

The real economic downturn (the lack of growth in production) due to competition on wages, other labor costs and a sea of charges, leading the labor-intensive productions away to low-wage areas or to knee and closure. Since we can not compete in the same productions with wages that are 8-10 times lower than under the Danish taxation-welfare-wage level, was a conversion of programs, productions and industries essential. This situation of wage competition will be in effect for many years to come, and the transition has been neglected the first least 35 år.The tax base is simply being eroded while the reflag and closures continue with increasing speed. In addition a dominant immigration has been accepted from high-fertile low-IQ countries/regions, of which half or less than half are suitable for training and labor: The following percentages of the foreign origins are unfit for work and education in Denmark (DK), Ty (Germany), No (Norway) and in the United Kingdom (UK):

                                                                            Percentage of foreign origin not skilled for work and education

1 January 2014 48.5 to 52.8 per cent. of all immigrants and their children in Denmark had a foreign origin in countries with less than IQ90 on average (depending on choice of birth rates in the projection model for IQ). That is, more than half are not suitable for education and work in Denmark. With IQ average of 90 or less in a group, regardless of ethnic background less than 50 per cent of the individuals in the group is suitable for education and work demonstrated by Arthur Robert Jensen (1923 to 2012). With the new projection of 6 April 2015 and proposed birth rates (CBR) of Alsagerskolen: The percentage of foreign origins with IQ less than 90 grew from 39 to 59 per cent. from 1980 to 2015 and continues steadily to 66 in 2058 and 71 per cent. in the 2072.

Government debt has to be settled at least kept strictly under control in Germany, England and Denmark, and in addi-tion growing aging problems to become bigger and bigger throughout Europe with additional public expenditure on older upheld the approach to the working ages increasingly deteriorated due lack of births. The problem with the lack of births over Europe was created by pervasive welfare systems elitist promoters (not citizens). Since the effects of which turned out to mainly lack of population reproduction, the same responsible felt the need to consider the most fertile immigrants to come. The ideology promised just the elite that education was simply a matter to anyone who came here.

A country like Norway might make such an idea real due its oil fund and the country’s huge outstanding debts, but it did not. Every country has to create an active future, a dynamic business and educational development with demand generation and earnings purposes. Otherwise welfare can not be financed in the long run. UN warned against the taxation financed higher education with free access already known in Danish Perspective Plan II in 1974. The listed problems, Europe cannot solve at the same time by changing some of the items on the finance laws, cut a little here and there, order some more payment instruments issued and thus create nominal or only inflation growth, so the increase in production display similar to real growth, but is nothing more than nominal growth equivalent to inflation or less. This will just worsen the problems and slow down/make it impossible to do any conversion. It is the traffic that is driven so far in this country. Not only Denmark is threatened by the killing stagflation (stagnation and inflation at the same time), but also the other European countries with a few exceptions. With negative growth for three consecutive years, while the go-vernment debt increased with the increase in domestic consumption has been running and was started with the so-called financial crisis as a result. The expansion must therefore be ensured by production life to get a solution that is not tempting inflation-prone.

The production process in all its ramifications consists of a myriad of complex stages in earnings. The total combined cost of all these stages/levels of labor exceeds the cost of consumption in the traditional sense significantly. As an illustration, one could imagine the value of the total fixed capital stock gradually put into final consumption; it will only take place over several years. US consumer spending was estimated at only about 8.5 per cent producers’ cost of production factors and other producer goods already a lifetime ago. That is, almost 12 times greater than private consumption (here almost 12 if 8.5 per cent carefully assumed). What is spent on consumption – private and public – come from the production, while production comes from capital (including the cost of factors of production, in which wages would include central), as in the first part comes from savings. Therefore, it is the case that more savings the more ca-pial is formed and accumulates in order to produce, and there can then be consumed more. One could abide by the following fact: government spen-ding and private consumption do not stimulate, but drain the economy. This is true whether you find these expenses and/or consumption righteous.

EDP created international competition from the 1970s – a comparable if not similar competition upheaval in the 1800s was better prepared.

The agricultural crisis in the 1800s was in one way bigger and more important for Europe because absolute dominance of agricultural activity in the occupational structure at the time when the cheap grain from the United States, because the hard steel-manufacturing process via the bessemer method and the puddling sub-process became possible, resulting in super sturdy rails and thus just because of that far low freight rates from the US Midwest in 50-tonne trucks for disembarkkation ports. 1800s European agricultural crisis was also larger than we today might imagine, but at the same time the initiatives for the necessary restructuring chan-ges (including for livestock production) in Denmark were taken by the farsighted/lucky leaders who began agrarian reforms in the 1700s. This time the responsible has not been willing to listen to farsighted and insightful, but guided blindly by an ideology devoid of rational sense.

Inventions promote living conditions – ideologies hinder them.

J. E. Vig, M. Sc. (Economics)

11 December 2014 and 6 April 2015

PARIS: THE CEREMONIES FOR PEACE CONTINUES AND THE REACTIONS

1 million on the streets of Paris with 50 Heads of State and Government in front. It is a new kind of modern solidarity, it is called. But solidarity with whom? First, the subjects in the streets a few days in a row. Next, the elite, the top and new crowds in the streets.

It was the effect of the heinous crime. There is jubilation in Islamist circles. One thing is the extended time span which the actions take place over this time with a distribution of attacks on several points, then police several days hunting, and especially law enforcement demo, then follows the popular self-adoration flæberiet and false feeling Ministry for exhibition in the streets, and finally which crowns the work met 50 heads of government up. They traveled to Paris and posed, mostly in dark clothing, but with clearly changing approach to it passed, to photography and TV footage. The celebration, solidarity, universal human rights, sadness, common feelings, at least the political privacy, intimacy, they were all together, together. If leaders lived up to attitude training among the subjects even with mutual grip of embrace so we do not know much. In any event, two of them in front was not motivated to embrace, for sure.

July 7, 2005 attack on London’s innocent inhabitants had little in common with cartoonist attack in Paris. There was the 2005 attack with bombs on both a double and three commuter trains:

The first explosion happened in subway stations between Liverpool Street and Aldgate East.
The second explosion occurred on the underground between King’s Cross St. Pancras and Russell Square.
The third explosion occurred in the subway at Edgware Road.
The fourth came in a double-decker bus at the junction between Tavistock Square and Woburn Square.
52 civilians were killed and more than 700 were injured

Wider use of terror had already begun in 2005, so the effect could be seen more and more in the media. Another special effect that not many with Western habit of thinking realized in 2005: Exactly Edgware Road was in capita terms in 2005 incredibly concentrated with Middle Easterners and Africans – I stayed there randomly about an hour just a week before the bombing and also saw the golden giant saber in front of storefronts to the regular café with hookahs. Just to kill in areas with high concentration of like-minded or many of the same religion roused to battle and war engagement among potential recruits. This agrees with the Islamist thinking. To kill their own are less worrisome. universal rights here quite a different content. And the reactions to the terrorist attacks in Paris has only one effect on the terrorists’ behavior, they roused.

Forward this entry to your contacts

Young Couple Attacked With Out Any Reason

“Christmas Eve should be a evening of joy”, but not for Mads and me, Nanna Skovmand writes. She and her husbond was on their way home attacked in Copenhagen by Somalis and badly wounded. Totaly without reason, absolutely mind lefted, perhaps because they were Danes and actually look like Danes.
The Young couple had taken af taxa from til Christmas Party by the parents of Mads. On the way to the frontdoor a 16 years old Somali cryed out several times: “Do you have a problem?”. Mads asked: “What do you want?”. The Black – Somali – jumped from a bike and hit the Dane with a bottle in the head. Almost at the same time two or three more armed with bicycle chains came to support their aggressive fellow. Mads shouted to Nanna that she should run away.

Nanna recounts:
I thought they would kill him. I tried to tear the attacker away from Mads. The small, shabby and cowardly boys threw me on the asphalt and called me a whore. The Somalis beat the defenseless woman with bicycle chains several times in the face and in the head, after which the cowardly gang fled.

—–
The responsibility are definitely that of the Danish governments’ and the Danish politicians’ on the Christian Bouncy.

THE COST OF THE MASS-IMMIGRATION TO EUROPE

Sources:

Switzerland, short facts:

Was die islamische Immigration Europa kostet – Eine Abrechnung mit einem Mythos – Beispiel Schweiz og

Concerning Denmark Daniel Pipes and the Dane Lars Hedegaard have given some information: New York Post. It tells among other things about 4 per cent. ‘Danish Muslims’ consume 40 per cent of de Danish sociale consumption [and this certainly is not true, as muslims are not counted in any Westerb country, we can tell, and we inform the about 11-13 per cent of those living in Denmark in 2013, originate from a islamic dominated country or area.]. We correct this below.

Was die islamische Immigration Europa kostet – Eine Abrechnung mit einem Mythos – Beispiel Dänemark

Switzerland:

„The welfare was made for the Swiss native, but it is used by foreigners. The Swiss social state has an immigrantproblem. Investigations show that 80 per cent of the social services go to foreigners, to asylumn seakers and people that recently have become Citizens of the country. [4] [1]

The share of employed immigrants was 53.4 per cent in 1990, but 17 years later (2007) is was 30.2 per cent. In plain text : 70 per cent of all foreigners, that immigrate to Switzerland turn directly to the welfare. [2]

Social benefits : 43.7 per cent to individuals of foreign origin. With a share of foreigners in the population of 20.5 per cent the risk of becoming a consumer social welfare is higher than that of the Swiss natives. [7]

„But the immigrants have neither language skills or the working skills with them, and they are not prepared for further education, to Men indvandrere har hverken sprogkundskaber eller arbejdsudddannelse med sig, og er at videreuddanne sig passende, let alone ‘to become integrated’. Unskilled labor without language skills are in the specialized labor in Switzerland hardly a chance.” [8]

„Thanks to our generous social systems often lack an incentive to continue with further education or to intensify job search in global labor markets. In Switzerland, we can not move relatives or spouses who (in many countries) to pay for the unemployed, but unemployment insurance and social assistance – and thus the contribution and taxpayers. The result: the proportion of foreigners of welfare recipients in Switzerland is above average and is growing steadily. Relating the foreigners who account for a proportion of the population of 20.4 percent, 43.8 percent of social assistance and more than forty percent of (Hartz) IV-services.“[9]

[1] Roger Köppel: „Zuwanderung in die Sozialsysteme“, Kommentar in: Die Weltwoche, Ausgabe 14/2007.

[2] Adrian Amstutz, Nationalrat: “Ausländische Sozialwerkplünderer gehören ausgeschafft” Die “Balkanisierung” der Sozialwerke, in: Radio Kempten, 9.8.2007.

[4] ebd.

[7] Schweizer Bundesamt für Statistik.

[8] Adrian Amstutz: „Die “Balkanisierung” der Sozialwerke“, Schweizerzeit Nr.22, 7.September 2007 (http://www.schweizerzeit.ch/2207/sozialwerk.htm)

[9] ebd.

Demographische Bombe: Zahl der Muslime Europas explodiert

“Were there all 600,000 Muslims in Europe in 1945, there are already over 50 millions. The Lisbon Treaty, Europe has committed itself to receive additional 50-100,000,000 Muslims in Europe. Within 2050. Mostly from North African countries. But increasingly the regions in the so-called black Africa or Central Africa and Equatorial Africa south of the Sahara. 90 per cent of all since the 90s of last century, who came to Europe as immigrants were Muslims”.

In southern France, there are now more mosques than churches. 30 percent of the French population to 20 years are Muslims. In Nice and Paris, whose share is already 45 percent . 2027 20 percent of the French population will be Muslims. Within 2050, France being an Islamic republic. In the Netherlands, in 2025 half of the Dutch population is Muslim. In England it was growing Muslim population in the last 30 years by 30 times from 82,000 to 2.5 million. Mediator has spoken to over 1000 mosques – many of which were previously churches. In Belgium 25 per cent of the total population was already Muslims in 2010. 50 per cent of all newborns in Belgium already Muslims …”

……………………………………………………………………………………….

Danmark, Tyskland, Sverige:

– Welfare consumption in Denmark: 30-35 per cent of the welfare expenses was used on non-Westernes in 2010. In 2010 that was 226-266 bill. kr. of a total of 752.

– In Germany was consumed in 2011: 28 per cent of alle social expenses on immigrants and their children: 2011 that amounted to 131.4 bill. EUR.

– In Sweden consumption of social welfare in 2012 showed a share of 57 per cent on immigrants and their children with I Sverige forbrugtes i 2012 andelen af samtlige socialbidrag 57% with an over-representation of 7.1 times. I 2007 290 bill. sv.kr. corresponding to 22.3 per cent of total tax revenue of 1300 bill. sv. kr. in 2007.

– In Norway Næringslivets Hovedorganisasion
has given af press release, as a bomb under the information of what the immigrantcost officially should be in Denmark. Danish official reports has estimated expenses to 15.7 bill. kr. per year. The Norwegians has now estimated the Norwegian expenses to about 60 milliarder n.kr. i 2011. But this has to be wrong, because Norway has much more immigrants than Denmark although more employed.

– France consumes ar least as many Euro on the project as Germany does.

and we have just concentrated on the econonmic all destroying.

Bruxelles, Antwerpen og Amsterdam has been taken. Belgien og Holland are taken 2030.

—————————————————————-

The ideologies Liberalism and Internationalism reached concensus:

The liberales would have the tax-based welfare system abolished even though they have aggreed introduce it. Internationales would have a new dictatorship to aime for, after the Sovjet Union collapes. If it should be clergy dictatorship with a new legal religion did not play a role. None of the influential players understood that every ideology is as any other ideology. …or did they?

J. E. Vig, 2. februar 2014

The EU wants to legalise pedophilia

This issue is much more important than it seems at first sight, and similar tendencies in other countries suggest that they all have a common origin : The EU. Unfortunately the mindset behind all this is so unlikely that ordinary peope refuse to believe it. Which gives the instigators a tactical advantage. But let us consider another area first: biology.

Most female animals become enraged if their young are attacked. They try to save them unless the situation is hopeless. The culture conflict ensuing from immigration from under-developed countries that we are now caught up in is not a war with weapons but a war against the individual. He or she continually and increasingly risks being attacked randomly in the street and kicked beaten sometimes even to death. Women are attacked and raped.
Believe it or not, a similar attack is being planned at the apex of society. The target is again the individual but this time the violence is not physical but psychological. The procedure is simple: Ways – often very simple ways – are found to take the child from its parents. The immediate excuse could be – as is often the case in Sweden – that because the parents sometimes prefer to give their children elementary education themselves. And this is forbidden. The children who have been removed from their parents are put in the care of foster parents or sent to an institution, where they are purportedly better off. But in some cases the authorities have been obliged to pay the separated children damages for their lost childhood once they have reached adulthood.

All-powerful authorities can also remove children in more discreet ways. Children can be tricked into accepting splitting their families via forced schooling without understanding what is at stake.

This underhand method started with the Lisbon Treaty in 2008. Its text permitted new legislation legalising pedophilia, the sexual abuse of childfren

The background for this move was the immigration tidal wave of “unintegrateable” muslims from Africa, who all insist on holding on to their “culture”. A part of this culture is permissible pedophilia both inside the family and in the tradition of child brides. For non- muslims this idea is repugnant, but having for some years advocated sex in all its forms the next step after acceptance of homosexuality is logically pedophilia, and a Swedish sex- society, RFSL, (campaigning under the guise of equal rights!) has been accepted by the UN in 2007 as a consultative body for several countries.

The EU has now in conjunction with WHO (World Health Organisation) proposed obligatory sex-education for kindergarten childrem (WHO recommends this from birth!) in all forms of sex including pedophilia. This should come into effect in from the year 2015. Many parents have protested that the right to bring up their children has been taken from them by offical authorities and that the natural order of things has been reversed. WHO contends that sex-education in all its forms is absolutely necessary for the children’s health and well-being. Parents og course are not pleased at the idea of lubricious political sex-education, but they don’t have a leg to stand on
Many parents will disagree with my objections to all this, because they cannot imagine that things will go as badly as I predict.. But they will. I have seen all this before, in the seventies, when school teachers used pornographic teaching material and even pornographic magazines. A parent’s revolt agains the EUs planned sex-education is already underway in southern Germany where there have been demonstrations against it, and in Switzerland parents are working for a referendum on the subject

The Swedish “Scandinavian Committee for Human Rights” targets parents and purports to protect children’s human rights. Its members try to prevent unnecessary amd distressing removal of children from their parents. These often take place on thr basis of dubious contentions and under the cloak of a professional vow of silence”.

Sweden is notorious for this sort of thing as it often turns out that the fosterparents and the institutions to which the children are assigned are not properly checked for bad behaviour including pedophilia. The Swedish state plays down these dreadful incidents by paying compensation to the children for the loss of their childhood.

I It now turns out that on March 19th the “Scandinavian Committe for Human Rights”has took part in a big conference in the European Parliament’s Petitions Committee (PETI) re. forced removal of children and forced adoption of Children in Great Britain.

The number of children involved was apparently about 1000 a month without anybody intervening.

It has also come to light that NKMR sent a report on conditions in Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland on december 23rd to PETI but that they have not yet received an answer.

One picture and text from the conference said everything, because it gave people the maximum shock – also known as the truth. Supreme Court judges were actually involved in a child-sex network: The British queen’s advisor and founder of a pedophile ring opposing the incareration of criminals. Lord Justice Adrian Fulford was last year appointed advisor to the British queen. He was also an important menber of the notorious pedophile group for exchange of information (PIE). The police suspects the group are abusing children “at an industrial level”. Fulton has been revealed as one of the principal campaigners defending PIE, who demand that the age of consent for for sex with children (pedophilia) should be set at six years of age.

This is a sick society. Muslims want to import their “culture” to Europe and are hindered by laws outlawing pedophilia. So the EU gives in as it always does. This trend is so difficult to understand that many will think it’s all a misunderstanding. They want to believe that the family is still protected by recognised parental authority. But this is no longer the case. A powerful dictatorship of the elite can do whayever it wants.

Gertrud Galster

VOICE FOR THE VOICELESS – BILL WARNER – VIDEO 1&2

Obama-visit And New Stronger Agenda In Sweden

SWEDEN GONE MAD?

The media notes that 2 mio. refugies have left Syria and 7 mio. have left their homes. 27 mio. inhabitant in Syria.

THE SWEDISH GOVERNMENT ON BEHARF OF THE SWEDES grants

permanent stay to all Syrians in Sweden and invites the rest of

Syrians to come to Sweden eventually apply for permanent stay

in advance.

Sweden has a population of 9.6 mio.

Source: Migrationverket, Monday 2 September 2013: http://www.migrationsverket.se/info/7595.html

Sweden has about 30 p.c. immigrants and their children (officially 26.6 p.c. ultimo 2011). SKL (an association of municipalities) in Sweden will multiply the immigration to Sweden with ten. It was while the number each year was much smaller than today. Total population in Sweden was 9,596,436 1 January 2013. Last year the immigration to Sweden was 110,000 nett. The new proposal implicates 350,000 a year and 8,050,000 without births and deads included in 2035.

The same day as the new proposal of free immigration to Sweden from Syria we calculated that Sweden had 16 years more
with ethnic Swedish majority. Now the development certainly develops.

Year 2012 57 p.c. of all social security-payments in Sweden went to immigrants and their children. ‘Inrikes fødde’ (born in the country)
instead of immigrants it’s called, but there are two generation of foreign origins born in Sweden. So it’s even worse. Cost involving welfare-workers is not included.

We then conclude: The Swedish government wants Sweden to go bankruptcy before islam takes over.

MUSLIMS MUST REJECT JIHAD

Tommy Robinson, leader of English Defence League (EDL) speaks out about the public beheading in UK

Tommy Robinson, co-founder of the English Defence League, sounds off on the horrific public murder and mutilation of English soldier Drummer Lee Rigby in the Woolwich area of London. As Robinson explains, the savage attack indicates that the dark future awaiting the United Kingdom is closer than most realize.

He used to be a plumber until Muslims spat on his soldier-friends returning from Afghanistan.That made him angry and he decided to risk everything to stop Islam. He is regularly harrased by both the police and Muslims. Take a few minutes to listen to world famous, straight talking Tommy Robinson:

Se videoen med Tommy Robinson: http://frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/tommy-robinson-on-woolwich-islamist-terrorist-attack/ (have 1/2 min. patience)

What the West needs to know (have 1/2 min. patience – and send further out anyway)